Rotherham 1-4 Gillingham correct score: our prediction vs the result
Pre-match model estimates. Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.
Result
Rotherham1-4Gillingham
Final score 1-4. The model gave that exact scoreline 1.0%.
Model read
No single outcome dominates, read the distribution.
Conviction: Open
Most likely · 13.6%1-1
Correct score
Score distribution: the model probability of each exact score.
Rows = Rotherham goals, columns = Gillingham goals. The most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 13.6%.
No exact score is ever truly likely; the value is in the full distribution the model assigns. Read the heatmap as a map of likelihood, not a prediction of one score.
Most likely scorelines
- 1-113.6%
- 1-010.0%
- 0-110.0%
- 0-09.4%
- 2-17.9%
- 1-27.9%
- 2-06.5%
- 0-26.5%
Score probability grid
| H / A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9.4% | 10% | 6.5% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| 1 | 10% | 13.6% | 7.9% | 3.2% | 1% | 0.2% |
| 2 | 6.5% | 7.9% | 4.8% | 2% | 0.6% | 0.1% |
| 3 | 2.7% | 3.2% | 2% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| 4 | 0.8% | 1% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 5 | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Rows: Rotherham · Columns: Gillingham
Goals distribution
How likely each total number of goals is, according to the model. Every goals market on this page is built from these bars. The 5+ bar covers every result with five goals or more.
0
1
2
3
4
5+
Form & head-to-head
Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.
Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.
L
D
W
D
L
1 win · 2 draws · 2 losses
W
W
W
L
D
3 wins · 1 draw · 1 loss
Head-to-head
No recorded head-to-head results available.
Overall model accuracy
We don't yet publish a graded Correct Score-specific track record, so this is our overall accuracy across every 1X2 call, graded out-of-sample, updated daily.
Predictions & track record updated 27 Oct 2026.
Model analysis: reasoning, key facts and model lenses
Expert AI analysis
The headline read is Most likely · 13.6% at 1-1, its strongest read on the Correct Score market. It is driven by both attacks and defences: Rotherham have averaged 1.0 scored and 1.2 conceded, Gillingham 1.8 and 0.8 over their recent games. That fits a tighter goals environment: 44.0% for over 2.5 and 70.6% for at least two goals. This is a model estimate; validation depends on the market and available sample.
In-depth analysis
For the goal environment, the model sees 44.0% for three or more goals and 70.6% for at least two, painting a lower-scoring picture. With Rotherham favoured at 35.8%, neither side dominating can mean an end-to-end match.
We publish the model, not a sure thing. We score every call against the result after the match.
Model lenses
The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.
FAQ
What was the score in Rotherham vs Gillingham?
How is this probability calculated?
Is this a betting tip?
More League Two, Correct Score
Related
Model estimates; validation depends on the market and available sample. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.
