Chesterfield vs York Double Chance
Part of a bigger picture: see the full match page, where this comes from.
Result
The highest-probability cover, Chesterfield or Draw (83.5%), landed.
model probability
Expert AI analysis
The model makes Home or Draw at 83.5%, its strongest read on the Double Chance market. For context, Chesterfield are favoured at 60.5%, so game state could swing this market. Calibrated against real results, we show the read, not a sure thing.
Double Chance
Draw no bet
Draw no bet means a draw gives you your stake back. So we take the draw out and share what is left between the two sides.
Winning margin
| Margin | Probability |
|---|---|
| Chesterfield by 1 | 24.3% |
| Chesterfield by 2 | 18.8% |
| Chesterfield by 3+ | 17.4% |
| York by 1 | 11.1% |
| York by 2 | 4.1% |
| York by 3+ | 1.3% |
| Draw | 23.0% |
Goal handicap
| Chesterfield line | Chesterfield | York |
|---|---|---|
| -2.5 | 17.4% | 82.6% |
| -1.5 | 36.2% | 63.8% |
| -0.5 | 60.5% | 39.5% |
| +0.5 | 83.5% | 16.5% |
This season (2026/27)
Two of three outcomes covered, lower odds, higher strike rate. The highest-probability cover is Chesterfield or draw on the model numbers.
In-depth analysis
These are the model’s own percentages, not tips. The track record is public, misses included.
For context, Chesterfield are favoured at 60.5%. We lean on calibration, not the favourite tag.
Model lenses
The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.
Form & head-to-head
FAQ
Which double chance landed in Chesterfield vs York?
Home or Draw was the highest-probability cover at 83.5%; it landed, final score 2-0.
How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.
Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.
Double Chance accuracy
How our Double Chance calls have actually done, each one scored against the real result on matches the model had never seen.
In 11,098 matches we rated like this one (80–90%), Double Chance actually happened 83.1% of the time.
Predictions & track record updated 22 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →
Our last 10 Double Chance calls
Our most recent Double Chance calls, each one scored against the result. The model had never seen these matches when it made them. Green means we got it right, red means we got it wrong, and the number is how sure we were.
More League Two, Double Chance
Related
Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.

