Rotherham 1-4 Gillingham corners: our prediction vs the result
Pre-match model estimates. Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.
Result
Rotherham1-4Gillingham
We called Under 9.5 at 51.0% and it landed (4 in the match).
Model read
Close to a coin-flip, barely a lean.
Conviction is how far the model's probability sits from an even 50/50: Strong at 18 points or more, Moderate at 8 points or more, Lean below that.
Conviction: Lean
Over 9.5 corners49.0%
Corners
Model probabilities for this match. Over means more than the stated line; Under means fewer. For example, over 2.5 requires at least 3. These estimates are not bookmaker odds.
Corners track territory and shot volume more than the scoreline, below are the model total-corner probabilities. It leans to Rotherham.
Total corners
Both teams combined.
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 corners | 72.4% | 27.6% |
| 8.5 corners | 61.0% | 39.1% |
| 9.5 corners | 49.0% | 51.0% |
| 10.5 corners | 37.6% | 62.4% |
| 11.5 corners | 27.6% | 72.5% |
| 12.5 corners | 19.3% | 80.7% |
Who wins the corner count
RotherhamGillinghamTeam corners lines
Rotherham
Gillingham
Corner handicap
The four handicap lines closest to an even split. The line is Rotherham's; Gillingham gets the opposite line. Half lines have no push.
| Rotherham line | Rotherham | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| -1.5 | 44.0% | 56.0% |
| -0.5 | 55.1% | 44.9% |
| +0.5 | 65.7% | 34.3% |
| +1.5 | 75.3% | 24.7% |
Corner trends
2026/27 · Recorded results. At this venue means Rotherham at home and Gillingham away. A rate appears only after five matches with the figure, three for the home or away split; a missing value is never zero.
Bar scales · Corners per game: 0–10. Each team uses the same scale for each metric.
Corners accuracy
How our Corners calls have actually done, each one scored against the real result on matches the model had never seen.
In 21,932 matches we rated like this one (40–50%), Corners actually happened 47.7% of the time.
Predictions & track record updated 27 Oct 2026.
Our last 10 Corners calls
Our most recent Corners calls, each one scored against the result. The model had never seen these matches when it made them. Green means we got it right, red means we got it wrong, and the number is how sure we were.
Model analysis: reasoning, key facts and model lenses
Expert AI analysis
Our model lands on Over 9.5 corners at 49.0%, its strongest read on the Corners market. Line by line, the read runs from 72.4% for over 7.5 to 19.3% for over 12.5, with over 9.5 the closest line to a coin-flip at 49.0%. Head to head on corners, Rotherham are the model’s pick to win the corner count at 55.1%, with a level count at 10.7%. The published percentage is an estimate, not a guarantee or a measured hit rate.
In-depth analysis
For the team lines, Rotherham over 4.5 corners sits at 58.4% and Gillingham at 42.7%. This season Rotherham have averaged 3.9 corners won a game and Gillingham 3.6.
Every figure here is what the model thinks, not advice. We score every call against the result after the match.
Model lenses
The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.
This season
2026/27 · Recorded results.
Bar scales · Corners per game: 0–10. Each team uses the same scale for each metric.
FAQ
How many corners in Rotherham vs Gillingham?
Which team will win the corner count in Rotherham vs Gillingham?
How many corners do Rotherham and Gillingham average this season?
How is this probability calculated?
Is this a betting tip?
More League Two, Corners
Related
Model estimates; validation depends on the market and available sample. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.
