Chelsea vs Manchester United prediction

Premier League
ChelseaChelseaDLWWL
Sat, 31 Oct 202631/1012:30UK13°C · Cloudy
Manchester UnitedMan UtdLDDDL
42.7%Home winFair odds 2.34
24.4%DrawFair odds 4.09
32.8%Away winFair odds 3.05
Most likely published score1-111.2%Fair odds 8.96

MODELS TOP 3

Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.

Over 1.5 goalsBoth teams combined82.5%
Over 7.5 cornersBoth teams combined75.2%
Chelsea or draw67.2%

Early prediction · Model generated .

Our verdict

Road2Sushi's own call on this match: the likeliest result, how confident the model is, its strongest signals and the reasons behind them.

Every percentage is a model estimate and every fair price is 1 divided by that estimate. Neither is a bookmaker offer, and a model call is not a proven edge over the market.

Model pick

Chelsea
Match winner (1X2)42.7%
Fair odds2.34
Save model pickSaved to my bets

Top signals

Goals marketOver 1.5 goals
Model estimateModel82.5%
Fair oddsFair1.21
Corners marketOver 7.5 corners
Model estimateModel75.2%
Fair oddsFair1.33
Double chance marketChelsea or draw
Model estimateModel67.2%
Fair oddsFair1.49

Model read

An open result market: Chelsea lead at 42.7%, with draw 24.4% and Manchester United at 32.8%. No result has a majority of the model probability. Both Read full analysisShow less

An open result market: Chelsea lead at 42.7%, with draw 24.4% and Manchester United at 32.8%. No result has a majority of the model probability. Both teams to score stands out at 63.0%. The estimate leans this way, with substantial uncertainty remaining. Without a complete matching price comparison, this is an event read rather than a verified price opportunity. The overall match assessment has not cleared the model's betting filters; this market read does not override that decision.

Both teams to score

Model estimate
63.0%
Fair odds
1.59

Over 3.5 cards · both teams

Model estimate
61.8%
Fair odds
1.62

Over 2.5 goals

Model estimate
60.7%
Matching market
61.5%
Difference
-0.8 pp
Fair odds
1.65
Recorded odds
1.58

Margin-adjusted comparison for this selection. The difference is in percentage points, not a proven return.

Context & limits

  • Chelsea: 2 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • Manchester United: 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • The last 5 recorded meetings averaged 2.8 goals. This is a historical sample, not a forecast for this fixture.
  • Player watch: Benjamin Sesko (Manchester United) records 1.47 shots on target per 90 minutes over 3543 recorded minutes. This is a recent-form rate, not a guaranteed starting place or a price advantage.
  • A complete matching price comparison is unavailable for this selection, so a price edge cannot be established.
Additional match context

"Chelsea or Manchester United? We publish probabilities, not certainties." Chelsea versus Manchester United in the Premier League on 31 October 2026 is finely balanced. Chelsea edge it at 43%, but the gap to the field is slim. Worth knowing: bookmakers rate Chelsea higher (54%) than our model does. The goals profile is lively: Over 2.5 sits at 61% with both teams to score at 63%. On the availability front, Chelsea have Martinez ruled out, Sánchez ruled out, Jörgensen ruled out, James ruled out. The recent series reads 2 wins for Chelsea, 1 draws and 2 for Manchester United over 5 games, 2.8 goals on average. For shots markets, Cole Palmer is the obvious watch at 1.2 on target per 90 in recent data. Form guide over the last six: Chelsea W2 D1 L3, Manchester United W0 D4 L2. Verdict: no bet. Too extreme an outsider (fair 0.22).

Form & head-to-head

Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.

Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.

ChelseaChelseaLast 5
D
Draw · 2-2
L
Loss · 0-3
W
Win · 5-1
W
Win · 2-0
L
Loss · 0-2

2 wins · 1 draw · 2 losses

Manchester UnitedMan UtdLast 5
L
Loss · 0-1
D
Draw · 1-1
D
Draw · 1-1
D
Draw · 1-1
L
Loss · 0-3

0 wins · 3 draws · 2 losses

W Win
D Draw
L Loss

Head-to-head

Last 5 meetings

2ChelseaChelsea wins
1Draws
2Manchester UnitedMan Utd wins
2.8Average goals
Date
Home team
Score
Away team
ChelseaChelsea
0 – 1
Manchester UnitedMan Utd
Manchester UnitedMan Utd
2 – 1
ChelseaChelsea
ChelseaChelsea
1 – 0
Manchester UnitedMan Utd
Manchester UnitedMan Utd
1 – 1
ChelseaChelsea
ChelseaChelsea
4 – 3
Manchester UnitedMan Utd

Team news

Counts cover every listed player, including those behind Show all players. An unknown status is never counted as available.

Model availability, not a confirmed lineup.

Choose team
News view
ChelseaChelsea

12 listed players

Out / suspended
12
Doubtful
0
Available
0

Player availability

Player
Status
To play
Martinez
Out
0%
Sánchez
Out
0%
Jörgensen
Out
0%
James
Out
0%
Chalobah
Out
0%
B.Badiashile
Out
0%
Show all players (12)Show fewer players

Player
Status
To play
M.Sarr
Out
0%
Gittens
Out
0%
D.Essugo
Out
0%
João Pedro
Out
0%
Marc Guiu
Out
0%
Chavarria
Out
0%

Absence contribution

Player
Squad xG+xA share
João Pedro
37.1 xG+xA · 4,916 min
14.0%
Reece James
7.4 xG+xA · 3,128 min
2.8%
Emiliano Martinez
0.9 xG+xA · 5,761 min
0.3%
Robert Sánchez
0.9 xG+xA · 5,394 min
0.3%

Past contribution, not a change in win probability.

Manchester UnitedMan Utd

10 listed players

Out / suspended
9
Doubtful
1
Available
0

Player availability

Player
Status
To play
Bayindir
Out
0%
Dorgu
Out
0%
Shaw
Out
0%
Fredricson
Out
0%
Rashford
Doubtful
75%
Mainoo
Out
0%
Show all players (10)Show fewer players

Player
Status
To play
Ugarte
Out
0%
Collyer
Out
0%
Šeško
Out
0%
Obi
Out
0%

Absence contribution

Player
Squad xG+xA share
Patrick Dorgu
11.6 xG+xA · 3,616 min
4.3%
Kobbie Mainoo
4.2 xG+xA · 3,156 min
1.5%
Luke Shaw
3.4 xG+xA · 4,050 min
1.3%

Past contribution, not a change in win probability.

Most likely availability from independent sources. Missing updates do not mean every player is available.

Share of the squad’s expected goal involvement (xG + xA) this season. This describes past contribution, not a change in win probability.

Odds: model vs bookmaker

Every price for this match in one place: the model's probabilities next to the bookmaker's, the bookmaker's prices with our gap, and the model's own fair odds for each market.

Bookmaker probabilities are de-vigged (the margin is removed) and come from one bookmaker. A gap between the model and that bookmaker is a disagreement, not a proven edge. Fair odds are 1 divided by the model probability, not a bookmaker quote.

Model vs market

Model estimates and recorded bookmaker probabilities.

1X2, Goals, Corners, Cards and Shots: Bet365 prices via API-Football, observed 28 Oct 2026, 13:53 UTC, with the bookmaker margin taken out.

A market probability is the bookmaker's own price with its margin taken out, so the outcomes of each line add up to 100%. A gap from our model is a disagreement, not a proven edge: when we tested 1X2 and goal totals on matches the model had never seen, the bookmaker's closing price was more accurate. For corners, cards and shots we have no such test.

Cards: the bookmaker settles on its own card count, which may include red cards. Our model counts yellow cards only.

Shots: the bookmaker settles on its own shot count, which can differ from the match statistics our model learns from.

1X2

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 42.7%
Chelsea

Model minus market: -10.3 pp
Market probability: 53.0%
Model probability: 24.4%
Draw

Model minus market: -0.2 pp
Market probability: 24.6%
Model probability: 32.8%
Manchester United

Model minus market: +10.4 pp
Market probability: 22.4%

Goals

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 95.1%
Over 0.5 goals

Model minus market: -1.0 pp
Market probability: 96.1%
Model probability: 4.9%
Under 0.5 goals

Model minus market: +1.0 pp
Market probability: 3.9%
Model probability: 82.5%
Over 1.5 goals

Model minus market: -0.2 pp
Market probability: 82.7%
Model probability: 17.5%
Under 1.5 goals

Model minus market: +0.2 pp
Market probability: 17.3%
Model probability: 60.7%
Over 2.5 goals

Model minus market: -0.2 pp
Market probability: 60.8%
Model probability: 39.4%
Under 2.5 goals

Model minus market: +0.2 pp
Market probability: 39.2%
Model probability: 38.4%
Over 3.5 goals

Model minus market: -2.5 pp
Market probability: 40.9%
Model probability: 61.6%
Under 3.5 goals

Model minus market: +2.5 pp
Market probability: 59.1%
Model probability: 20.9%
Over 4.5 goals

Model minus market: +0.3 pp
Market probability: 20.6%
Model probability: 79.1%
Under 4.5 goals

Model minus market: -0.3 pp
Market probability: 79.4%
Model probability: 9.9%
Over 5.5 goals

Model minus market: -1.8 pp
Market probability: 11.7%
Model probability: 90.1%
Under 5.5 goals

Model minus market: +1.8 pp
Market probability: 88.3%
Model probability: 63.0%
Both teams to score · Yes

Model minus market: +1.3 pp
Market probability: 61.7%
Model probability: 37.0%
Both teams to score · No

Model minus market: -1.3 pp
Market probability: 38.3%

Cards

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 79.9%
Over 2.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 20.1%
Under 2.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 61.8%
Over 3.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 38.2%
Under 3.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 42.4%
Over 4.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: -9.2 pp
Market probability: 51.6%
Model probability: 57.6%
Under 4.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: +9.2 pp
Market probability: 48.4%
Model probability: 25.9%
Over 5.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 74.1%
Under 5.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Corners

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 75.2%
Over 7.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 24.8%
Under 7.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 64.4%
Over 8.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 35.6%
Under 8.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 52.8%
Over 9.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 47.2%
Under 9.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 41.4%
Over 10.5 corners

Model minus market: -2.4 pp
Market probability: 43.9%
Model probability: 58.6%
Under 10.5 corners

Model minus market: +2.4 pp
Market probability: 56.1%
Model probability: 31.1%
Over 11.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 68.9%
Under 11.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 22.4%
Over 12.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 77.6%
Under 12.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Shots

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 66.1%
Over 22.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 33.9%
Under 22.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 54.7%
Over 24.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 45.3%
Under 24.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 43.3%
Over 26.5 shots

Model minus market: -8.3 pp
Market probability: 51.6%
Model probability: 56.7%
Under 26.5 shots

Model minus market: +8.3 pp
Market probability: 48.4%
Model probability: 32.7%
Over 28.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 67.3%
Under 28.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 73.4%
Over 6.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 26.6%
Under 6.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 62.0%
Over 7.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 38.0%
Under 7.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 50.1%
Over 8.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 49.9%
Under 8.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 38.8%
Over 9.5 shots on target

Model minus market: -7.3 pp
Market probability: 46.1%
Model probability: 61.2%
Under 9.5 shots on target

Model minus market: +7.3 pp
Market probability: 53.9%

Bookmaker odds

Real bookmaker price (APIF:Pinnacle:4) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.

Gap is our probability minus the probability the bookmaker price implies (1 divided by the price), in percentage points. Because the price includes the margin, most gaps are negative. Model highlights are outcomes where our probability is at least 15 points higher. A gap is a disagreement, not a proven edge.

Match result · 1X2

Chelsea winBookmaker1.80Model fair2.34Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -12.8 pp
DrawBookmaker4.08Model fair4.09Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: +0.0 pp
Manchester United winBookmaker4.27Model fair3.05Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: +9.3 pp

Goals · 2.5

Over 2.5 goalsBookmaker1.58Model fair1.65Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -2.6 pp
Under 2.5 goalsBookmaker2.48Model fair2.54Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -0.9 pp

Model fair odds

Our published model probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote. Only the supported 1X2 calibration pool is calibrated; other markets retain their model estimates.

Match result

Chelsea win2.34
Draw4.09
Manchester United win3.05
Both teams to score1.59

Goals

Over 1.5 goals1.21
Over 2.5 goals1.65
Over 3.5 goals2.61
Over 4.5 goals4.79
Chelsea most2.41
Manchester United most2.96

Corners

Over 7.5 corners1.33
Over 8.5 corners1.55
Over 9.5 corners1.89
Over 10.5 corners2.41
Chelsea most1.97
Manchester United most2.56

Cards

Over 2.5 cards1.25
Over 3.5 cards1.62
Over 4.5 cards2.36
Over 5.5 cards3.86
Chelsea most3.01
Manchester United most2.13

Shots on target

Over 6.5 SoT1.36
Over 7.5 SoT1.61
Over 8.5 SoT1.99
Over 9.5 SoT2.58
Chelsea most2.02
Manchester United most2.60

Shots

Over 22.5 shots1.51
Over 24.5 shots1.83
Over 26.5 shots2.31
Over 28.5 shots3.06
Chelsea most1.80
Manchester United most2.59

Fouls

Over 20.5 fouls1.61
Over 22.5 fouls2.18
Over 24.5 fouls3.24

Corners

Both teams combined.

Over 7.5 corners75.2%1.33Very likely
Over 8.5 corners64.4%1.55Likely
Over 9.5 corners52.8%1.89Close call
Over 10.5 corners41.4%2.41Unlikely
Over 11.5 corners31.1%3.21Unlikely
Over 12.5 corners22.4%4.46Long shot
Read context

Both teams combined

Over 7.5 corners · Very likely

Over 8.5 corners · Likely

Over 9.5 corners · Close call

Over 10.5 corners · Unlikely

Over 11.5 corners · Unlikely

Over 12.5 corners · Long shot

Most corners

Each team has its own model probability; these outcomes are not renormalised.

Chelsea

Model probability

50.9%Fair odds 1.97

Manchester United

Model probability

39.1%Fair odds 2.56

Read context

Each team has its own model probability; these outcomes are not renormalised.

Chelsea

Manchester United

Shots

Both teams combined.

Over 22.5 shots66.1%1.51Likely
Over 24.5 shots54.7%1.83Close call
Over 26.5 shots43.3%2.31Unlikely
Over 28.5 shots32.7%3.06Unlikely
Read context

Both teams combined

Over 22.5 shots · Likely

Over 24.5 shots · Close call

Over 26.5 shots · Unlikely

Over 28.5 shots · Unlikely

What the model expects

The average number of shots and shots on target each team takes in the model's own distribution for this match, the same distribution the lines above come from. It is an average, not a betting line, and it is a model estimate, not a recorded result.

Model expected shots and shots on target, Chelsea vs Manchester United
Model expects Shots On target
Chelsea 13.5 4.6
Manchester United 12.1 4.2
Both teams 25.6 8.8

Recorded shots per game

Shots per game over each side's most recent league matches with shot data, and over the most recent matches at the venue of this match: Chelsea at home and Manchester United away. These are recorded results, not predictions, and a missing value is never shown as zero.

Recorded shots per game over recent league matches
Last 6 matches Shots Faced On target
Chelsea 12.0 12.2 5.2
Manchester United 16.8 11.7 4.0
Chelsea at home 12.7 11.3 5.3
Manchester United away 16.5 13.0 4.2

Totals line guide

Both teams combined.

Over 0.595.1%Over 1.582.5%Over 2.560.7%Over 3.538.4%Over 4.520.9%Over 5.59.9%
Recommended focusOver 2.560.7%

Discipline: Fairly priced. Too extreme an outsider (fair 0.22).

Read context

Both teams combined. Each bar uses the stored model estimate for that exact total-goals line. Missing estimates are unavailable; they are not zero.

Fair odds are the model’s own probability price, not a published bookmaker offer.

Market explorer

Model probabilities and fair odds.

Each bar is a specific Over selection for both teams combined. Its height is the model probability, on the same 0–100% scale.

Risk describes estimated likelihood, not profitability: low risk at least 62%, medium 48% to under 62%, high below 48%. Colors follow the actual estimate, even when a risk band is missing.

Up to four markets are selected from available model data, prioritising a spread of risk profiles. Fair odds are calculated from the model, not bookmaker prices: 1 divided by probability.

Scores are exact home-away outcomes from zero to five goals per team. Unavailable estimates stay blank; partial inputs are not expanded, inferred or normalised. Scores outside the matrix remain eligible for the top three.

Low riskMedium riskHigh risk

Goals

Over 1.51.5 goals, Low risk
Model probability 82.5%
Fair odds Fair 1.21
Over 2.52.5 goals, Medium risk
Model probability 60.7%
Fair odds Fair 1.65
Over 3.53.5 goals, High risk
Model probability 38.4%
Fair odds Fair 2.61

Cards

Over 2.52.5 cards, Low risk
Model probability 79.9%
Fair odds Fair 1.25
Over 3.53.5 cards, Medium risk
Model probability 61.8%
Fair odds Fair 1.62
Over 4.54.5 cards, High risk
Model probability 42.4%
Fair odds Fair 2.36

Corners

Over 7.57.5 corners, Low risk
Model probability 75.2%
Fair odds Fair 1.33
Over 9.59.5 corners, Medium risk
Model probability 52.8%
Fair odds Fair 1.89
Over 11.511.5 corners, High risk
Model probability 31.1%
Fair odds Fair 3.21

Shots on target

Over 6.56.5 shots on target, Low risk
Model probability 73.4%
Fair odds Fair 1.36
Over 8.58.5 shots on target, Medium risk
Model probability 50.1%
Fair odds Fair 1.99
Over 9.59.5 shots on target, High risk
Model probability 38.8%
Fair odds Fair 2.58
Correct score probabilitiesModel probability / Fair odds
Goal axes Home goals
Away goals 0 1 2 3 4 5
Away goals 0 0-04.9%Fair odds 20.41 1-06.7%Fair odds 14.97 2-06.0%Fair odds 16.75 3-03.3%Fair odds 30.30 4-01.4%Fair odds 72.99 5-00.5%Fair odds 217.39
Away goals 1 0-15.9%Fair odds 16.95 1-111.2%Fair odds 8.96 2-18.8%Fair odds 11.36 3-14.9%Fair odds 20.53 4-12.0%Fair odds 49.50 5-10.7%Fair odds 149.25
Away goals 2 0-24.7%Fair odds 21.10 1-27.9%Fair odds 12.74 2-26.5%Fair odds 15.36 3-23.6%Fair odds 27.78 4-21.5%Fair odds 66.67 5-20.5%Fair odds 200.00
Away goals 3 0-32.3%Fair odds 42.74 1-33.9%Fair odds 25.84 2-33.2%Fair odds 31.15 3-31.8%Fair odds 56.18 4-30.7%Fair odds 135.14 5-30.3%Fair odds 400.00
Away goals 4 0-40.9%Fair odds 114.94 1-41.4%Fair odds 69.44 2-41.2%Fair odds 84.03 3-40.7%Fair odds 151.52 4-40.3%Fair odds 357.14 5-40.1%Fair odds 1,111.11
Away goals 5 0-50.3%Fair odds 384.62 1-50.4%Fair odds 232.56 2-50.4%Fair odds 285.71 3-50.2%Fair odds 500.00 4-50.1%Fair odds 1,250.00 5-50.0%Fair odds 3,333.33

Model’s 3 most likely score outcomes

Model probability · Fair odds

1-1
Model probability11.2%
Fair odds8.96
2-1
Model probability8.8%
Fair odds11.36
1-2
Model probability7.9%
Fair odds12.74

Referee

One match referee is shown from an explicitly saved result or a fresh, identity-matched provider fixture. Previous referees are never used to guess an appointment. An API listing can change.

The referee’s totals count every completed match with this referee in our data: football-data.co.uk names the referee in English leagues, and API-Football names the referee of the same match (same teams, date and score) in every league from 2025/26. A rate needs at least 5 matches with that figure.

The team table shows each team’s published history with that same referee only. Matches, team cards per game and match cards per game are separate fields; their available samples can differ. Missing values are not zero. Cards include yellow and red cards in the current historical source.

Referee not confirmed

No referee assignment is confirmed in our data yet. We never guess one from past matches.

Season stats

2026/27 season. Recorded results, not model estimates.

ChelseaChelsea
Manchester UnitedMan Utd

Overview

Statistic
Chelsea
Manchester United
League position
#5 of 20
#16 of 20
Matches played
8
8
Record W-D-L
4-1-3
1-4-3
Recent form
DLWWL
Last 5 matches
LDDDL
Last 5 matches
Current streak
L1
L1
Points per game
1.62
0.88
Record, home vs away
2-1-1
0-3-1
PPG, home vs away
1.75
0.75

PPG scale: 0–3 points per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Show all season statsHide season stats

Goals

Statistic
Chelsea
Manchester United
Goals scored per game
2.12
1.25
Goals conceded per game
1.88
1.62
Scored, home vs away
2.75
1.00
Conceded, home vs away
2.00
1.50
1st half goals per game
1.12
0.25
2nd half goals per game
1.00
1.00
xG for per game
1.55
1.67
xG against per game
1.69
1.65

Scale: 0–3 goals or expected goals (xG) per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Shooting

Statistic
Chelsea
Manchester United
Shots per game
13.4
19.4
Shots faced per game
12.8
10.9
Shots on target per game
5.4
5.0
1st half shots per game
5.9
6.6
2nd half shots per game
7.8
12.9

Scale: 0–20 shots per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Corners & discipline

Statistic
Chelsea
Manchester United
Corners won per game
5.6
6.0
Cards per game
—
2.0
Fouls per game
9.9
10.0
Red cards this season
—
0

0–10 corners per game; 0–5 cards per game; 0–20 fouls per game Each team uses the same scale independently.

Goal rates

Statistic
Chelsea
Manchester United
Over 2.5 rate
75.0%
37.5%
BTTS rate
62.5%
62.5%
Clean sheets
12.5%
0.0%

Scale: 0–100% of recorded matches, not model estimates. Each team uses the same scale independently.

League averages this season: 2.77 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 50.0% · BTTS in 50.0%. Full league tables & stats →

First half / second half

Averages per game in this season’s league matches, split at half-time. Games is the number of each team’s matches with verified half data for that row; below five matches the row stays blank, and a missing value is never a zero.

Corners, shots on target and yellow cards per half come from the data provider’s half-by-half match statistics and are only used when the two halves add up to the full-time count. Cards are split by the minute they were shown, and first-half stoppage time counts as the first half. These are recorded results, not predictions.

In the Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, Serie A and Ligue 1 the shots per half come from a different source than the match shot totals, so the two can differ slightly.

ChelseaChelsea
Chelsea: season average per game by half
Per game 1H 2H Games
Goals scoredScored 1.12 1.00 8
Goals concededConceded 0.62 1.25 8
Shots 5.9 7.8 8
Shots facedOpp. shots 6.0 6.6 8
Shots on targetOn target 3.1 2.3 8
Shots on target facedOpp. on target 3.0 2.6 8
Corners wonCorners 2.8 2.9 8
Corners concededOpp. corners 2.8 2.8 8
Yellow cardsYellows 1.0 0.9 7
Opponent yellow cardsOpp. yellows 0.7 2.3 7
Manchester UnitedMan Utd
Manchester United: season average per game by half
Per game 1H 2H Games
Goals scoredScored 0.25 1.00 8
Goals concededConceded 0.62 1.00 8
Shots 6.6 12.9 8
Shots facedOpp. shots 5.4 5.6 8
Shots on targetOn target 1.6 3.4 8
Shots on target facedOpp. on target 2.5 1.9 8
Corners wonCorners 1.6 4.4 8
Corners concededOpp. corners 1.8 1.9 8
Yellow cardsYellows 0.8 1.3 8
Opponent yellow cardsOpp. yellows 1.1 1.3 8

Players to watch

Published player-market probabilities, shown in kickoff order. Model estimates, not confirmed lineups.

How our football predictions work →

A watch list, not a confirmed lineup.

ChelseaChelsea (3)
Cole Palmer
Watch list
Prediction markets
Model %
Fair odds
Save
To score
27.6%
3.62
1+ shot on target
67.0%
1.49
2+ shots
80.1%
1.25
Per 90 minutes (recent averages)
Shots3.25
On target1.20
Goals0.35
Estêvão
Watch list
Prediction markets
Model %
Fair odds
Save
To score
6.8%
14.71
1+ shot on target
30.0%
3.33
2+ shots
30.3%
3.30
Per 90 minutes (recent averages)
Shots3.13
On target1.01
Goals0.20
Danny Welbeck
Watch list
Prediction markets
Model %
Fair odds
Save
To score
23.4%
4.27
1+ shot on target
45.8%
2.18
2+ shots
41.1%
2.43
Per 90 minutes (recent averages)
Shots2.16
On target0.94
Goals0.41
Manchester UnitedMan Utd (3)
Benjamin Sesko
Watch list
Prediction markets
Model %
Fair odds
Save
To score
32.1%
3.12
1+ shot on target
62.5%
1.60
2+ shots
59.4%
1.68
Per 90 minutes (recent averages)
Shots3.00
On target1.47
Goals0.58
Matheus Cunha
Watch list
Prediction markets
Model %
Fair odds
Save
To score
28.8%
3.47
1+ shot on target
66.5%
1.50
2+ shots
78.9%
1.27
Per 90 minutes (recent averages)
Shots3.45
On target1.29
Goals0.40
Marcus Rashford
Watch list
Prediction markets
Model %
Fair odds
Save
To score
16.7%
5.99
1+ shot on target
43.5%
2.30
2+ shots
47.9%
2.09
Per 90 minutes (recent averages)
Shots3.62
On target1.28
Goals0.41
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots

Over 22.5 66.1% Over 24.5 54.7% Over 26.5 43.3% Over 28.5 32.7%
Most: Chelsea 55.7% Most: Manchester United 38.6%
Chelsea Over 10.5 71.0%
Chelsea Over 12.5 55.7%
Chelsea Over 14.5 40.5% Manchester United Over 10.5 60.0%
Manchester United Over 12.5 43.3%
Manchester United Over 14.5 28.8%

Shots on target

Over 6.5 73.4% Over 7.5 62.0% Over 8.5 50.1% Over 9.5 38.8%
Most: Chelsea 49.5% Most: Manchester United 38.5%
Chelsea Over 3.5 64.1%
Chelsea Over 4.5 47.6%
Chelsea Over 5.5 32.8% Manchester United Over 3.5 56.7%
Manchester United Over 4.5 39.6%
Manchester United Over 5.5 25.6%

Cards

Over 2.5 79.9% Over 3.5 61.8% Over 4.5 42.4% Over 5.5 25.9%
Most: Chelsea 33.3% Most: Manchester United 47.1%
Chelsea Over 1.5 58.1%
Chelsea Over 2.5 31.0% Manchester United Over 1.5 67.4%
Manchester United Over 2.5 41.0%

Chelsea: players to watch (recent-form projection)

Each number is the player’s recent rate per 90 minutes, scaled to how long we expect them to play. Only players in this season’s squad appear. It is a projection from recent form, not a confirmed lineup: nobody has announced the team yet.

Player Shots/90 SoT/90 Goals/90 1+ SoT 2+ shots To score
Cole Palmer 3.25 1.2 0.35 67.0% 80.1% 27.6%
Estêvão 3.13 1.01 0.2 30.0% 30.3% 6.8%
Danny Welbeck 2.16 0.94 0.41 45.8% 41.1% 23.4%
Enzo Fernández 1.95 0.79 0.25 52.4% 54.7% 20.9%
Morgan Rogers 1.98 0.71 0.28 50.2% 57.8% 24.0%

Manchester United: players to watch (recent-form projection)

Each number is the player’s recent rate per 90 minutes, scaled to how long we expect them to play. Only players in this season’s squad appear. It is a projection from recent form, not a confirmed lineup: nobody has announced the team yet.

Player Shots/90 SoT/90 Goals/90 1+ SoT 2+ shots To score
Benjamin Sesko 3 1.47 0.58 62.5% 59.4% 32.1%
Matheus Cunha 3.45 1.29 0.4 66.5% 78.9% 28.8%
Marcus Rashford 3.62 1.28 0.41 43.5% 47.9% 16.7%
Bryan Mbeumo 2.46 1.05 0.4 63.2% 67.9% 31.7%
Bruno Fernandes 2.64 0.81 0.3 54.2% 72.3% 25.1%

Clean sheet & win to nil

Worked out from the scoreline grid above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the other side fails to score. It is the model’s own percentage, scored against the result afterwards, and it is not a tip.

Chelsea clean sheet 22.7%
Manchester United clean sheet 19.0%
Chelsea win to nil 17.8%
Manchester United win to nil 14.1%

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

The model’s own percentages, with no odds attached. The smaller markets are here so you can see everything we hold a number on, not because we claim an advantage in them. The colour says how close our percentages have landed to reality on matches the model had never seen. This is the raw model spectrum. Its match-result marginal can differ from the published 1X2 above; it does not replace the saved prediction.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 41.6% draw 24.7% away 33.8%
double_chance
1X 66.2% 12 75.4% X2 58.4%
dnb
home 55.2% away 44.8%
btts
yes 63.0% no 37.0%
clean_sheet
home 22.9% away 19.1%
win_to_nil
home 18.0% away 14.2%
winning_margin
home_by_1 19.9% home_by_2 12.6% home_by_3plus 9.0%
away_by_1 17.7% away_by_2 10.0% away_by_3plus 6.1%
correct_score
0-0 4.9% 0-1 5.9% 0-2 4.7%
0-3 2.3% 0-4 0.9% 0-5 0.3%
1-0 6.7% 1-1 11.2% 1-2 7.9%
1-3 3.9% 1-4 1.4% 1-5 0.4%
2-0 6.0% 2-1 8.8% 2-2 6.5%
2-3 3.2% 2-4 1.2% 2-5 0.4%
3-0 3.3% 3-1 4.9% 3-2 3.6%
3-3 1.8% 3-4 0.7% 3-5 0.2%
4-0 1.4% 4-1 2.0% 4-2 1.5%
4-3 0.7% 4-4 0.3% 4-5 0.1%
5-0 0.5% 5-1 0.7% 5-2 0.5%
5-3 0.3% 5-4 0.1% 5-5 0.0%
other 1.2%
likeliest_score
h 100.0% a 100.0% p 11.2%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 95.1% under_0.5 4.9% over_1.5 82.5%
under_1.5 17.5% over_2.5 60.7% under_2.5 39.4%
over_3.5 38.4% under_3.5 61.6% over_4.5 20.9%
under_4.5 79.1% over_5.5 9.9% under_5.5 90.1%
odd_even
odd 48.8% even 51.2%
team_home
over_0.5 80.9% under_0.5 19.1% over_1.5 49.4%
under_1.5 50.6% over_2.5 23.2% under_2.5 76.8%
team_away
over_0.5 77.1% under_0.5 22.9% over_1.5 43.5%
under_1.5 56.5% over_2.5 18.6% under_2.5 81.4%
most
home 41.6% draw 24.7% away 33.8%
handicap
home_-2.5 9.0% away_+2.5 91.0% home_-1.5 21.6%
away_+1.5 78.4% home_-0.5 41.6% away_+0.5 58.4%
home_+0.5 66.2% away_-0.5 33.8% home_+1.5 83.9%
away_-1.5 16.1% home_+2.5 93.9% away_-2.5 6.1%
total_exact
exact_0 4.9% exact_1 12.6% exact_2 21.9%
exact_3 22.3% exact_4 17.5% exact_5 11.0%
exact_6 5.8% exact_7plus 4.1%
First half range, not a point
1×2
home 38.8% draw 40.3% away 20.9%
total
over_0.5 71.3% under_0.5 28.7% over_1.5 35.5%
under_1.5 64.5% over_2.5 13.1% under_2.5 86.9%
btts
yes 20.5% no 79.5%
total_exact
exact_0 28.7% exact_1 35.8% exact_2 22.4%
exact_3 9.3% exact_4plus 3.8%
Second half range, not a point
1×2
home 32.8% draw 30.8% away 36.4%
total
over_0.5 86.5% under_0.5 13.5% over_1.5 59.4%
under_1.5 40.6% over_2.5 32.3% under_2.5 67.7%
btts
yes 39.9% no 60.1%
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
H/H 27.8% H/D 6.9% H/A 4.1%
D/H 13.2% D/D 12.4% D/A 14.6%
A/H 2.1% A/D 3.8% A/A 15.0%
Corners range, not a point
total
over_7.5 75.2% under_7.5 24.8% over_8.5 64.4%
under_8.5 35.6% over_9.5 52.8% under_9.5 47.2%
over_10.5 41.4% under_10.5 58.6% over_11.5 31.1%
under_11.5 68.9% over_12.5 22.4% under_12.5 77.6%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 72.1% under_3.5 28.0% over_4.5 57.3%
under_4.5 42.7% over_5.5 42.8% under_5.5 57.2%
team_away
over_3.5 64.3% under_3.5 35.7% over_4.5 48.3%
under_4.5 51.7% over_5.5 33.8% under_5.5 66.2%
most
home 50.9% draw 10.0% away 39.1%
handicap
home_-3.5 23.1% away_+3.5 76.9% home_-1.5 40.8%
away_+1.5 59.2% home_-0.5 50.9% away_+0.5 49.1%
home_+0.5 60.9% away_-0.5 39.1% home_+1.5 70.3%
away_-1.5 29.7% home_+3.5 85.0% away_-3.5 15.0%
Shots range, not a point
total
over_22.5 66.1% under_22.5 33.9% over_24.5 54.7%
under_24.5 45.3% over_26.5 43.3% under_26.5 56.7%
over_28.5 32.7% under_28.5 67.3%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_10.5 71.0% under_10.5 29.0% over_12.5 55.7%
under_12.5 44.4% over_14.5 40.5% under_14.5 59.6%
team_away
over_10.5 60.0% under_10.5 40.0% over_12.5 43.3%
under_12.5 56.7% over_14.5 28.8% under_14.5 71.2%
most
home 55.7% draw 5.7% away 38.6%
handicap
home_-4.5 32.9% away_+4.5 67.1% home_-2.5 44.1%
away_+2.5 55.9% home_-0.5 55.7% away_+0.5 44.3%
home_+0.5 61.4% away_-0.5 38.6% home_+2.5 72.0%
away_-2.5 28.0% home_+4.5 80.9% away_-4.5 19.1%
Shots on target range, not a point
total
over_6.5 73.4% under_6.5 26.6% over_7.5 62.0%
under_7.5 38.0% over_8.5 50.1% under_8.5 49.9%
over_9.5 38.8% under_9.5 61.2%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 64.1% under_3.5 35.9% over_4.5 47.6%
under_4.5 52.4% over_5.5 32.8% under_5.5 67.2%
team_away
over_3.5 56.7% under_3.5 43.4% over_4.5 39.6%
under_4.5 60.4% over_5.5 25.6% under_5.5 74.4%
most
home 49.5% draw 12.0% away 38.5%
handicap
home_-2.5 26.9% away_+2.5 73.1% home_-0.5 49.5%
away_+0.5 50.5% home_+0.5 61.6% away_-0.5 38.5%
home_+2.5 81.6% away_-2.5 18.4%
Cards calibrated
total
over_2.5 79.9% under_2.5 20.1% over_3.5 61.8%
under_3.5 38.2% over_4.5 42.4% under_4.5 57.6%
over_5.5 25.9% under_5.5 74.1%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_1.5 58.1% under_1.5 41.9% over_2.5 31.0%
under_2.5 69.0%
team_away
over_1.5 67.4% under_1.5 32.6% over_2.5 41.0%
under_2.5 59.0%
most
home 33.3% draw 19.7% away 47.1%
handicap
home_-1.5 17.5% away_+1.5 82.5% home_-0.5 33.3%
away_+0.5 66.7% home_+0.5 52.9% away_-0.5 47.1%
home_+1.5 71.7% away_-1.5 28.3%
Fouls calibrated
total
over_20.5 62.1% under_20.5 37.9% over_22.5 46.0%
under_22.5 54.0% over_24.5 30.9% under_24.5 69.1%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_9.5 62.6% under_9.5 37.4% over_11.5 39.5%
under_11.5 60.5% over_13.5 20.7% under_13.5 79.3%
team_away
over_9.5 69.3% under_9.5 30.7% over_11.5 46.9%
under_11.5 53.1% over_13.5 26.6% under_13.5 73.4%
most
home 40.7% draw 8.1% away 51.2%
handicap
home_-3.5 19.8% away_+3.5 80.2% home_-0.5 40.7%
away_+0.5 59.3% home_+2.5 64.8% away_-2.5 35.2%
Red card range, not a point
any
yes 24.5% no 75.5%
home
yes 21.2% no 78.9%
away
yes 4.2% no 95.8%
Method, limits & performance

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0106 (56038 matches).

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match