Orgryte 4-2 GAIS: result, our prediction

Allsvenskan
OrgryteOrgryteLDLLL
Full time4-2Sun, 18 Oct 202618/1015:30UK
GAISGAISWDLWL
23.3%Home winFair odds 4.29
28.2%DrawFair odds 3.55
48.5%Away winFair odds 2.06
Pre-match: Most likely published score0-113.2%Fair odds 7.58

Pre-match model estimates · MODELS TOP 3

Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.

Under 3.5 goalsBoth teams combined79.2%
Draw or GAIS76.7%
Over 1.5 goalsBoth teams combined68.4%

Post-match analysis

Judged against the prediction this page published before kickoff. Right or wrong, it stays on the record.

A call is the side our published probability favoured. If we leaned towards under and three goals went in, that counts as a miss.

OrgryteOrgryte
4-2FT
GAISGAIS

Match data

Match data: Orgryte and GAIS
OrgryteOrgryte Statistic GAISGAIS
4 Goals 2
1 Goals, 1st half 1
3 Goals, 2nd half 1

RefereeOscar Johnson

The result, on the record

Recorded tally 1 of 5 published calls on this match were right.

Published calls · recorded grading

# Market Our pick Our chance Recorded grade
1 Match result Pick: GAIS Chance: 48.5% Wrong
2 Total goals 2.5 Pick: Under 2.5 Chance: 58.7% Wrong6 goals
3 Total goals 1.5 Pick: Over 1.5 Chance: 68.4% Correct6 goals
4 Total goals 3.5 Pick: Under 3.5 Chance: 79.2% Wrong6 goals
5 Both teams to score Pick: No Chance: 54.0% Wrong

Our verdict

Road2Sushi's own call on this match: the likeliest result, how confident the model is, its strongest signals and the reasons behind them.

Every percentage is a model estimate and every fair price is 1 divided by that estimate. Neither is a bookmaker offer, and a model call is not a proven edge over the market.

Model pick

GAIS
Match winner (1X2)48.5%
Fair odds2.06
Save model pickSaved to my bets

Top signals

Goals marketUnder 3.5 goals
Model estimateModel79.2%
Fair oddsFair1.26
Double chance marketDraw or GAIS
Model estimateModel76.7%
Fair oddsFair1.30
Both teams to scoreNot both teams to score
Model estimateModel54.0%
Fair oddsFair1.85

Model read

This match has been played. This is a historical snapshot of the pre-match estimates, not a current price opportunity. GAIS lead the result estimates Read full analysisShow less

This match has been played. This is a historical snapshot of the pre-match estimates, not a current price opportunity. GAIS lead the result estimates at 48.5%. The match still has meaningful room for a draw or an opponent win. Under 2.5 goals stands out at 58.7%. The estimate leans this way, with substantial uncertainty remaining. Without a complete matching price comparison, this is an event read rather than a verified price opportunity. The overall match assessment has not cleared the model's betting filters; this market read does not override that decision.

Under 2.5 goals

Model estimate
58.7%
Fair odds
1.71

Not both teams to score

Model estimate
54.0%
Fair odds
1.85

Context & limits

  • Orgryte: 0 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • GAIS: 2 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • The last 1 recorded meetings averaged 4.0 goals. This is a historical sample, not a forecast for this fixture.
  • Recorded season averages: Orgryte 1.1 and GAIS 1.2 goals scored per game. These are team averages, not a forecast of this match total.
  • A complete matching price comparison is unavailable for this selection, so a price edge cannot be established.
Additional match context

Our engine prices GAIS at 48% for 18 October 2026. Favourites, yes; certainties, no. The numbers that frame it: • Worth knowing: bookmakers rate GAIS higher (60%) than our model does. • This shapes as a low scoring affair: Over 2.5 is only 41% with both teams to score at 46%. • Orgryte are newly promoted, a profile the model deliberately prices with caution. • The recent series reads 0 wins for Orgryte, 0 draws and 1 for GAIS over 1 games, 4.0 goals on average. Form guide over the last six: Orgryte W0 D2 L4, GAIS W2 D1 L3. Discipline says sit it out: too extreme an outsider (fair 0.22).

Form & head-to-head

Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.

Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.

OrgryteOrgryteLast 5
L
Loss · 0-1
D
Draw · 1-1
L
Loss · 1-4
L
Loss · 1-2
L
Loss · 0-3

0 wins · 1 draw · 4 losses

GAISGAISLast 5
W
Win · 4-0
D
Draw · 0-0
L
Loss · 0-2
W
Win · 3-0
L
Loss · 0-1

2 wins · 1 draw · 2 losses

W Win
D Draw
L Loss

Head-to-head

Last 1 meeting

0OrgryteOrgryte wins
0Draws
1GAISGAIS wins
4.0Average goals
Date
Home team
Score
Away team
GAISGAIS
4 – 0
OrgryteOrgryte

Odds: model vs bookmaker

Every price for this match in one place: the model's probabilities next to the bookmaker's, the bookmaker's prices with our gap, and the model's own fair odds for each market.

Bookmaker probabilities are de-vigged (the margin is removed) and come from one bookmaker. A gap between the model and that bookmaker is a disagreement, not a proven edge. Fair odds are 1 divided by the model probability, not a bookmaker quote.

Model vs market

Pre-match estimates, recorded before the match.

1X2: Bet365 prices, observed 18 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC, with the bookmaker margin taken out.

A market probability is the bookmaker's own price with its margin taken out, so the outcomes of each line add up to 100%. A gap from our model is a disagreement, not a proven edge: when we tested 1X2 and goal totals on matches the model had never seen, the bookmaker's closing price was more accurate. For corners, cards and shots we have no such test.

Every market price shown was recorded before kick-off.

1X2

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 23.3%
Orgryte

Model minus market: +5.9 pp
Market probability: 17.4%
Model probability: 28.2%
Draw

Model minus market: +5.9 pp
Market probability: 22.3%
Model probability: 48.5%
GAIS

Model minus market: -11.7 pp
Market probability: 60.2%

Goals

No recorded bookmaker price for this market.

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 89.7%
Over 0.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 10.3%
Under 0.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 68.4%
Over 1.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 31.6%
Under 1.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 41.3%
Over 2.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 58.7%
Under 2.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 20.8%
Over 3.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 79.2%
Under 3.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 8.8%
Over 4.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 91.2%
Under 4.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 3.2%
Over 5.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 96.8%
Under 5.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 46.0%
Both teams to score · Yes

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 54.0%
Both teams to score · No

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Cards

No estimates available for this market.

Corners

No estimates available for this market.

Shots

No estimates available for this market.

Bookmaker odds

Real bookmaker price (Bet365) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.

Gap is our probability minus the probability the bookmaker price implies (1 divided by the price), in percentage points. Because the price includes the margin, most gaps are negative. Model highlights are outcomes where our probability is at least 15 points higher. A gap is a disagreement, not a proven edge.

After full time these are the stored pre-match prices, kept for the record. They are not current prices, so no outcome is highlighted.

Match result · 1X2

Orgryte winBookmaker5.00Model fair4.29Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: +3.3 pp
DrawBookmaker4.00Model fair3.55Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: +3.2 pp
GAIS winBookmaker1.57Model fair2.06Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -15.1 pp

Model fair odds

Our published model probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote. Only the supported 1X2 calibration pool is calibrated; other markets retain their model estimates.

Match result

Orgryte win4.29
Draw3.55
GAIS win2.06
Both teams to score2.17

Goals

Over 0.5 goals1.11
Over 1.5 goals1.46
Over 2.5 goals2.42
Over 3.5 goals4.81
Orgryte most4.29
GAIS most2.06

Totals line guide

Both teams combined.

Over 0.589.7%Over 1.568.4%Over 2.541.3%Over 3.520.8%Over 4.58.8%Over 5.53.2%
Our stored model focusOver 1.568.4%

The stored model call was Fairly priced. The match has been played, so this is a historical snapshot: the graded result is below.

Read context

Both teams combined. Each bar uses the stored model estimate for that exact total-goals line. Missing estimates are unavailable; they are not zero.

Fair odds are the model’s own probability price, not a published bookmaker offer.

Market explorer

Model probabilities and fair odds.

Each bar is a specific Over selection for both teams combined. Its height is the model probability, on the same 0–100% scale.

Risk describes estimated likelihood, not profitability: low risk at least 62%, medium 48% to under 62%, high below 48%. Colors follow the actual estimate, even when a risk band is missing.

Up to four markets are selected from available model data, prioritising a spread of risk profiles. Fair odds are calculated from the model, not bookmaker prices: 1 divided by probability.

Scores are exact home-away outcomes from zero to five goals per team. Unavailable estimates stay blank; partial inputs are not expanded, inferred or normalised. Scores outside the matrix remain eligible for the top three.

Low riskMedium riskHigh risk

Goals

Over 0.50.5 goals, Low risk
Model probability 89.7%
Fair odds Fair 1.11
Over 1.51.5 goals, Low risk
Model probability 68.4%
Fair odds Fair 1.46
Over 2.52.5 goals, High risk
Model probability 41.3%
Fair odds Fair 2.42
Correct score probabilitiesModel probability / Fair odds
Goal axes Home goals
Away goals 0 1 2 3 4 5
Away goals 0 0-010.3%Fair odds 9.71 1-08.2%Fair odds 12.27 2-04.0%Fair odds 25.06 3-01.2%Fair odds 82.64 4-00.3%Fair odds 370.37 5-00.1%Fair odds 2,000.00
Away goals 1 0-113.2%Fair odds 7.58 1-113.2%Fair odds 7.59 2-15.7%Fair odds 17.57 3-11.7%Fair odds 58.14 4-10.4%Fair odds 256.41 5-10.1%Fair odds 1,428.57
Away goals 2 0-29.9%Fair odds 10.14 1-29.0%Fair odds 11.17 2-24.1%Fair odds 24.63 3-21.2%Fair odds 81.30 4-20.3%Fair odds 357.14 5-20.1%Fair odds 2,000.00
Away goals 3 0-34.7%Fair odds 21.28 1-34.3%Fair odds 23.47 2-31.9%Fair odds 51.81 3-30.6%Fair odds 169.49 4-30.1%Fair odds 769.23 5-30.0%Fair odds 5,000.00
Away goals 4 0-41.7%Fair odds 59.52 1-41.5%Fair odds 65.79 2-40.7%Fair odds 144.93 3-40.2%Fair odds 476.19 4-40.1%Fair odds 2,000.00 5-40.0%Fair odds 10,000.00
Away goals 5 0-50.5%Fair odds 208.33 1-50.4%Fair odds 232.56 2-50.2%Fair odds 500.00 3-50.1%Fair odds 1,666.67 4-50.0%Fair odds 10,000.00 5-50.0%Fair odds ·

Model’s 3 most likely score outcomes

Model probability · Fair odds

0-1
Model probability13.2%
Fair odds7.58
1-1
Model probability13.2%
Fair odds7.59
0-0
Model probability10.3%
Fair odds9.71

Referee

One match referee is shown from an explicitly saved result or a fresh, identity-matched provider fixture. Previous referees are never used to guess an appointment. An API listing can change.

The referee’s totals count every completed match with this referee in our data: football-data.co.uk names the referee in English leagues, and API-Football names the referee of the same match (same teams, date and score) in every league from 2025/26. A rate needs at least 5 matches with that figure.

The team table shows each team’s published history with that same referee only. Matches, team cards per game and match cards per game are separate fields; their available samples can differ. Missing values are not zero. Cards include yellow and red cards in the current historical source.

Recorded match referee.

Oscar Johnson in our data
Per match All matches 2026
Matches 37 17
Goals 2.70 2.88
Yellow cards 4.30 3.71
Corners 10.7 9.5
Fouls 26.2 26.5
Both teams scored 49% 59%
Over 2.5 goals 57% 53%
Home wins 35% 41%
Latest 10 matches
Date Match Score Goals BTTS Yellow Red Corners Fouls
18 Oct 2026 Orgryte vs GAIS 4-2 6 Yes 3 0 9 21
12 Oct 2026 Malmo FF vs Kalmar 1-0 1 No 4 0 10 47
20 Sep 2026 Djurgarden vs Elfsborg 1-2 3 Yes 1 Not available 11 15
7 Sep 2026 Malmo FF vs AIK 0-0 0 No 3 0 12 22
21 Aug 2026 Sirius vs Hacken 0-3 3 No 3 Not available 11 24
14 Aug 2026 Elfsborg vs Vasteras SK 3-0 3 No 4 Not available 6 29
2 Aug 2026 Brommapojkarna vs Malmo FF 1-2 3 Yes 7 Not available 8 32
26 Jul 2026 Sirius vs Goteborg 4-1 5 Yes 5 Not available 8 23
12 Jul 2026 Vasteras SK vs Degerfors 2-0 2 No 8 Not available 7 37
6 Jul 2026 Hacken vs Djurgarden 2-4 6 Yes 3 1 15 22

Oscar Johnson referee stats

Team history with this referee
Team
Orgryte Not available Not available Not available
GAIS Not available Not available Not available

No matching history for this referee is available for one or both teams.

Season stats

2026 season. Recorded results, not model estimates.

OrgryteOrgryte
GAISGAIS

Overview

Statistic
Orgryte
GAIS
League position
#15 of 16
#10 of 16
Matches played
23
23
Record W-D-L
3-6-14
8-6-9
Recent form
LDLLL
Last 5 matches
WDLWL
Last 5 matches
Current streak
L3
L1
Points per game
0.65
1.30
Record, home vs away
1-6-4
3-2-6
PPG, home vs away
0.82
1.00

PPG scale: 0–3 points per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Show all season statsHide season stats

Goals

Statistic
Orgryte
GAIS
Goals scored per game
1.09
1.22
Goals conceded per game
2.26
0.91
Scored, home vs away
1.55
1.09
Conceded, home vs away
1.82
1.45

Scale: 0–3 goals or expected goals (xG) per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Goal rates

Statistic
Orgryte
GAIS
Over 2.5 rate
56.5%
34.8%
BTTS rate
56.5%
30.4%
Clean sheets
13.0%
43.5%

Scale: 0–100% of recorded matches, not model estimates. Each team uses the same scale independently.

League averages this season: 2.94 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 53.3% · BTTS in 51.6%. Full league tables & stats →

First half / second half

Averages per game in this season’s league matches, split at half-time. Games is the number of each team’s matches with verified half data for that row; below five matches the row stays blank, and a missing value is never a zero.

Corners, shots on target and yellow cards per half come from the data provider’s half-by-half match statistics and are only used when the two halves add up to the full-time count. Cards are split by the minute they were shown, and first-half stoppage time counts as the first half. These are recorded results, not predictions.

This match

This match by half: Orgryte and GAIS
Orgryte GAIS
Statistic 1H 2H 1H 2H
Goals 1 3 1 1
OrgryteOrgryte

Not enough verified half data for this team yet.

GAISGAIS

Not enough verified half data for this team yet.

All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots

Shots on target

Cards

Clean sheet & win to nil

Worked out from the scoreline grid above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the other side fails to score. It is the model’s own percentage, scored against the result afterwards, and it is not a tip.

Orgryte clean sheet 24.0%
GAIS clean sheet 40.2%
Orgryte win to nil 13.7%
GAIS win to nil 29.9%

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

The model’s own percentages, with no odds attached. The smaller markets are here so you can see everything we hold a number on, not because we claim an advantage in them. The colour says how close our percentages have landed to reality on matches the model had never seen. This is the raw model spectrum. Its match-result marginal can differ from the published 1X2 above; it does not replace the saved prediction.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 23.3% draw 28.2% away 48.5%
double_chance
1X 51.5% 12 71.8% X2 76.7%
dnb
home 32.4% away 67.6%
btts
yes 46.0% no 54.0%
clean_sheet
home 24.0% away 40.3%
win_to_nil
home 13.7% away 30.0%
winning_margin
home_by_1 15.2% home_by_2 6.0% home_by_3plus 2.1%
away_by_1 24.3% away_by_2 14.9% away_by_3plus 9.4%
correct_score
0-0 10.3% 0-1 13.2% 0-2 9.9%
0-3 4.7% 0-4 1.7% 0-5 0.5%
1-0 8.2% 1-1 13.2% 1-2 9.0%
1-3 4.3% 1-4 1.5% 1-5 0.4%
2-0 4.0% 2-1 5.7% 2-2 4.1%
2-3 1.9% 2-4 0.7% 2-5 0.2%
3-0 1.2% 3-1 1.7% 3-2 1.2%
3-3 0.6% 3-4 0.2% 3-5 0.1%
4-0 0.3% 4-1 0.4% 4-2 0.3%
4-3 0.1% 4-4 0.1% 4-5 0.0%
5-0 0.1% 5-1 0.1% 5-2 0.1%
5-3 0.0% 5-4 0.0% 5-5 0.0%
other 0.4%
likeliest_score
h 0.0% a 100.0% p 13.2%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 89.7% under_0.5 10.3% over_1.5 68.4%
under_1.5 31.6% over_2.5 41.3% under_2.5 58.7%
over_3.5 20.8% under_3.5 79.2% over_4.5 8.8%
under_4.5 91.2% over_5.5 3.2% under_5.5 96.8%
odd_even
odd 48.3% even 51.7%
team_home
over_0.5 59.7% under_0.5 40.3% over_1.5 23.0%
under_1.5 77.0% over_2.5 6.4% under_2.5 93.6%
team_away
over_0.5 76.0% under_0.5 24.0% over_1.5 41.8%
under_1.5 58.2% over_2.5 17.3% under_2.5 82.7%
most
home 23.3% draw 28.2% away 48.5%
handicap
home_-2.5 2.1% away_+2.5 97.9% home_-1.5 8.1%
away_+1.5 91.9% home_-0.5 23.3% away_+0.5 76.7%
home_+0.5 51.5% away_-0.5 48.5% home_+1.5 75.8%
away_-1.5 24.2% home_+2.5 90.6% away_-2.5 9.4%
total_exact
exact_0 10.3% exact_1 21.3% exact_2 27.0%
exact_3 20.5% exact_4 12.0% exact_5 5.6%
exact_6 2.2% exact_7plus 1.0%
Method, limits & performance

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0106 (56038 matches).

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match