Shrewsbury vs Gillingham prediction

League Two
ShrewsburyShrewsburyWLWWD
Sat, 31 Oct 202631/1015:00UK
GillinghamGillinghamDWLDL
42.6%Home winFair odds 2.35
27.5%DrawFair odds 3.64
29.8%Away winFair odds 3.36
Most likely published score1-113.1%Fair odds 7.62

MODELS TOP 3

Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.

Under 3.5 goalsBoth teams combined74.4%
Over 1.5 goalsBoth teams combined73.2%
Over 7.5 cornersBoth teams combined73.2%

Early prediction · Model generated .

Our verdict

Road2Sushi's own call on this match: the likeliest result, how confident the model is, its strongest signals and the reasons behind them.

Every percentage is a model estimate and every fair price is 1 divided by that estimate. Neither is a bookmaker offer, and a model call is not a proven edge over the market.

Model pick

Shrewsbury
Match winner (1X2)42.6%
Fair odds2.35
Save model pickSaved to my bets

Top signals

Goals marketUnder 3.5 goals
Model estimateModel74.4%
Fair oddsFair1.34
Corners marketOver 7.5 corners
Model estimateModel73.2%
Fair oddsFair1.37
Double chance marketShrewsbury or draw
Model estimateModel70.1%
Fair oddsFair1.43

Model read

An open result market: Shrewsbury lead at 42.6%, with draw 27.5% and Gillingham at 29.8%. No result has a majority of the model probability. Over 3.5 Read full analysisShow less

An open result market: Shrewsbury lead at 42.6%, with draw 27.5% and Gillingham at 29.8%. No result has a majority of the model probability. Over 3.5 cards · both teams stands out at 56.9%. The estimate leans this way, with substantial uncertainty remaining. Without a complete matching price comparison, this is an event read rather than a verified price opportunity. The overall match assessment has not cleared the model's betting filters; this market read does not override that decision.

Over 3.5 cards · both teams

Model estimate
56.9%
Fair odds
1.76

Under 7.5 shots on target · both teams

Model estimate
55.6%
Fair odds
1.80

Under 24.5 shots · both teams

Model estimate
55.0%
Fair odds
1.82

Context & limits

  • Shrewsbury: 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • Gillingham: 1 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • The last 2 recorded meetings averaged 3.5 goals. This is a historical sample, not a forecast for this fixture.
  • Some displayed estimates have limited validation. Read those percentages as a range, not a precise prediction.
  • A complete matching price comparison is unavailable for this selection, so a price edge cannot be established.
Additional match context

The model leans Shrewsbury at 43% when Shrewsbury host Gillingham in the League Two on 31 October 2026. A lean, though, not a lock. Three angles decide this preview: 1) Worth knowing: bookmakers rate Shrewsbury higher (49%) than our model does. 2) Totals sit close to the fence: 47% for Over 2.5 with both teams to score at 52%. 3) Head to head, the last 2 meetings gave 0 wins for Shrewsbury, 1 draws and 1 for Gillingham, averaging 3.5 goals a game. Recent form reads W3 D2 L1 for Shrewsbury against W1 D2 L3 for Gillingham. Verdict: no bet. Too extreme an outsider (fair 0.23).

Form & head-to-head

Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.

Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.

ShrewsburyShrewsburyLast 5
W
Win · 2-1
L
Loss · 0-1
W
Win · 1-0
W
Win · 3-2
D
Draw · 3-3

3 wins · 1 draw · 1 loss

GillinghamGillinghamLast 5
D
Draw · 0-0
W
Win · 4-1
L
Loss · 1-3
D
Draw · 1-1
L
Loss · 1-4

1 win · 2 draws · 2 losses

W Win
D Draw
L Loss

Head-to-head

Last 2 meetings

0ShrewsburyShrewsbury wins
1Draws
1GillinghamGillingham wins
3.5Average goals
Date
Home team
Score
Away team
GillinghamGillingham
1 – 0
ShrewsburyShrewsbury
ShrewsburyShrewsbury
3 – 3
GillinghamGillingham

Odds: model vs bookmaker

Every price for this match in one place: the model's probabilities next to the bookmaker's, the bookmaker's prices with our gap, and the model's own fair odds for each market.

Bookmaker probabilities are de-vigged (the margin is removed) and come from one bookmaker. A gap between the model and that bookmaker is a disagreement, not a proven edge. Fair odds are 1 divided by the model probability, not a bookmaker quote.

Model vs market

Model estimates and recorded bookmaker probabilities.

1X2, Goals and Corners: Bet365 prices via API-Football, observed 28 Oct 2026, 10:43 UTC, with the bookmaker margin taken out.

A market probability is the bookmaker's own price with its margin taken out, so the outcomes of each line add up to 100%. A gap from our model is a disagreement, not a proven edge: when we tested 1X2 and goal totals on matches the model had never seen, the bookmaker's closing price was more accurate. For corners, cards and shots we have no such test.

1X2

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 42.6%
Shrewsbury

Model minus market: -5.2 pp
Market probability: 47.8%
Model probability: 27.5%
Draw

Model minus market: +0.2 pp
Market probability: 27.3%
Model probability: 29.8%
Gillingham

Model minus market: +4.9 pp
Market probability: 24.9%

Goals

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 91.7%
Over 0.5 goals

Model minus market: -0.5 pp
Market probability: 92.2%
Model probability: 8.3%
Under 0.5 goals

Model minus market: +0.5 pp
Market probability: 7.8%
Model probability: 73.2%
Over 1.5 goals

Model minus market: +1.0 pp
Market probability: 72.2%
Model probability: 26.8%
Under 1.5 goals

Model minus market: -1.0 pp
Market probability: 27.8%
Model probability: 47.3%
Over 2.5 goals

Model minus market: +1.4 pp
Market probability: 45.8%
Model probability: 52.8%
Under 2.5 goals

Model minus market: -1.4 pp
Market probability: 54.2%
Model probability: 25.6%
Over 3.5 goals

Model minus market: +2.3 pp
Market probability: 23.3%
Model probability: 74.4%
Under 3.5 goals

Model minus market: -2.3 pp
Market probability: 76.7%
Model probability: 11.8%
Over 4.5 goals

Model minus market: +1.8 pp
Market probability: 10.0%
Model probability: 88.2%
Under 4.5 goals

Model minus market: -1.8 pp
Market probability: 90.1%
Model probability: 4.7%
Over 5.5 goals

Model minus market: +0.7 pp
Market probability: 3.9%
Model probability: 95.4%
Under 5.5 goals

Model minus market: -0.7 pp
Market probability: 96.1%
Model probability: 52.3%
Both teams to score · Yes

Model minus market: +2.3 pp
Market probability: 50.0%
Model probability: 47.7%
Both teams to score · No

Model minus market: -2.3 pp
Market probability: 50.0%

Cards

No recorded bookmaker price for this market.

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 76.4%
Over 2.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 23.6%
Under 2.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 56.9%
Over 3.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 43.1%
Under 3.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 37.4%
Over 4.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 62.6%
Under 4.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 21.7%
Over 5.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 78.3%
Under 5.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Corners

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 73.2%
Over 7.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 26.8%
Under 7.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 61.8%
Over 8.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 38.2%
Under 8.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 49.9%
Over 9.5 corners

Model minus market: +6.1 pp
Market probability: 43.9%
Model probability: 50.1%
Under 9.5 corners

Model minus market: -6.1 pp
Market probability: 56.1%
Model probability: 38.5%
Over 10.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 61.5%
Under 10.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 28.3%
Over 11.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 71.7%
Under 11.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 20.0%
Over 12.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 80.1%
Under 12.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Shots

No recorded bookmaker price for this market.

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 57.9%
Over 22.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 42.2%
Under 22.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 45.0%
Over 24.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 55.0%
Under 24.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 33.0%
Over 26.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 67.0%
Under 26.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 22.8%
Over 28.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 77.2%
Under 28.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 57.7%
Over 6.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 42.3%
Under 6.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 44.4%
Over 7.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 55.6%
Under 7.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 32.3%
Over 8.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 67.7%
Under 8.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 22.3%
Over 9.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 77.7%
Under 9.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Bookmaker odds

Real bookmaker price (APIF:Pinnacle:4) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.

Gap is our probability minus the probability the bookmaker price implies (1 divided by the price), in percentage points. Because the price includes the margin, most gaps are negative. Model highlights are outcomes where our probability is at least 15 points higher. A gap is a disagreement, not a proven edge.

Match result · 1X2

Shrewsbury winBookmaker1.93Model fair2.35Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -9.2 pp
DrawBookmaker3.36Model fair3.64Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -2.2 pp
Gillingham winBookmaker4.01Model fair3.36Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: +4.8 pp

Goals · 2.5

Over 2.5 goalsBookmaker2.04Model fair2.12Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -1.7 pp
Under 2.5 goalsBookmaker1.76Model fair1.90Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -4.0 pp

Model fair odds

Our published model probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote. Only the supported 1X2 calibration pool is calibrated; other markets retain their model estimates.

Match result

Shrewsbury win2.35
Draw3.64
Gillingham win3.36
Both teams to score1.91

Goals

Over 0.5 goals1.09
Over 1.5 goals1.37
Over 2.5 goals2.12
Over 3.5 goals3.90
Shrewsbury most2.34
Gillingham most3.36

Corners

Over 7.5 corners1.37
Over 8.5 corners1.62
Over 9.5 corners2.00
Over 10.5 corners2.60
Shrewsbury most1.78
Gillingham most3.01

Cards

Over 2.5 cards1.31
Over 3.5 cards1.76
Over 4.5 cards2.68
Over 5.5 cards4.61
Shrewsbury most2.69
Gillingham most2.37

Shots on target

Over 6.5 SoT1.73
Over 7.5 SoT2.25
Over 8.5 SoT3.10
Over 9.5 SoT4.49
Shrewsbury most1.74
Gillingham most3.39

Shots

Over 22.5 shots1.73
Over 24.5 shots2.22
Over 26.5 shots3.03
Over 28.5 shots4.39
Shrewsbury most1.62
Gillingham most3.12

Fouls

Over 20.5 fouls1.37
Over 22.5 fouls1.71
Over 24.5 fouls2.31

Corners

Both teams combined.

Over 7.5 corners73.2%1.37Likely
Over 8.5 corners61.8%1.62Likely
Over 9.5 corners49.9%2.00Close call
Over 10.5 corners38.5%2.60Unlikely
Over 11.5 corners28.3%3.53Long shot
Over 12.5 corners20.0%5.01Long shot
Read context

Both teams combined

Over 7.5 corners · Likely

Over 8.5 corners · Likely

Over 9.5 corners · Close call

Over 10.5 corners · Unlikely

Over 11.5 corners · Long shot

Over 12.5 corners · Long shot

Most corners

Each team has its own model probability; these outcomes are not renormalised.

Shrewsbury

Model probability

56.3%Fair odds 1.78

Gillingham

Model probability

33.2%Fair odds 3.01

Read context

Each team has its own model probability; these outcomes are not renormalised.

Shrewsbury

Gillingham

Shots

Both teams combined.

Over 22.5 shots57.9%1.73Close call
Over 24.5 shots45.0%2.22Close call
Over 26.5 shots33.0%3.03Unlikely
Over 28.5 shots22.8%4.39Long shot
Over 6.5 on target57.7%1.73Close call
Over 7.5 on target44.4%2.25Unlikely
Over 8.5 on target32.3%3.10Unlikely
Over 9.5 on target22.3%4.49Long shot
Read context

Both teams combined

Over 22.5 shots · Close call

Over 24.5 shots · Close call

Over 26.5 shots · Unlikely

Over 28.5 shots · Long shot

Over 6.5 on target · Close call

Over 7.5 on target · Unlikely

Over 8.5 on target · Unlikely

Over 9.5 on target · Long shot

What the model expects

The average number of shots and shots on target each team takes in the model's own distribution for this match, the same distribution the lines above come from. It is an average, not a betting line, and it is a model estimate, not a recorded result.

Model expected shots and shots on target, Shrewsbury vs Gillingham
Model expects Shots On target
Shrewsbury 13.2 4.2
Gillingham 10.8 3.1
Both teams 24.0 7.3

Recorded shots per game

Shots per game over each side's most recent league matches with shot data, and over the most recent matches at the venue of this match: Shrewsbury at home and Gillingham away. These are recorded results, not predictions, and a missing value is never shown as zero.

Recorded shots per game over recent league matches
Last 6 matches Shots Faced On target
Shrewsbury 14.2 11.2 5.0
Gillingham 7.3 16.2 1.7
Shrewsbury at home 11.8 9.8 3.2
Gillingham away 8.7 16.3 2.3

Totals line guide

Both teams combined.

Over 0.591.7%Over 1.573.2%Over 2.547.3%Over 3.525.6%Over 4.511.8%Over 5.54.7%
Recommended focusOver 1.573.2%

Discipline: Fairly priced. Too extreme an outsider (fair 0.23).

Read context

Both teams combined. Each bar uses the stored model estimate for that exact total-goals line. Missing estimates are unavailable; they are not zero.

Fair odds are the model’s own probability price, not a published bookmaker offer.

Market explorer

Model probabilities and fair odds.

Each bar is a specific Over selection for both teams combined. Its height is the model probability, on the same 0–100% scale.

Risk describes estimated likelihood, not profitability: low risk at least 62%, medium 48% to under 62%, high below 48%. Colors follow the actual estimate, even when a risk band is missing.

Up to four markets are selected from available model data, prioritising a spread of risk profiles. Fair odds are calculated from the model, not bookmaker prices: 1 divided by probability.

Scores are exact home-away outcomes from zero to five goals per team. Unavailable estimates stay blank; partial inputs are not expanded, inferred or normalised. Scores outside the matrix remain eligible for the top three.

Low riskMedium riskHigh risk

Cards

Over 2.52.5 cards, Low risk
Model probability 76.4%
Fair odds Fair 1.31
Over 3.53.5 cards, Medium risk
Model probability 56.9%
Fair odds Fair 1.76
Over 4.54.5 cards, High risk
Model probability 37.4%
Fair odds Fair 2.68

Corners

Over 7.57.5 corners, Low risk
Model probability 73.2%
Fair odds Fair 1.37
Over 9.59.5 corners, Medium risk
Model probability 49.9%
Fair odds Fair 2.00
Over 10.510.5 corners, High risk
Model probability 38.5%
Fair odds Fair 2.60

Fouls

Over 20.520.5 fouls, Low risk
Model probability 72.8%
Fair odds Fair 1.37
Over 22.522.5 fouls, Medium risk
Model probability 58.4%
Fair odds Fair 1.71
Over 24.524.5 fouls, High risk
Model probability 43.2%
Fair odds Fair 2.31

Goals

Over 0.50.5 goals, Low risk
Model probability 91.7%
Fair odds Fair 1.09
Over 1.51.5 goals, Low risk
Model probability 73.2%
Fair odds Fair 1.37
Over 3.53.5 goals, High risk
Model probability 25.6%
Fair odds Fair 3.90
Correct score probabilitiesModel probability / Fair odds
Goal axes Home goals
Away goals 0 1 2 3 4 5
Away goals 0 0-08.3%Fair odds 12.00 1-010.3%Fair odds 9.71 2-07.8%Fair odds 12.90 3-03.7%Fair odds 27.25 4-01.3%Fair odds 76.92 5-00.4%Fair odds 270.27
Away goals 1 0-18.2%Fair odds 12.21 1-113.1%Fair odds 7.62 2-18.9%Fair odds 11.27 3-14.2%Fair odds 23.87 4-11.5%Fair odds 67.11 5-10.4%Fair odds 238.10
Away goals 2 0-25.1%Fair odds 19.80 1-27.2%Fair odds 13.97 2-25.1%Fair odds 19.69 3-22.4%Fair odds 41.67 4-20.9%Fair odds 117.65 5-20.2%Fair odds 416.67
Away goals 3 0-31.9%Fair odds 51.81 1-32.7%Fair odds 36.50 2-31.9%Fair odds 51.55 3-30.9%Fair odds 108.70 4-30.3%Fair odds 303.03 5-30.1%Fair odds 1,111.11
Away goals 4 0-40.5%Fair odds 181.82 1-40.8%Fair odds 126.58 2-40.6%Fair odds 178.57 3-40.3%Fair odds 384.62 4-40.1%Fair odds 1,111.11 5-40.0%Fair odds 3,333.33
Away goals 5 0-50.1%Fair odds 769.23 1-50.2%Fair odds 555.56 2-50.1%Fair odds 769.23 3-50.1%Fair odds 1,666.67 4-50.0%Fair odds 5,000.00 5-50.0%Fair odds 10,000.00

Model’s 3 most likely score outcomes

Model probability · Fair odds

1-1
Model probability13.1%
Fair odds7.62
1-0
Model probability10.3%
Fair odds9.71
2-1
Model probability8.9%
Fair odds11.27

Referee

One match referee is shown from an explicitly saved result or a fresh, identity-matched provider fixture. Previous referees are never used to guess an appointment. An API listing can change.

The referee’s totals count every completed match with this referee in our data: football-data.co.uk names the referee in English leagues, and API-Football names the referee of the same match (same teams, date and score) in every league from 2025/26. A rate needs at least 5 matches with that figure.

The team table shows each team’s published history with that same referee only. Matches, team cards per game and match cards per game are separate fields; their available samples can differ. Missing values are not zero. Cards include yellow and red cards in the current historical source.

Assigned per API-Football, seen 28 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC. An assignment can change before kickoff.

Neil Hair in our data
Per match All matches 2026/27
Matches 89 3
Goals 2.66 Not available
Yellow cards 3.39 Not available
Red cards 0.18 Not available
Corners 10.3 Not available
Fouls 23.1 Not available
Both teams scored 62% Not available
Over 2.5 goals 51% Not available
Home wins 44% Not available
Latest 10 matches
Date Match Score Goals BTTS Yellow Red Corners Fouls
17 Oct 2026 Newport County vs York 1-1 2 Yes 5 1 6 22
19 Sep 2026 Salford vs Swindon 1-0 1 No 3 0 17 16
12 Sep 2026 Barnet vs Accrington 2-1 3 Yes 6 1 10 28
2 May 2026 Crewe vs Cambridge 0-0 0 No 4 0 14 32
11 Apr 2026 Newport County vs Harrogate 2-1 3 Yes 3 0 15 22
7 Feb 2026 Fleetwood Town vs Bromley 1-2 3 Yes 4 0 4 22
31 Jan 2026 Shrewsbury vs Barnet 0-0 0 No 4 0 9 24
17 Jan 2026 Oldham vs Cheltenham 2-1 3 Yes 5 0 11 27
26 Dec 2025 Gillingham vs Cambridge 1-1 2 Yes 1 0 11 21
4 Oct 2025 Barnet vs Accrington 2-0 2 No 4 0 8 19

Neil Hair referee stats

Team history with this referee
Team
Shrewsbury Not available Not available Not available
Gillingham Not available Not available Not available

No matching history for this referee is available for one or both teams.

Season stats

2026/27 season. Recorded results, not model estimates.

ShrewsburyShrewsbury
GillinghamGillingham

Overview

Statistic
Shrewsbury
Gillingham
League position
#10 of 24
#12 of 24
Matches played
13
13
Record W-D-L
5-3-5
4-5-4
Recent form
WLWWD
Last 5 matches
DWLDL
Last 5 matches
Current streak
D1
L1
Points per game
1.38
1.31
Record, home vs away
3-1-2
2-2-2
PPG, home vs away
1.67
1.33

PPG scale: 0–3 points per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Show all season statsHide season stats

Goals

Statistic
Shrewsbury
Gillingham
Goals scored per game
1.23
1.38
Goals conceded per game
1.54
1.38
Scored, home vs away
1.17
1.67
Conceded, home vs away
1.00
1.50
1st half goals per game
0.54
0.46
2nd half goals per game
0.69
0.92

Scale: 0–3 goals or expected goals (xG) per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Shooting

Statistic
Shrewsbury
Gillingham
Shots per game
14.6
9.7
Shots faced per game
9.9
14.6
Shots on target per game
4.3
2.7
1st half shots per game
6.7
3.9
2nd half shots per game
7.4
5.7

Scale: 0–20 shots per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Corners & discipline

Statistic
Shrewsbury
Gillingham
Corners won per game
5.5
3.7
Cards per game
2.8
—
Fouls per game
14.7
13.4
Red cards this season
3
1

0–10 corners per game; 0–5 cards per game; 0–20 fouls per game Each team uses the same scale independently.

Goal rates

Statistic
Shrewsbury
Gillingham
Over 2.5 rate
46.2%
53.8%
BTTS rate
46.2%
53.8%
Clean sheets
23.1%
30.8%

Scale: 0–100% of recorded matches, not model estimates. Each team uses the same scale independently.

League averages this season: 2.62 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 45.0% · BTTS in 55.6%. Full league tables & stats →

First half / second half

Averages per game in this season’s league matches, split at half-time. Games is the number of each team’s matches with verified half data for that row; below five matches the row stays blank, and a missing value is never a zero.

Corners, shots on target and yellow cards per half come from the data provider’s half-by-half match statistics and are only used when the two halves add up to the full-time count. Cards are split by the minute they were shown, and first-half stoppage time counts as the first half. These are recorded results, not predictions.

In the Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, Serie A and Ligue 1 the shots per half come from a different source than the match shot totals, so the two can differ slightly.

ShrewsburyShrewsbury
Shrewsbury: season average per game by half
Per game 1H 2H Games
Goals scoredScored 0.54 0.69 13
Goals concededConceded 0.77 0.77 13
Shots 6.7 7.4 10
Shots facedOpp. shots 4.8 5.1 10
Shots on targetOn target 1.6 2.5 11
Shots on target facedOpp. on target 2.0 1.4 11
Corners wonCorners 2.7 2.6 12
Corners concededOpp. corners 2.4 1.9 12
Yellow cardsYellows 1.0 2.1 11
Opponent yellow cardsOpp. yellows 0.3 1.1 11
GillinghamGillingham
Gillingham: season average per game by half
Per game 1H 2H Games
Goals scoredScored 0.46 0.92 13
Goals concededConceded 0.54 0.85 13
Shots 3.9 5.7 11
Shots facedOpp. shots 6.1 7.9 11
Shots on targetOn target 1.2 1.6 10
Shots on target facedOpp. on target 1.6 2.8 10
Corners wonCorners 1.6 2.1 12
Corners concededOpp. corners 2.6 2.9 12
Yellow cardsYellows 1.1 1.5 11
Opponent yellow cardsOpp. yellows 0.8 1.4 11
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots

Over 22.5 57.9% Over 24.5 45.0% Over 26.5 33.0% Over 28.5 22.8%
Most: Shrewsbury 61.9% Most: Gillingham 32.1%
Shrewsbury Over 10.5 70.2%
Shrewsbury Over 12.5 53.3%
Shrewsbury Over 14.5 36.8% Gillingham Over 10.5 49.9%
Gillingham Over 12.5 31.8%
Gillingham Over 14.5 18.2%

Shots on target

Over 6.5 57.7% Over 7.5 44.4% Over 8.5 32.3% Over 9.5 22.3%
Most: Shrewsbury 57.5% Most: Gillingham 29.5%
Shrewsbury Over 3.5 58.0%
Shrewsbury Over 4.5 40.7%
Shrewsbury Over 5.5 26.3% Gillingham Over 3.5 37.5%
Gillingham Over 4.5 21.7%
Gillingham Over 5.5 11.4%

Cards

Over 2.5 76.4% Over 3.5 56.9% Over 4.5 37.4% Over 5.5 21.7%
Most: Shrewsbury 37.1% Most: Gillingham 42.2%
Shrewsbury Over 1.5 57.8%
Shrewsbury Over 2.5 30.7% Gillingham Over 1.5 61.3%
Gillingham Over 2.5 34.3%

Clean sheet & win to nil

Worked out from the scoreline grid above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the other side fails to score. It is the model’s own percentage, scored against the result afterwards, and it is not a tip.

Shrewsbury clean sheet 31.7%
Gillingham clean sheet 24.2%
Shrewsbury win to nil 23.4%
Gillingham win to nil 15.9%

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

The model’s own percentages, with no odds attached. The smaller markets are here so you can see everything we hold a number on, not because we claim an advantage in them. The colour says how close our percentages have landed to reality on matches the model had never seen. This is the raw model spectrum. Its match-result marginal can differ from the published 1X2 above; it does not replace the saved prediction.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 42.7% draw 27.6% away 29.8%
double_chance
1X 70.2% 12 72.5% X2 57.4%
dnb
home 58.9% away 41.1%
btts
yes 52.3% no 47.7%
clean_sheet
home 31.8% away 24.2%
win_to_nil
home 23.5% away 15.9%
winning_margin
home_by_1 21.9% home_by_2 12.9% home_by_3plus 7.8%
away_by_1 17.6% away_by_2 8.4% away_by_3plus 3.8%
correct_score
0-0 8.3% 0-1 8.2% 0-2 5.1%
0-3 1.9% 0-4 0.5% 0-5 0.1%
1-0 10.3% 1-1 13.1% 1-2 7.2%
1-3 2.7% 1-4 0.8% 1-5 0.2%
2-0 7.8% 2-1 8.9% 2-2 5.1%
2-3 1.9% 2-4 0.6% 2-5 0.1%
3-0 3.7% 3-1 4.2% 3-2 2.4%
3-3 0.9% 3-4 0.3% 3-5 0.1%
4-0 1.3% 4-1 1.5% 4-2 0.9%
4-3 0.3% 4-4 0.1% 4-5 0.0%
5-0 0.4% 5-1 0.4% 5-2 0.2%
5-3 0.1% 5-4 0.0% 5-5 0.0%
other 0.5%
likeliest_score
h 100.0% a 100.0% p 13.1%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 91.7% under_0.5 8.3% over_1.5 73.2%
under_1.5 26.8% over_2.5 47.3% under_2.5 52.8%
over_3.5 25.6% under_3.5 74.4% over_4.5 11.8%
under_4.5 88.2% over_5.5 4.7% under_5.5 95.4%
odd_even
odd 48.4% even 51.6%
team_home
over_0.5 75.8% under_0.5 24.2% over_1.5 41.5%
under_1.5 58.5% over_2.5 17.1% under_2.5 82.9%
team_away
over_0.5 68.2% under_0.5 31.8% over_1.5 31.8%
under_1.5 68.3% over_2.5 10.9% under_2.5 89.1%
most
home 42.7% draw 27.6% away 29.8%
handicap
home_-2.5 7.8% away_+2.5 92.2% home_-1.5 20.7%
away_+1.5 79.3% home_-0.5 42.7% away_+0.5 57.4%
home_+0.5 70.2% away_-0.5 29.8% home_+1.5 87.8%
away_-1.5 12.2% home_+2.5 96.2% away_-2.5 3.8%
total_exact
exact_0 8.3% exact_1 18.5% exact_2 25.9%
exact_3 21.6% exact_4 13.9% exact_5 7.1%
exact_6 3.0% exact_7plus 1.6%
First half range, not a point
1×2
home 32.5% draw 45.8% away 21.7%
total
over_0.5 63.9% under_0.5 36.1% over_1.5 27.1%
under_1.5 72.9% over_2.5 8.4% under_2.5 91.6%
btts
yes 15.5% no 84.5%
total_exact
exact_0 36.1% exact_1 36.8% exact_2 18.7%
exact_3 6.4% exact_4plus 2.0%
Second half range, not a point
1×2
home 33.8% draw 35.7% away 30.6%
total
over_0.5 79.2% under_0.5 20.8% over_1.5 46.6%
under_1.5 53.4% over_2.5 21.0% under_2.5 79.1%
btts
yes 29.6% no 70.4%
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
H/H 24.4% H/D 5.6% H/A 2.4%
D/H 15.5% D/D 16.4% D/A 14.0%
A/H 2.0% A/D 4.3% A/A 15.4%
Corners range, not a point
total
over_7.5 73.2% under_7.5 26.8% over_8.5 61.8%
under_8.5 38.2% over_9.5 49.9% under_9.5 50.1%
over_10.5 38.5% under_10.5 61.5% over_11.5 28.3%
under_11.5 71.7% over_12.5 20.0% under_12.5 80.1%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 74.7% under_3.5 25.3% over_4.5 59.8%
under_4.5 40.2% over_5.5 44.7% under_5.5 55.3%
team_away
over_3.5 59.6% under_3.5 40.4% over_4.5 42.4%
under_4.5 57.6% over_5.5 27.8% under_5.5 72.2%
most
home 56.3% draw 10.5% away 33.2%
handicap
home_-3.5 25.4% away_+3.5 74.6% home_-1.5 45.3%
away_+1.5 54.7% home_-0.5 56.3% away_+0.5 43.7%
home_+0.5 66.8% away_-0.5 33.2% home_+1.5 76.2%
away_-1.5 23.8% home_+3.5 89.6% away_-3.5 10.4%
Shots range, not a point
total
over_22.5 57.9% under_22.5 42.2% over_24.5 45.0%
under_24.5 55.0% over_26.5 33.0% under_26.5 67.0%
over_28.5 22.8% under_28.5 77.2%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_10.5 70.2% under_10.5 29.8% over_12.5 53.3%
under_12.5 46.8% over_14.5 36.8% under_14.5 63.2%
team_away
over_10.5 49.9% under_10.5 50.1% over_12.5 31.8%
under_12.5 68.2% over_14.5 18.2% under_14.5 81.8%
most
home 61.9% draw 6.1% away 32.1%
handicap
home_-4.5 36.2% away_+4.5 63.8% home_-2.5 49.0%
away_+2.5 51.0% home_-0.5 61.9% away_+0.5 38.1%
home_+0.5 68.0% away_-0.5 32.1% home_+2.5 78.7%
away_-2.5 21.3% home_+4.5 86.9% away_-4.5 13.1%
Shots on target range, not a point
total
over_6.5 57.7% under_6.5 42.3% over_7.5 44.4%
under_7.5 55.6% over_8.5 32.3% under_8.5 67.7%
over_9.5 22.3% under_9.5 77.7%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 58.0% under_3.5 42.1% over_4.5 40.7%
under_4.5 59.3% over_5.5 26.3% under_5.5 73.7%
team_away
over_3.5 37.5% under_3.5 62.5% over_4.5 21.7%
under_4.5 78.3% over_5.5 11.4% under_5.5 88.6%
most
home 57.5% draw 13.0% away 29.5%
handicap
home_-2.5 30.9% away_+2.5 69.1% home_-0.5 57.5%
away_+0.5 42.5% home_+0.5 70.5% away_-0.5 29.5%
home_+2.5 89.1% away_-2.5 10.9%
Cards calibrated
total
over_2.5 76.4% under_2.5 23.6% over_3.5 56.9%
under_3.5 43.1% over_4.5 37.4% under_4.5 62.6%
over_5.5 21.7% under_5.5 78.3%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_1.5 57.8% under_1.5 42.2% over_2.5 30.7%
under_2.5 69.3%
team_away
over_1.5 61.3% under_1.5 38.7% over_2.5 34.3%
under_2.5 65.7%
most
home 37.1% draw 20.6% away 42.2%
handicap
home_-1.5 19.9% away_+1.5 80.1% home_-0.5 37.1%
away_+0.5 62.9% home_+0.5 57.8% away_-0.5 42.2%
home_+1.5 76.2% away_-1.5 23.8%
Fouls calibrated
total
over_20.5 72.8% under_20.5 27.2% over_22.5 58.4%
under_22.5 41.6% over_24.5 43.2% under_24.5 56.8%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_9.5 65.9% under_9.5 34.1% over_11.5 43.6%
under_11.5 56.4% over_13.5 24.3% under_13.5 75.6%
team_away
over_9.5 79.1% under_9.5 20.9% over_11.5 60.0%
under_11.5 40.0% over_13.5 39.4% under_13.5 60.6%
most
home 34.9% draw 7.4% away 57.8%
handicap
home_-3.5 16.7% away_+3.5 83.4% home_-0.5 34.9%
away_+0.5 65.1% home_+2.5 57.5% away_-2.5 42.5%
Red card range, not a point
any
yes 15.4% no 84.6%
home
yes 9.3% no 90.7%
away
yes 6.7% no 93.3%
Method, limits & performance

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0106 (56038 matches).

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match