Model read
Close to a coin-flip, barely a lean.
Conviction is how far the model's probability sits from an even 50/50: Strong at 18 points or more, Moderate at 8 points or more, Lean below that.
Conviction: Lean
Over 3.5 cards56.9%
Match referee
The referee's own averages across every completed match with this referee in our data. A rate needs at least 5 matches with that figure. Previous referees are never used to guess an appointment.
Assigned per API-Football, seen 28 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC. An assignment can change before kickoff.
| Per match | All matches | 2026/27 |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 89 | 3 |
| Goals | 2.66 | Not available |
| Yellow cards | 3.39 | Not available |
| Red cards | 0.18 | Not available |
| Corners | 10.3 | Not available |
| Fouls | 23.1 | Not available |
| Both teams scored | 62% | Not available |
| Over 2.5 goals | 51% | Not available |
| Home wins | 44% | Not available |
| Date | Match | Score | Goals | BTTS | Yellow | Red | Corners | Fouls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | Newport County vs York | 1-1 | 2 | Yes | 5 | 1 | 6 | 22 |
| 19 Sep 2026 | Salford vs Swindon | 1-0 | 1 | No | 3 | 0 | 17 | 16 |
| 12 Sep 2026 | Barnet vs Accrington | 2-1 | 3 | Yes | 6 | 1 | 10 | 28 |
| 2 May 2026 | Crewe vs Cambridge | 0-0 | 0 | No | 4 | 0 | 14 | 32 |
| 11 Apr 2026 | Newport County vs Harrogate | 2-1 | 3 | Yes | 3 | 0 | 15 | 22 |
| 7 Feb 2026 | Fleetwood Town vs Bromley | 1-2 | 3 | Yes | 4 | 0 | 4 | 22 |
| 31 Jan 2026 | Shrewsbury vs Barnet | 0-0 | 0 | No | 4 | 0 | 9 | 24 |
| 17 Jan 2026 | Oldham vs Cheltenham | 2-1 | 3 | Yes | 5 | 0 | 11 | 27 |
| 26 Dec 2025 | Gillingham vs Cambridge | 1-1 | 2 | Yes | 1 | 0 | 11 | 21 |
| 4 Oct 2025 | Barnet vs Accrington | 2-0 | 2 | No | 4 | 0 | 8 | 19 |
Cards (bookings)
Model probabilities for this match. Over means more than the stated line; Under means fewer. For example, over 2.5 requires at least 3. These estimates are not bookmaker odds.
Yellow-card estimates use recorded match data; bookmaker settlement rules may differ, these are the model total-booking probabilities for Shrewsbury vs Gillingham. The model leans toward Gillingham for the most cards.
Total cards
Both teams combined.
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 cards | 76.4% | 23.6% |
| 3.5 cards | 56.9% | 43.1% |
| 4.5 cards | 37.4% | 62.6% |
| 5.5 cards | 21.7% | 78.3% |
Who picks up more cards
Team cards lines
Shrewsbury
Gillingham
Card handicap
The four handicap lines closest to an even split. The line is Shrewsbury's; Gillingham gets the opposite line. Half lines have no push.
| Shrewsbury line | Shrewsbury | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| -1.5 | 19.9% | 80.1% |
| -0.5 | 37.1% | 62.9% |
| +0.5 | 57.8% | 42.2% |
| +1.5 | 76.2% | 23.8% |
Red card
Fouls
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5 fouls | 72.8% | 27.2% |
| 22.5 fouls | 58.4% | 41.6% |
| 24.5 fouls | 43.2% | 56.8% |
Recent referees
The referees each side has met most this season, with cards per game overall and for that team. This history does not establish who officiates this match. The main match page shows a saved match referee when available.
| Team | Referee | Games | Cards/g | Team cards/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shrewsbury | I Searle | 2 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Swipe to see all referee stats →
Card trends
2026/27 · Recorded results. At this venue means Shrewsbury at home and Gillingham away. A rate appears only after five matches with the figure, three for the home or away split; a missing value is never zero.
Bar scales · Cards per game: 0–5 · Recorded rate (%): 0–100. Each team uses the same scale for each metric.
Cards accuracy
How our Cards calls have actually done, each one scored against the real result on matches the model had never seen.
In 11,337 matches we rated like this one (50–60%), Cards actually happened 55.8% of the time.
Predictions & track record updated 28 Oct 2026.
Our last 10 Cards calls
Our most recent Cards calls, each one scored against the result. The model had never seen these matches when it made them. Green means we got it right, red means we got it wrong, and the number is how sure we were.
Model analysis: reasoning, key facts and model lenses
Expert AI analysis
Our model lands on Over 3.5 cards at 56.9%, its strongest read on the Cards market. Line by line, the read runs from 76.4% for over 2.5 to 21.7% for over 5.5, with over 3.5 the closest line to a coin-flip at 56.9%. Head to head on cards, Gillingham are the model’s pick to pick up more cards at 42.2%, with a level count at 20.6%. This is a model estimate; validation depends on the market and available sample.
In-depth analysis
For the team lines, Shrewsbury over 1.5 cards sits at 57.8% and Gillingham at 61.3%. A red card for either side is rated at 15.4% (Shrewsbury 9.3%, Gillingham 6.7%). Shrewsbury’s most frequent referee this season, I Searle, has averaged 3.0 cards a game across 2 of their matches; the appointment for this game is not known before kickoff.
Every figure here is what the model thinks, not advice. We score every call against the result after the match.
Model lenses
The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.
This season
2026/27 · Recorded results.
Bar scales · Cards per game: 0–5 · Fouls per game: 0–20. Each team uses the same scale for each metric.
FAQ
How many cards in Shrewsbury vs Gillingham?
Will there be a red card in Shrewsbury vs Gillingham?
Which team will pick up more cards in Shrewsbury vs Gillingham?
How is this probability calculated?
Is this a betting tip?
More League Two, Cards
Related
Model estimates; validation depends on the market and available sample. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.


