Groningen vs PEC Zwolle Double Chance
Part of a bigger picture: see the full match page, where this comes from.
Result
The highest-probability cover, Groningen or Draw (78.4%), landed.
model probability
Expert AI analysis
Our model lands on Home or Draw at 78.4%, its strongest read on the Double Chance market. For context, Groningen are favoured at 56.2%, a competitive game that shapes how this market plays out. These are the model’s own calibrated numbers, not betting advice.
Double Chance
Draw no bet
Draw no bet: the draw is taken out and the remaining probability is split between the two sides.
Winning margin
| Margin | Probability |
|---|---|
| Groningen by 1 | 22.2% |
| Groningen by 2 | 17.2% |
| Groningen by 3+ | 16.8% |
| PEC Zwolle by 1 | 12.9% |
| PEC Zwolle by 2 | 6.0% |
| PEC Zwolle by 3+ | 2.7% |
| Draw | 22.2% |
Goal handicap
| Groningen line | Groningen | PEC Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| -2.5 | 16.8% | 83.2% |
| -1.5 | 34.0% | 66.0% |
| -0.5 | 56.2% | 43.8% |
| +0.5 | 78.4% | 21.6% |
This season (2026/27)
Double chance trades a slice of return for a wider safety net. The highest-probability cover is Groningen or draw on the model numbers.
In-depth analysis
Reading the match, Groningen are favoured at 56.2%. How the game flows often matters more here than the pre-match favourite.
We publish the model, not a sure thing. We grade every call after the match.
Model lenses
Different analytical lenses our model applies to the same calibrated data, not separate tipsters, and never a tip.
Form & head-to-head
FAQ
Which double chance landed in Groningen vs PEC Zwolle?
Home or Draw was the highest-probability cover at 78.4%; it landed, final score 3-0.
How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.
Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.
Double Chance accuracy
How our Double Chance calls have actually performed, graded out-of-sample against real results.
In 40,105 matches we rated like this one (70–80%), Double Chance actually happened 73.4% of the time.
Predictions & track record updated 19 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →
Our last 10 Double Chance calls
The model’s most recent graded Double Chance predictions, out-of-sample. Green means the call hit, red means it missed. The number is the model confidence on each.
More Eredivisie, Double Chance
Related
Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.

