Bristol City vs Lincoln: model prediction
Judged against the prediction this page published before kickoff. Right or wrong, it stays on the record.
Bristol City or draw
Over 1.5 goals
Over 8.5 corners
Full time5 of 11 calls right
Our most likely call was Bristol City at 55.1%, and it was wrong. We called Over 2.5 at 51.7% and it missed (1 goals). We called Over 1.5 at 76.4% and it missed (1 goals). We called Under 3.5 at 70.5% and it landed (1 goals). We called Yes at 52.3% and it missed. We called Yes at 63.6% and it missed. We called Yes at 72.3% and it landed. We called Over 9.5 at 60.1% and it landed (17 corners). We called Under 3.5 at 51.7% and it missed (7 yellow cards). We called Over 24.5 at 53.1% and it landed (27 shots). We called Over 7.5 at 53.6% and it missed (7 shots on target). We called No at 89.4% and it landed.
| Match data | Bristol City | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Goals, 1st half | 0 | 0 |
| Goals, 2nd half | 0 | 1 |
| Shots | 18 | 9 |
| Shots on target | 4 | 3 |
| Corners | 13 | 4 |
| Yellow cards | 2 | 5 |
| Red cards | 0 | 0 |
| Fouls | 13 | 19 |
Final match data.
Win probability · fair 1.81
Top signals
Model read
"Bristol City or Lincoln? We publish probabilities, not certainties." On paper this is one way traffic: the calibrated model makes Bristol City heavy favourites at 55% when Bristol City meet Lincoln in the Championship on 15 September 2026. The market broadly agrees, pricing Bristol City at 53%. Totals sit close to the fence: 52% for Over 2.5 with both teams to score at 52%. Recent form reads W3 D1 L2 for Bristol City against W2 D2 L2 for Lincoln. As a promoted side, Lincoln carry exactly the structural uncertainty our priors were built for. Discipline says sit it out: value_gap +0.023 <= 0.03.
Value & higher-risk angles
Lower-probability calls our model rates above the obvious price; random finds are high-return scorelines that can happen. Higher risk, not a tip; we never beat the sharp market.
Model vs market
55.1%+2.3%
24.5%-0.8%
20.4%-1.5%
value_gap +0.023 <= 0.03
Goals
Corners
Shots
Recent shot volume
Shots taken and faced per game over each side’s last 6 matches, from real match data.
Totals line guide
Before kick-off our call was Fairly priced. The match has been played, so this is a historical snapshot: the graded result is below.
Form & head-to-head
Season stats
Season 2026/27, real results only
83.3%33.3%
83.3%50.0%
0.0%50.0%
League averages this season: 2.86 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 63% · BTTS in 67%. Full league tables & stats →
Bookmaker odds
Real bookmaker price (Bet365) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.
Model fair odds
Our calibrated probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote.
Match result
Goals
Corners
Cards
Shots on target
Shots
Fouls
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets
Shots
| Over 22.5 | 65.5% | Over 24.5 | 53.1% | Over 26.5 | 40.9% | Over 28.5 | 29.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most: Bristol City | 58.4% | Most: Lincoln | 35.5% | ||||
| Bristol City Over 13.2 | 48.1% | Lincoln Over 13.2 | 31.9% |
Shots on target
| Over 6.5 | 66.6% | Over 7.5 | 53.6% | Over 8.5 | 40.8% | Over 9.5 | 29.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most: Bristol City | 52.3% | Most: Lincoln | 34.7% | ||||
| Bristol City Over 4.2 | 43.3% | Lincoln Over 4.2 | 30.9% |
Cards
| Over 2.5 | 69.6% | Over 3.5 | 48.3% | Over 4.5 | 29.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most: Bristol City | 26.0% | Most: Lincoln | 53.2% | ||
| Bristol City Over 1.8 | 42.8% | Lincoln Over 1.8 | 63.0% |
Clean sheet & win to nil
Derived from the model score matrix above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the opponent is on zero. Calibration-graded, not a tip.
| Bristol City clean sheet | 37.1% |
|---|---|
| Lincoln clean sheet | 17.2% |
| Bristol City win to nil | 30.1% |
| Lincoln win to nil | 10.2% |
Full market spectrum · model probabilities
Calibration-graded model %, no odds attached. Niche markets are transparency/coverage, not a claimed edge. Colour = measured out-of-sample calibration.
Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
| home | 55.1% | draw | 24.5% | away | 20.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
double_chance
| 1X | 79.6% | 12 | 75.5% | X2 | 44.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dnb
| home | 73.0% | away | 27.0% |
|---|
btts
| yes | 52.3% | no | 47.7% |
|---|
clean_sheet
| home | 37.5% | away | 17.2% |
|---|
win_to_nil
| home | 30.5% | away | 10.2% |
|---|
winning_margin
| home_by_1 | 23.8% | home_by_2 | 17.1% | home_by_3plus | 14.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_by_1 | 13.1% | away_by_2 | 5.3% | away_by_3plus | 2.0% |
correct_score
| 0-0 | 7.0% | 0-1 | 5.8% | 0-2 | 3.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-3 | 1.0% | 0-4 | 0.3% | 0-5 | 0.1% |
| 1-0 | 10.8% | 1-1 | 11.7% | 1-2 | 5.5% |
| 1-3 | 1.8% | 1-4 | 0.4% | 1-5 | 0.1% |
| 2-0 | 10.0% | 2-1 | 9.8% | 2-2 | 4.8% |
| 2-3 | 1.6% | 2-4 | 0.4% | 2-5 | 0.1% |
| 3-0 | 5.9% | 3-1 | 5.8% | 3-2 | 2.8% |
| 3-3 | 0.9% | 3-4 | 0.2% | 3-5 | 0.0% |
| 4-0 | 2.6% | 4-1 | 2.5% | 4-2 | 1.2% |
| 4-3 | 0.4% | 4-4 | 0.1% | 4-5 | 0.0% |
| 5-0 | 0.9% | 5-1 | 0.9% | 5-2 | 0.4% |
| 5-3 | 0.1% | 5-4 | 0.0% | 5-5 | 0.0% |
| other | 1.0% |
likeliest_score
| h | 100.0% | a | 100.0% | p | 11.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
| over_0.5 | 93.0% | under_0.5 | 7.0% | over_1.5 | 76.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 23.6% | over_2.5 | 51.7% | under_2.5 | 48.3% |
| over_3.5 | 29.5% | under_3.5 | 70.5% | over_4.5 | 14.3% |
| under_4.5 | 85.7% | over_5.5 | 6.0% | under_5.5 | 94.0% |
odd_even
| odd | 48.7% | even | 51.3% |
|---|
team_home
| over_0.5 | 82.8% | under_0.5 | 17.2% | over_1.5 | 52.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 47.5% | over_2.5 | 25.9% | under_2.5 | 74.1% |
team_away
| over_0.5 | 62.6% | under_0.5 | 37.5% | over_1.5 | 25.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 74.2% | over_2.5 | 7.7% | under_2.5 | 92.3% |
most
| home | 55.1% | draw | 24.5% | away | 20.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-2.5 | 14.1% | away_+2.5 | 85.9% | home_-1.5 | 31.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+1.5 | 68.8% | home_-0.5 | 55.1% | away_+0.5 | 44.9% |
| home_+0.5 | 79.6% | away_-0.5 | 20.4% | home_+1.5 | 92.7% |
| away_-1.5 | 7.3% | home_+2.5 | 98.0% | away_-2.5 | 2.0% |
total_exact
| exact_0 | 7.0% | exact_1 | 16.6% | exact_2 | 24.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exact_3 | 22.1% | exact_4 | 15.2% | exact_5 | 8.3% |
| exact_6 | 3.8% | exact_7plus | 2.2% |
First half range, not a point
1×2
| home | 32.3% | draw | 46.0% | away | 21.6% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
total
| over_0.5 | 63.6% | under_0.5 | 36.4% | over_1.5 | 26.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 73.2% | over_2.5 | 8.2% | under_2.5 | 91.8% |
btts
| yes | 15.4% | no | 84.6% |
|---|
total_exact
| exact_0 | 36.4% | exact_1 | 36.8% | exact_2 | 18.6% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exact_3 | 6.3% | exact_4plus | 2.0% |
Second half range, not a point
1×2
| home | 32.8% | draw | 40.3% | away | 26.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
total
| over_0.5 | 72.3% | under_0.5 | 27.7% | over_1.5 | 36.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 63.3% | over_2.5 | 13.9% | under_2.5 | 86.1% |
btts
| yes | 22.3% | no | 77.7% |
|---|
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
| H/H | 25.4% | H/D | 5.2% | H/A | 1.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D/H | 15.1% | D/D | 18.5% | D/A | 12.4% |
| A/H | 1.7% | A/D | 4.4% | A/A | 15.5% |
Corners range, not a point
total
| over_7.5 | 81.0% | under_7.5 | 19.0% | over_8.5 | 71.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_8.5 | 28.8% | over_9.5 | 60.1% | under_9.5 | 39.9% |
| over_10.5 | 48.4% | under_10.5 | 51.6% | over_11.5 | 37.4% |
| under_11.5 | 62.6% | over_12.5 | 27.5% | under_12.5 | 72.5% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_3.5 | 80.0% | under_3.5 | 20.1% | over_4.5 | 66.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 33.6% | over_5.5 | 51.6% | under_5.5 | 48.4% |
team_away
| over_3.5 | 66.1% | under_3.5 | 33.9% | over_4.5 | 49.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 50.7% | over_5.5 | 33.9% | under_5.5 | 66.1% |
most
| home | 56.6% | draw | 10.1% | away | 33.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-3.5 | 26.7% | away_+3.5 | 73.3% | home_-1.5 | 46.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+1.5 | 53.9% | home_-0.5 | 56.6% | away_+0.5 | 43.4% |
| home_+0.5 | 66.7% | away_-0.5 | 33.3% | home_+1.5 | 75.7% |
| away_-1.5 | 24.3% | home_+3.5 | 88.9% | away_-3.5 | 11.1% |
Shots range, not a point
total
| over_22.5 | 65.5% | under_22.5 | 34.5% | over_24.5 | 53.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_24.5 | 46.9% | over_26.5 | 40.9% | under_26.5 | 59.1% |
| over_28.5 | 29.7% | under_28.5 | 70.3% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_10.5 | 72.9% | under_10.5 | 27.1% | over_12.5 | 56.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_12.5 | 43.5% | over_14.5 | 40.0% | under_14.5 | 60.0% |
team_away
| over_10.5 | 58.2% | under_10.5 | 41.8% | over_12.5 | 40.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_12.5 | 60.0% | over_14.5 | 24.8% | under_14.5 | 75.2% |
most
| home | 58.4% | draw | 6.1% | away | 35.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-4.5 | 33.7% | away_+4.5 | 66.3% | home_-2.5 | 45.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+2.5 | 54.2% | home_-0.5 | 58.4% | away_+0.5 | 41.6% |
| home_+0.5 | 64.5% | away_-0.5 | 35.5% | home_+2.5 | 75.4% |
| away_-2.5 | 24.6% | home_+4.5 | 84.2% | away_-4.5 | 15.8% |
Shots on target range, not a point
total
| over_6.5 | 66.6% | under_6.5 | 33.4% | over_7.5 | 53.6% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_7.5 | 46.4% | over_8.5 | 40.8% | under_8.5 | 59.2% |
| over_9.5 | 29.5% | under_9.5 | 70.5% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_3.5 | 61.0% | under_3.5 | 39.1% | over_4.5 | 43.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 56.7% | over_5.5 | 28.2% | under_5.5 | 71.8% |
team_away
| over_3.5 | 48.5% | under_3.5 | 51.5% | over_4.5 | 30.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 69.1% | over_5.5 | 17.8% | under_5.5 | 82.2% |
most
| home | 52.3% | draw | 13.0% | away | 34.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-2.5 | 27.2% | away_+2.5 | 72.8% | home_-0.5 | 52.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+0.5 | 47.7% | home_+0.5 | 65.3% | away_-0.5 | 34.7% |
| home_+2.5 | 85.6% | away_-2.5 | 14.4% |
Cards calibrated
total
| over_2.5 | 69.6% | under_2.5 | 30.4% | over_3.5 | 48.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_3.5 | 51.7% | over_4.5 | 29.2% | under_4.5 | 70.8% |
| over_5.5 | 15.5% | under_5.5 | 84.5% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_1.5 | 42.8% | under_1.5 | 57.3% | over_2.5 | 18.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_2.5 | 82.0% |
team_away
| over_1.5 | 63.0% | under_1.5 | 37.0% | over_2.5 | 36.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_2.5 | 64.0% |
most
| home | 26.1% | draw | 20.8% | away | 53.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-1.5 | 11.6% | away_+1.5 | 88.4% | home_-0.5 | 26.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+0.5 | 74.0% | home_+0.5 | 46.8% | away_-0.5 | 53.2% |
| home_+1.5 | 68.1% | away_-1.5 | 32.0% |
Fouls calibrated
total
| over_20.5 | 59.0% | under_20.5 | 41.0% | over_22.5 | 43.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_22.5 | 56.8% | over_24.5 | 28.9% | under_24.5 | 71.1% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_9.5 | 52.5% | under_9.5 | 47.5% | over_11.5 | 30.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_11.5 | 69.7% | over_13.5 | 14.5% | under_13.5 | 85.5% |
team_away
| over_9.5 | 73.0% | under_9.5 | 27.0% | over_11.5 | 52.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_11.5 | 47.8% | over_13.5 | 32.0% | under_13.5 | 68.0% |
most
| home | 30.9% | draw | 7.4% | away | 61.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-3.5 | 13.6% | away_+3.5 | 86.4% | home_-0.5 | 30.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+0.5 | 69.1% | home_+2.5 | 54.2% | away_-2.5 | 45.8% |
Red card range, not a point
any
| yes | 10.6% | no | 89.4% |
|---|
home
| yes | 8.6% | no | 91.4% |
|---|
away
| yes | 2.2% | no | 97.8% |
|---|
How this works (honestly)
We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.
Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.
Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.
We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.
Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0095 (55416 matches).
More: Bristol City predictions · Lincoln predictions · Championship
Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.
Explore this match
Markets

