Middlesbrough vs Wolves prediction & probabilities (2026-10-10)

Championship

Middlesbrough vs Wolves Cards

2026-10-10 · 15:00
Cards46.5%Over 3.5 cards
Best predictionOver 3.5 cards · 46.5%Close to a coin-flip, barely a lean. Calibrated, not a tip.
47%

model probability

ConvictionLean

Expert AI analysis

The headline read is Over 3.5 cards at 46.5%, its strongest read on the Cards market. Across the lines, the model goes from 68.1% for over 2.5 to 14.4% for over 5.5, with over 3.5 the closest line to a coin-flip at 46.5%. Head to head on cards, Wolves are the model’s pick to pick up more cards at 46.4%, with a level count at 21.9%. These are the model’s own calibrated numbers, not betting advice.

Cards (bookings)

Over 2.568.1%

Over 3.546.5%

Over 4.527.6%

Over 5.514.4%

Total cards, every line

Line Over Under
2.5 cards 68.1% 31.9%
3.5 cards 46.5% 53.5%
4.5 cards 27.6% 72.4%
5.5 cards 14.4% 85.7%

Who picks up more cards

Middlesbrough31.7%

Level21.9%

★ ModelWolves46.4%

Team card lines

Middlesbrough over 1.5

46.7%

Middlesbrough over 2.5

21.0%

Wolves over 1.5

57.6%

Wolves over 2.5

30.6%

Card handicap

Middlesbrough line Middlesbrough Wolves
-1.5 15.1% 84.9%
-0.5 31.7% 68.3%
+0.5 53.6% 46.4%
+1.5 74.0% 26.0%

Red card

Any red card4.0%

Middlesbrough red card0.9%

Wolves red card3.1%

Fouls

Line Over Under
20.5 fouls 62.1% 37.9%
22.5 fouls 46.4% 53.6%
24.5 fouls 31.7% 68.3%

Recent referees

The referees each side has met most this season, with cards per game overall and for that team. We never claim who officiates this match: the appointment is not known before kickoff.

Team Referee Games Cards/g Team cards/g
Middlesbrough R Madley 2 2.0 0.5

This season (2026/27)

1.0Middlesbrough cards per game
10.0Middlesbrough fouls per game
1.0Wolves cards per game
12.4Wolves fouls per game

Card markets are softer and less efficiently priced than goals, these are the model total-booking probabilities for Middlesbrough vs Wolves. It tips Wolves for the most cards.

In-depth analysis

These are the model’s own percentages, not tips. We score every call against the result after the match.

46.5%Over 3.5 cards
4.0%Any red card
46.4%Most cards: Wolves
46.7%Middlesbrough over 1.5 cards
57.6%Wolves over 1.5 cards
46.4%Over 22.5 fouls

For the team lines, Middlesbrough over 1.5 cards sits at 46.7% and Wolves at 57.6%. A red card for either side is rated at 4.0% (Middlesbrough 0.9%, Wolves 3.1%). Middlesbrough’s most frequent referee this season, R Madley, has averaged 2.0 cards a game across 2 of their matches; the appointment for this game is not known before kickoff. This season Middlesbrough have averaged 1.0 cards a game and Wolves 1.0.

Model lenses

The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.

The CalibratorRaw model read: 46.5% on Cards, graded against real out-of-sample results, no odds attached.
The Referee WatcherR Madley, Middlesbrough’s most frequent referee this season, averages 2.0 cards a game. The appointment is not known before kickoff, so this is context, not a call.
The FlashpointAny red card is rated at 4.0%, a low-probability event, but one that reshapes every line when it lands.
The DisciplinarianWolves are the pick to collect more cards at 46.4%, the side chasing the game tends to foul more.

FAQ

How many cards in Middlesbrough vs Wolves?
The model rates over 3.5 total cards at 46.5% for Middlesbrough vs Wolves.

Will there be a red card in Middlesbrough vs Wolves?
The model rates a red card for either side at 4.0%.

Which team will pick up more cards in Middlesbrough vs Wolves?
The model rates Wolves to pick up more cards at 46.4%, with a level count at 21.9%.

How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.

Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.

Cards accuracy

How our Cards calls have actually done, each one scored against the real result on matches the model had never seen.

61.4%Best Cards call, hit rate
0.0223Calibration error
50,461Matches graded

In 10,197 matches we rated like this one (40–50%), Cards actually happened 48.5% of the time.

Predictions & track record updated 22 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →

Our last 10 Cards calls

Our most recent Cards calls, each one scored against the result. The model had never seen these matches when it made them. Green means we got it right, red means we got it wrong, and the number is how sure we were.

✗ 50.8%✗ 52.3%✗ 57.6%✓ 51.7%✓ 52.7%✗ 52.0%✗ 53.2%✓ 71.8%✓ 57.0%✗ 62.5%
4 of 10 recent calls hit.
Bournemouth vs Liverpool2026-09-20Over 3.5 50.8%Miss
Leeds vs Crystal Palace2026-09-20Under 3.5 52.3%Miss
Manchester City vs Sunderland2026-09-20Over 3.5 57.6%Miss
Fulham vs Manchester United2026-09-20Under 3.5 51.7%Hit
Leverkusen vs RB Leipzig2026-09-20Over 3.5 52.7%Hit

More Championship, Cards

All Cards predictions →

Related

Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.