Eldense 4-1 Oviedo correct score: our prediction vs the result
Pre-match model estimates. Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.
Result
Final score 4-1. The model gave that exact scoreline 1.4%.
Model read
No single outcome dominates, read the distribution.
Conviction: Open
Most likely · 13.3%1-1
Correct score
Score distribution: the model probability of each exact score.
Rows = Eldense goals, columns = Oviedo goals. The most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 13.3%.
Rather than one score, the model spreads probability across the whole grid, that distribution is the real signal. Read the heatmap as a map of likelihood, not a prediction of one score.
Most likely scorelines
- 1-113.3%
- 1-010.9%
- 0-08.9%
- 2-18.8%
- 0-18.5%
- 2-08.0%
- 1-27.0%
- 0-25.0%
Score probability grid
| H / A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8.9% | 8.5% | 5% | 1.8% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| 1 | 10.9% | 13.3% | 7% | 2.6% | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| 2 | 8% | 8.8% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| 3 | 3.7% | 4.1% | 2.3% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| 4 | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 5 | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Rows: Eldense · Columns: Oviedo
Goals distribution
How likely each total number of goals is, according to the model. Every goals market on this page is built from these bars. The 5+ bar covers every result with five goals or more.
0
1
2
3
4
5+
Form & head-to-head
Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.
Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.
L
D
W
L
L
1 win · 1 draw · 3 losses
W
D
W
L
W
3 wins · 1 draw · 1 loss
Head-to-head
Last 4 meetings
Overall model accuracy
We don't yet publish a graded Correct Score-specific track record, so this is our overall accuracy across every 1X2 call, graded out-of-sample, updated daily.
Predictions & track record updated 27 Oct 2026.
Model analysis: reasoning, key facts and model lenses
Expert AI analysis
Our model lands on Most likely · 13.3% at 1-1, its strongest read on the Correct Score market. Recent output points the same way: Eldense have averaged 0.4 scored and 0.8 conceded, Oviedo 1.4 and 0.6 over their recent games. That fits a balanced goals environment: 45.4% for over 2.5 and 71.7% for at least two goals. Their last 4 meetings have averaged 2.0 goals a game. Read the recorded data and validation context alongside the estimate.
In-depth analysis
On the goals side, the model sees 45.4% for three or more goals and 71.7% for at least two, painting a balanced picture. Given Eldense favoured at 42.8%, neither side dominating can mean an end-to-end match.
We publish the model, not a sure thing. What we are good at is getting the percentage right, not at beating the bookmakers.
Model lenses
The same numbers read in different ways by one model. These are not separate tipsters, and none of them is a tip.
FAQ
What was the score in Eldense vs Oviedo?
How is this probability calculated?
Is this a betting tip?
More Segunda División, Correct Score
Related
Model estimates; validation depends on the market and available sample. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.


