Chelsea vs Bournemouth prediction & probabilities (2026-10-10)

Premier League

Chelsea vs Bournemouth Cards

2026-10-10 · 15:00
Cards63.6%Over 3.5 cards
Best predictionOver 3.5 cards · 63.6%A moderate lean, nothing emphatic. Calibrated, not a tip.
64%

model probability

ConvictionModerate

Expert AI analysis

The model makes Over 3.5 cards at 63.6%, its strongest read on the Cards market. Across the lines, the model goes from 81.2% for over 2.5 to 27.6% for over 5.5, with over 4.5 the closest line to a coin-flip at 44.4%. Head to head on cards, Bournemouth are the model’s pick to pick up more cards at 53.2%, with a level count at 18.8%. It is a calibrated model probability, graded out-of-sample, not a tip.

Cards (bookings)

Over 2.581.2%

Over 3.563.6%

Over 4.544.4%

Over 5.527.6%

Total cards, every line

Line Over Under
2.5 cards 81.2% 18.8%
3.5 cards 63.6% 36.4%
4.5 cards 44.4% 55.6%
5.5 cards 27.6% 72.4%

Who picks up more cards

Chelsea28.0%

Level18.8%

★ ModelBournemouth53.2%

Team card lines

Chelsea over 1.5

54.9%

Chelsea over 2.5

28.1%

Bournemouth over 1.5

71.9%

Bournemouth over 2.5

46.4%

Card handicap

Chelsea line Chelsea Bournemouth
-1.5 14.0% 86.0%
-0.5 28.0% 72.0%
+0.5 46.8% 53.2%
+1.5 66.1% 33.9%

Red card

Any red card17.8%

Chelsea red card13.0%

Bournemouth red card5.5%

Fouls

Line Over Under
20.5 fouls 69.4% 30.6%
22.5 fouls 54.0% 46.0%
24.5 fouls 38.5% 61.5%

Recent referees

The referees each side has met most this season, with cards per game overall and for that team. We never claim who officiates this match: the appointment is not known before kickoff.

Team Referee Games Cards/g Team cards/g
Bournemouth J Gillett 2 4.5 3.5

This season (2026/27)

1.8Chelsea cards per game
8.6Chelsea fouls per game
2.8Bournemouth cards per game
12.0Bournemouth fouls per game

Card markets are softer and less efficiently priced than goals, these are the model total-booking probabilities for Chelsea vs Bournemouth. It tips Bournemouth for the most cards.

In-depth analysis

We publish the model, not a sure thing. What we are good at is getting the percentage right, not at beating the bookmakers.

63.6%Over 3.5 cards
17.8%Any red card
53.2%Most cards: Bournemouth
54.9%Chelsea over 1.5 cards
71.9%Bournemouth over 1.5 cards
54.0%Over 22.5 fouls

Split by side, Chelsea over 1.5 cards sits at 54.9% and Bournemouth at 71.9%. A red card for either side is rated at 17.8% (Chelsea 13.0%, Bournemouth 5.5%). Bournemouth’s most frequent referee this season, J Gillett, has averaged 4.5 cards a game across 2 of their matches; the appointment for this game is not known before kickoff. This season Chelsea have averaged 1.8 cards a game and Bournemouth 2.8.

Model lenses

The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.

The CalibratorRaw model read: 63.6% on Cards, graded against real out-of-sample results, no odds attached.
The Referee WatcherJ Gillett, Bournemouth’s most frequent referee this season, averages 4.5 cards a game. The appointment is not known before kickoff, so this is context, not a call.
The FlashpointAny red card is rated at 17.8%, a low-probability event, but one that reshapes every line when it lands.
The DisciplinarianBournemouth are the pick to collect more cards at 53.2%, bookings follow the side defending under pressure.

FAQ

How many cards in Chelsea vs Bournemouth?
The model rates over 3.5 total cards at 63.6% for Chelsea vs Bournemouth.

Will there be a red card in Chelsea vs Bournemouth?
The model rates a red card for either side at 17.8%.

Which team will pick up more cards in Chelsea vs Bournemouth?
The model rates Bournemouth to pick up more cards at 53.2%, with a level count at 18.8%.

How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.

Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.

Cards accuracy

How our Cards calls have actually done, each one scored against the real result on matches the model had never seen.

61.4%Best Cards call, hit rate
0.0223Calibration error
50,461Matches graded

In 10,143 matches we rated like this one (60–70%), Cards actually happened 65.7% of the time.

Predictions & track record updated 23 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →

Our last 10 Cards calls

Our most recent Cards calls, each one scored against the result. The model had never seen these matches when it made them. Green means we got it right, red means we got it wrong, and the number is how sure we were.

✗ 50.8%✗ 52.3%✗ 57.6%✓ 51.7%✓ 52.7%✗ 52.0%✗ 53.2%✓ 71.8%✓ 57.0%✗ 62.5%
4 of 10 recent calls hit.
Bournemouth vs Liverpool2026-09-20Over 3.5 50.8%Miss
Leeds vs Crystal Palace2026-09-20Under 3.5 52.3%Miss
Manchester City vs Sunderland2026-09-20Over 3.5 57.6%Miss
Fulham vs Manchester United2026-09-20Under 3.5 51.7%Hit
Leverkusen vs RB Leipzig2026-09-20Over 3.5 52.7%Hit

More Premier League, Cards

All Cards predictions →

Related

Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.