ShrewsburyShrewsburyWLWWD
GillinghamGillinghamDWLDLShrewsbury vs Gillingham correct score prediction
Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.
Model read
No single outcome dominates, read the distribution.
Conviction: Open
Most likely · 13.1%1-1
Correct score
Score distribution: the model probability of each exact score.
Rows = Shrewsbury goals, columns = Gillingham goals. The most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 13.1%.
The grid is the model's full scoreline distribution, not a single tip, but the shape of every plausible result. Read the heatmap as a map of likelihood, not a prediction of one score.
Most likely scorelines
- 1-113.1%
- 1-010.3%
- 2-18.9%
- 0-08.3%
- 0-18.2%
- 2-07.8%
- 1-27.2%
- 2-25.1%
Score probability grid
| H / A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8.3% | 8.2% | 5.1% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| 1 | 10.3% | 13.1% | 7.2% | 2.7% | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| 2 | 7.8% | 8.9% | 5.1% | 1.9% | 0.6% | 0.1% |
| 3 | 3.7% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| 4 | 1.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 5 | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Rows: Shrewsbury · Columns: Gillingham
Goals distribution
How likely each total number of goals is, according to the model. Every goals market on this page is built from these bars. The 5+ bar covers every result with five goals or more.
0
1
2
3
4
5+
Form & head-to-head
Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.
Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.
W
L
W
W
D
3 wins · 1 draw · 1 loss
D
W
L
D
L
1 win · 2 draws · 2 losses
Head-to-head
Last 2 meetings
Overall model accuracy
We don't yet publish a graded Correct Score-specific track record, so this is our overall accuracy across every 1X2 call, graded out-of-sample, updated daily.
Predictions & track record updated 28 Oct 2026.
Model analysis: reasoning, key facts and model lenses
Expert AI analysis
The model makes Most likely · 13.1% at 1-1, its strongest read on the Correct Score market. The goals picture is built on form: Shrewsbury have averaged 1.8 scored and 1.4 conceded, Gillingham 1.4 and 1.8 over their recent games. That fits a balanced goals environment: 47.3% for over 2.5 and 73.2% for at least two goals. Their last 2 meetings have averaged 3.5 goals a game. Read the recorded data and validation context alongside the estimate.
In-depth analysis
For the goal environment, the model sees 47.3% for three or more goals and 73.2% for at least two, painting a balanced picture. Given Shrewsbury favoured at 42.6%, a close contest often produces chances at both ends.
These are the model’s own percentages, not tips. The track record is public, misses included.
Model lenses
The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.
FAQ
What is the most likely score in Shrewsbury vs Gillingham?
How is this probability calculated?
Is this a betting tip?
More League Two, Correct Score
Related
Model estimates; validation depends on the market and available sample. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.
