Celta B 1-1 Tenerife: result, our prediction

Segunda División
Celta BCelta BLLDLW
Full time1-1Mon, 19 Oct 202619/1019:30UK
TenerifeTenerifeWLDLD
43.8%Home winFair odds 2.28
27.7%DrawFair odds 3.61
28.5%Away winFair odds 3.51
Pre-match: Most likely published score1-113.2%Fair odds 7.59

Pre-match model estimates · MODELS TOP 3

Based on the Road2Sushi model. Not guaranteed outcomes.

Under 3.5 goalsBoth teams combined75.2%
Over 1.5 goalsBoth teams combined72.5%
Celta B or draw71.5%

Post-match analysis

Judged against the prediction this page published before kickoff. Right or wrong, it stays on the record.

A call is the side our published probability favoured. If we leaned towards under and three goals went in, that counts as a miss.

The half-by-half shots come from a different source than the match shot total, and we only use them when the shots before the break add up to the actual half-time score. That is why the two numbers can differ slightly.

Celta BCelta B
1-1FT
TenerifeTenerife

Match data

Match data: Celta B and Tenerife
Celta BCelta B Statistic TenerifeTenerife
1 Goals 1
1 Goals, 1st half 0
0 Goals, 2nd half 1
14 Shots 10
11 Shots, 1st half 4
3 Shots, 2nd half 6
4 Shots on target 3
4 On target, 1st half 2
0 On target, 2nd half 1
4 Corners 4
3 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
20 Fouls 12

RefereeGonzalo Romero Freixas

The result, on the record

Recorded tally 9 of 12 published calls on this match were right.

Published calls · recorded grading

# Market Our pick Our chance Recorded grade
1 Match result Pick: Celta B Chance: 43.8% Wrong
2 Total goals 2.5 Pick: Under 2.5 Chance: 53.7% Correct2 goals
3 Total goals 1.5 Pick: Over 1.5 Chance: 72.5% Correct2 goals
4 Total goals 3.5 Pick: Under 3.5 Chance: 75.2% Correct2 goals
5 Both teams to score Pick: Yes Chance: 51.3% Correct
6 First-half goal Pick: Yes Chance: 79.8% Correct
# Market Our pick Our chance Recorded grade
7 Second-half goal Pick: Yes Chance: 73.1% Correct
8 Total corners 9.5 Pick: Under 9.5 Chance: 56.8% Correct8 corners
9 Yellow cards 3.5 Pick: Over 3.5 Chance: 75.7% Correct5 yellow cards
10 Total shots 24.5 Pick: Over 24.5 Chance: 50.6% Wrong24 shots
11 Shots on target 7.5 Pick: Over 7.5 Chance: 61.2% Wrong7 shots on target
12 Red card Pick: No Chance: 82.3% Correct

Our verdict

Road2Sushi's own call on this match: the likeliest result, how confident the model is, its strongest signals and the reasons behind them.

Every percentage is a model estimate and every fair price is 1 divided by that estimate. Neither is a bookmaker offer, and a model call is not a proven edge over the market.

Model pick

Celta B
Match winner (1X2)43.8%
Fair odds2.28
Save model pickSaved to my bets

Top signals

Goals marketUnder 3.5 goals
Model estimateModel75.2%
Fair oddsFair1.33
Double chance marketCelta B or draw
Model estimateModel71.5%
Fair oddsFair1.40
Corners marketOver 7.5 corners
Model estimateModel68.0%
Fair oddsFair1.47

Model read

This match has been played. This is a historical snapshot of the pre-match estimates, not a current price opportunity. An open result market: Celta B Read full analysisShow less

This match has been played. This is a historical snapshot of the pre-match estimates, not a current price opportunity. An open result market: Celta B lead at 43.8%, with draw 27.7% and Tenerife at 28.5%. No result has a majority of the model probability. Over 3.5 cards · both teams stands out at 75.7%. It is a stronger probability signal than the other eligible reads shown here. Without a complete matching price comparison, this is an event read rather than a verified price opportunity. The overall match assessment has not cleared the model's betting filters; this market read does not override that decision.

Over 3.5 cards · both teams

Model estimate
75.7%
Fair odds
1.32

Over 7.5 shots on target · both teams

Model estimate
61.2%
Fair odds
1.63

Under 9.5 corners · both teams

Model estimate
56.8%
Fair odds
1.76

Context & limits

  • Celta B: 1 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • Tenerife: 1 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses in the last 5 recorded matches. Recent form is context, not an extra win probability.
  • Recorded season averages: Celta B 2.8 and Tenerife 2.4 cards per game. These are team averages, not a forecast of this match total.
  • Some displayed estimates have limited validation. Read those percentages as a range, not a precise prediction.
  • A complete matching price comparison is unavailable for this selection, so a price edge cannot be established.
Additional match context

"Celta B or Tenerife? We publish probabilities, not certainties." Celta B versus Tenerife on 19 October 2026 tilts towards Celta B in our numbers (44%), with plenty left over for the other outcomes. Notably, the model is warmer on Celta B than the market (36%). We flag disagreement rather than hide it. Totals sit close to the fence: 46% for Over 2.5 with both teams to score at 51%. As a promoted side, Celta B carry exactly the structural uncertainty our priors were built for. Recent form reads W2 D1 L3 for Celta B against W1 D3 L2 for Tenerife. Discipline says sit it out: outside trust zone (model prob 0.44, zone (0.45, 0.7)).

Form & head-to-head

Recent form uses each club’s available results in their stored order. Select a W/D/L result for details.

Head-to-head figures use their own recorded sample. Where individual results are available, the figures and journal cover the same meetings. Missing results are never counted as draws.

Celta BCelta BLast 5
L
Loss · 0-4
L
Loss · 0-2
D
Draw · 1-1
L
Loss · 2-3
W
Win · 4-1

1 win · 1 draw · 3 losses

TenerifeTenerifeLast 5
W
Win · 2-0
L
Loss · 0-5
D
Draw · 1-1
L
Loss · 2-3
D
Draw · 1-1

1 win · 2 draws · 2 losses

W Win
D Draw
L Loss

Head-to-head

No recorded head-to-head results available.

Odds: model vs bookmaker

Every price for this match in one place: the model's probabilities next to the bookmaker's, the bookmaker's prices with our gap, and the model's own fair odds for each market.

Bookmaker probabilities are de-vigged (the margin is removed) and come from one bookmaker. A gap between the model and that bookmaker is a disagreement, not a proven edge. Fair odds are 1 divided by the model probability, not a bookmaker quote.

Model vs market

Pre-match estimates, recorded before the match.

1X2: Bet365 prices, observed 18 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC, with the bookmaker margin taken out.

Goals: Bet365 prices via football-data.co.uk, observed 18 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC, with the bookmaker margin taken out.

A market probability is the bookmaker's own price with its margin taken out, so the outcomes of each line add up to 100%. A gap from our model is a disagreement, not a proven edge: when we tested 1X2 and goal totals on matches the model had never seen, the bookmaker's closing price was more accurate. For corners, cards and shots we have no such test.

Every market price shown was recorded before kick-off.

1X2

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 43.8%
Celta B

Model minus market: +7.7 pp
Market probability: 36.1%
Model probability: 27.7%
Draw

Model minus market: -1.9 pp
Market probability: 29.6%
Model probability: 28.5%
Tenerife

Model minus market: -5.8 pp
Market probability: 34.3%

Goals

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 91.4%
Over 0.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 8.6%
Under 0.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 72.5%
Over 1.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 27.5%
Under 1.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 46.3%
Over 2.5 goals

Model minus market: +0.5 pp
Market probability: 45.8%
Model probability: 53.7%
Under 2.5 goals

Model minus market: -0.5 pp
Market probability: 54.2%
Model probability: 24.8%
Over 3.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 75.2%
Under 3.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 11.3%
Over 4.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 88.8%
Under 4.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 4.4%
Over 5.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 95.6%
Under 5.5 goals

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 51.3%
Both teams to score · Yes

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 48.7%
Both teams to score · No

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Cards

No recorded bookmaker price for this market.

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 88.8%
Over 2.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 11.2%
Under 2.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 75.7%
Over 3.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 24.3%
Under 3.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 58.8%
Over 4.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 41.2%
Under 4.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 41.3%
Over 5.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 58.7%
Under 5.5 yellow cards

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Corners

No recorded bookmaker price for this market.

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 68.0%
Over 7.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 32.0%
Under 7.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 55.6%
Over 8.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 44.4%
Under 8.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 43.2%
Over 9.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 56.8%
Under 9.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 31.8%
Over 10.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 68.2%
Under 10.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 22.2%
Over 11.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 77.8%
Under 11.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 14.8%
Over 12.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 85.2%
Under 12.5 corners

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Shots

No recorded bookmaker price for this market.

ModelProbability (%)
Outcome
MarketProbability (%)
Model probability: 63.4%
Over 22.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 36.6%
Under 22.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 50.6%
Over 24.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 49.4%
Under 24.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 38.2%
Over 26.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 61.8%
Under 26.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 27.1%
Over 28.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 73.0%
Under 28.5 shots

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 73.7%
Over 6.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 26.3%
Under 6.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 61.2%
Over 7.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 38.8%
Under 7.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 48.0%
Over 8.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 52.0%
Under 8.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 35.6%
Over 9.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —
Model probability: 64.4%
Under 9.5 shots on target

Model minus market: —
Market probability: —

Bookmaker odds

Real bookmaker price (Bet365) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.

Gap is our probability minus the probability the bookmaker price implies (1 divided by the price), in percentage points. Because the price includes the margin, most gaps are negative. Model highlights are outcomes where our probability is at least 15 points higher. A gap is a disagreement, not a proven edge.

After full time these are the stored pre-match prices, kept for the record. They are not current prices, so no outcome is highlighted.

Match result · 1X2

Celta B winBookmaker2.57Model fair2.28Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: +4.8 pp
DrawBookmaker3.10Model fair3.61Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -4.5 pp
Tenerife winBookmaker2.70Model fair3.51Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -8.5 pp

Goals · 2.5

Over 2.5 goalsBookmaker2.05Model fair2.16Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -2.4 pp
Under 2.5 goalsBookmaker1.75Model fair1.86Model minus bookmaker probability, percentage points: -3.4 pp

Model fair odds

Our published model probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote. Only the supported 1X2 calibration pool is calibrated; other markets retain their model estimates.

Match result

Celta B win2.28
Draw3.61
Tenerife win3.51
Both teams to score1.95

Goals

Over 0.5 goals1.09
Over 1.5 goals1.38
Over 2.5 goals2.16
Over 3.5 goals4.03
Celta B most2.28
Tenerife most3.51

Corners

Over 7.5 corners1.47
Over 8.5 corners1.80
Over 9.5 corners2.32
Over 10.5 corners3.15
Celta B most1.98
Tenerife most2.61

Cards

Over 2.5 cards1.13
Over 3.5 cards1.32
Over 4.5 cards1.70
Over 5.5 cards2.42
Celta B most2.99
Tenerife most2.05

Shots on target

Over 6.5 SoT1.36
Over 7.5 SoT1.63
Over 8.5 SoT2.08
Over 9.5 SoT2.81
Celta B most1.72
Tenerife most3.41

Shots

Over 22.5 shots1.58
Over 24.5 shots1.97
Over 26.5 shots2.62
Over 28.5 shots3.70
Celta B most1.61
Tenerife most3.15

Fouls

Over 20.5 fouls1.16
Over 22.5 fouls1.31
Over 24.5 fouls1.55

Corners

Both teams combined.

Over 7.5 corners68.0%1.47Likely
Over 8.5 corners55.6%1.80Close call
Over 9.5 corners43.2%2.32Unlikely
Over 10.5 corners31.8%3.15Unlikely
Over 11.5 corners22.2%4.50Long shot
Over 12.5 corners14.8%6.77Long shot
Read context

Both teams combined

Over 7.5 corners · Likely

Over 8.5 corners · Close call

Over 9.5 corners · Unlikely

Over 10.5 corners · Unlikely

Over 11.5 corners · Long shot

Over 12.5 corners · Long shot

Most corners

Each team has its own model probability; these outcomes are not renormalised.

Celta B

Model probability

50.4%Fair odds 1.98

Tenerife

Model probability

38.3%Fair odds 2.61

Read context

Each team has its own model probability; these outcomes are not renormalised.

Celta B

Tenerife

Shots

Both teams combined.

Over 22.5 shots63.4%1.58Likely
Over 24.5 shots50.6%1.97Close call
Over 26.5 shots38.2%2.62Unlikely
Over 28.5 shots27.1%3.70Long shot
Over 6.5 on target73.7%1.36Likely
Over 7.5 on target61.2%1.63Likely
Over 8.5 on target48.0%2.08Close call
Over 9.5 on target35.6%2.81Unlikely
Read context

Both teams combined

Over 22.5 shots · Likely

Over 24.5 shots · Close call

Over 26.5 shots · Unlikely

Over 28.5 shots · Long shot

Over 6.5 on target · Likely

Over 7.5 on target · Likely

Over 8.5 on target · Close call

Over 9.5 on target · Unlikely

Recorded shots per game

Shots per game over each side's most recent league matches with shot data, and over the most recent matches at the venue of this match: Celta B at home and Tenerife away. These are recorded results, not predictions, and a missing value is never shown as zero.

Recorded shots per game over recent league matches
Last 6 matches Shots Faced On target
Celta B 13.7 15.3 ·
Tenerife 10.0 11.2 ·

Every shots line, home and away, by half

Totals line guide

Both teams combined.

Over 0.591.4%Over 1.572.5%Over 2.546.3%Over 3.524.8%Over 4.511.3%Over 5.54.4%
Our stored model focusOver 1.572.5%

The stored model call was Fairly priced. The match has been played, so this is a historical snapshot: the graded result is below.

Read context

Both teams combined. Each bar uses the stored model estimate for that exact total-goals line. Missing estimates are unavailable; they are not zero.

Fair odds are the model’s own probability price, not a published bookmaker offer.

Market explorer

Model probabilities and fair odds.

Each bar is a specific Over selection for both teams combined. Its height is the model probability, on the same 0–100% scale.

Risk describes estimated likelihood, not profitability: low risk at least 62%, medium 48% to under 62%, high below 48%. Colors follow the actual estimate, even when a risk band is missing.

Up to four markets are selected from available model data, prioritising a spread of risk profiles. Fair odds are calculated from the model, not bookmaker prices: 1 divided by probability.

Scores are exact home-away outcomes from zero to five goals per team. Unavailable estimates stay blank; partial inputs are not expanded, inferred or normalised. Scores outside the matrix remain eligible for the top three.

Low riskMedium riskHigh risk

Corners

Over 7.57.5 corners, Low risk
Model probability 68.0%
Fair odds Fair 1.47
Over 8.58.5 corners, Medium risk
Model probability 55.6%
Fair odds Fair 1.80
Over 10.510.5 corners, High risk
Model probability 31.8%
Fair odds Fair 3.15

Cards

Over 3.53.5 cards, Low risk
Model probability 75.7%
Fair odds Fair 1.32
Over 4.54.5 cards, Medium risk
Model probability 58.8%
Fair odds Fair 1.70
Over 5.55.5 cards, High risk
Model probability 41.3%
Fair odds Fair 2.42

Shots on target

Over 6.56.5 shots on target, Low risk
Model probability 73.7%
Fair odds Fair 1.36
Over 7.57.5 shots on target, Medium risk
Model probability 61.2%
Fair odds Fair 1.63
Over 9.59.5 shots on target, High risk
Model probability 35.6%
Fair odds Fair 2.81

Shots

Over 22.522.5 shots, Low risk
Model probability 63.4%
Fair odds Fair 1.58
Over 24.524.5 shots, Medium risk
Model probability 50.6%
Fair odds Fair 1.97
Over 26.526.5 shots, High risk
Model probability 38.2%
Fair odds Fair 2.62
Correct score probabilitiesModel probability / Fair odds
Goal axes Home goals
Away goals 0 1 2 3 4 5
Away goals 0 0-08.6%Fair odds 11.61 1-010.8%Fair odds 9.29 2-08.1%Fair odds 12.32 3-03.9%Fair odds 25.91 4-01.4%Fair odds 72.46 5-00.4%Fair odds 256.41
Away goals 1 0-18.2%Fair odds 12.24 1-113.2%Fair odds 7.59 2-18.9%Fair odds 11.19 3-14.3%Fair odds 23.53 4-11.5%Fair odds 65.79 5-10.4%Fair odds 232.56
Away goals 2 0-24.8%Fair odds 20.66 1-26.9%Fair odds 14.47 2-24.9%Fair odds 20.33 3-22.3%Fair odds 42.74 4-20.8%Fair odds 120.48 5-20.2%Fair odds 416.67
Away goals 3 0-31.8%Fair odds 56.18 1-32.5%Fair odds 39.37 2-31.8%Fair odds 55.25 3-30.9%Fair odds 116.28 4-30.3%Fair odds 322.58 5-30.1%Fair odds 1,111.11
Away goals 4 0-40.5%Fair odds 204.08 1-40.7%Fair odds 142.86 2-40.5%Fair odds 200.00 3-40.2%Fair odds 416.67 4-40.1%Fair odds 1,250.00 5-40.0%Fair odds 5,000.00
Away goals 5 0-50.1%Fair odds 909.09 1-50.2%Fair odds 666.67 2-50.1%Fair odds 909.09 3-50.1%Fair odds 2,000.00 4-50.0%Fair odds 5,000.00 5-50.0%Fair odds 10,000.00

Model’s 3 most likely score outcomes

Model probability · Fair odds

1-1
Model probability13.2%
Fair odds7.59
1-0
Model probability10.8%
Fair odds9.29
2-1
Model probability8.9%
Fair odds11.19

Referee

One match referee is shown from an explicitly saved result or a fresh, identity-matched provider fixture. Previous referees are never used to guess an appointment. An API listing can change.

The referee’s totals count every completed match with this referee in our data: football-data.co.uk names the referee in English leagues, and API-Football names the referee of the same match (same teams, date and score) in every league from 2025/26. A rate needs at least 5 matches with that figure.

The team table shows each team’s published history with that same referee only. Matches, team cards per game and match cards per game are separate fields; their available samples can differ. Missing values are not zero. Cards include yellow and red cards in the current historical source.

Gonzalo Romero Freixas

Recorded match referee.

No completed matches with this referee in our data yet.

Team history with this referee
Team
Celta B Not available Not available Not available
Tenerife Not available Not available Not available

No matching history for this referee is available for one or both teams.

Season stats

2026/27 season. Recorded results, not model estimates.

Celta BCelta B
TenerifeTenerife

Overview

Statistic
Celta B
Tenerife
League position
#13 of 22
#12 of 22
Matches played
9
9
Record W-D-L
3-2-4
3-3-3
Recent form
LLDLW
Last 5 matches
WLDLD
Last 5 matches
Current streak
W1
D1
Points per game
1.22
1.33
Record, home vs away
2-1-2
1-1-2
PPG, home vs away
1.40
1.00

PPG scale: 0–3 points per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Show all season statsHide season stats

Goals

Statistic
Celta B
Tenerife
Goals scored per game
1.56
1.22
Goals conceded per game
1.67
1.44
Scored, home vs away
2.00
1.50
Conceded, home vs away
2.00
2.50
1st half goals per game
0.67
0.78
2nd half goals per game
0.89
0.44

Scale: 0–3 goals or expected goals (xG) per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Shooting

Statistic
Celta B
Tenerife
Shots per game
12.1
10.3
Shots faced per game
15.4
10.8
Shots on target per game
5.2
3.0

Scale: 0–20 shots per game. Each team uses the same scale independently.

Corners & discipline

Statistic
Celta B
Tenerife
Corners won per game
3.7
4.2
Cards per game
2.8
2.4
Fouls per game
12.3
13.8
Red cards this season
1
1

0–10 corners per game; 0–5 cards per game; 0–20 fouls per game Each team uses the same scale independently.

Goal rates

Statistic
Celta B
Tenerife
Over 2.5 rate
55.6%
33.3%
BTTS rate
55.6%
55.6%
Clean sheets
22.2%
22.2%

Scale: 0–100% of recorded matches, not model estimates. Each team uses the same scale independently.

League averages this season: 2.65 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 49.5% · BTTS in 49.5%. Full league tables & stats →

First half / second half

Averages per game in this season’s league matches, split at half-time. Games is the number of each team’s matches with verified half data for that row; below five matches the row stays blank, and a missing value is never a zero.

Corners, shots on target and yellow cards per half come from the data provider’s half-by-half match statistics and are only used when the two halves add up to the full-time count. Cards are split by the minute they were shown, and first-half stoppage time counts as the first half. These are recorded results, not predictions.

In the Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, Serie A and Ligue 1 the shots per half come from a different source than the match shot totals, so the two can differ slightly.

This match

This match by half: Celta B and Tenerife
Celta B Tenerife
Statistic 1H 2H 1H 2H
Goals 1 0 0 1
Shots 11 3 4 6
Shots on target 4 0 2 1
Corners 4 0 2 2
Yellow cards 1 2 1 1
Celta BCelta B
Celta B: season average per game by half
Per game 1H 2H Games
Goals scoredScored 0.67 0.89 9
TenerifeTenerife
Tenerife: season average per game by half
Per game 1H 2H Games
Goals scoredScored 0.78 0.44 9
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots

Over 22.5 63.4% Over 24.5 50.6% Over 26.5 38.2% Over 28.5 27.1%
Most: Celta B 62.2% Most: Tenerife 31.8%
Celta B Over 10.5 74.0%
Celta B Over 12.5 57.4%
Celta B Over 14.5 40.6% Tenerife Over 10.5 53.9%
Tenerife Over 12.5 35.4%
Tenerife Over 14.5 20.7%

Shots on target

Over 6.5 73.7% Over 7.5 61.2% Over 8.5 48.0% Over 9.5 35.6%
Most: Celta B 58.1% Most: Tenerife 29.3%
Celta B Over 3.5 69.9%
Celta B Over 4.5 52.4%
Celta B Over 5.5 35.8% Tenerife Over 3.5 50.1%
Tenerife Over 4.5 31.5%
Tenerife Over 5.5 17.7%

Cards

Over 2.5 88.8% Over 3.5 75.7% Over 4.5 58.8% Over 5.5 41.3%
Most: Celta B 33.4% Most: Tenerife 48.9%
Celta B Over 1.5 68.2%
Celta B Over 2.5 41.8% Tenerife Over 1.5 77.0%
Tenerife Over 2.5 53.3%

Clean sheet & win to nil

Worked out from the scoreline grid above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the other side fails to score. It is the model’s own percentage, scored against the result afterwards, and it is not a tip.

Celta B clean sheet 33.1%
Tenerife clean sheet 24.0%
Celta B win to nil 24.5%
Tenerife win to nil 15.4%

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

The model’s own percentages, with no odds attached. The smaller markets are here so you can see everything we hold a number on, not because we claim an advantage in them. The colour says how close our percentages have landed to reality on matches the model had never seen. This is the raw model spectrum. Its match-result marginal can differ from the published 1X2 above; it does not replace the saved prediction.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 43.8% draw 27.7% away 28.5%
double_chance
1X 71.5% 12 72.3% X2 56.2%
dnb
home 60.6% away 39.4%
btts
yes 51.3% no 48.7%
clean_sheet
home 33.3% away 24.0%
win_to_nil
home 24.6% away 15.4%
winning_margin
home_by_1 22.4% home_by_2 13.3% home_by_3plus 8.2%
away_by_1 17.1% away_by_2 7.9% away_by_3plus 3.4%
correct_score
0-0 8.6% 0-1 8.2% 0-2 4.8%
0-3 1.8% 0-4 0.5% 0-5 0.1%
1-0 10.8% 1-1 13.2% 1-2 6.9%
1-3 2.5% 1-4 0.7% 1-5 0.2%
2-0 8.1% 2-1 8.9% 2-2 4.9%
2-3 1.8% 2-4 0.5% 2-5 0.1%
3-0 3.9% 3-1 4.3% 3-2 2.3%
3-3 0.9% 3-4 0.2% 3-5 0.1%
4-0 1.4% 4-1 1.5% 4-2 0.8%
4-3 0.3% 4-4 0.1% 4-5 0.0%
5-0 0.4% 5-1 0.4% 5-2 0.2%
5-3 0.1% 5-4 0.0% 5-5 0.0%
other 0.4%
likeliest_score
h 100.0% a 100.0% p 13.2%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 91.4% under_0.5 8.6% over_1.5 72.5%
under_1.5 27.5% over_2.5 46.3% under_2.5 53.7%
over_3.5 24.8% under_3.5 75.2% over_4.5 11.3%
under_4.5 88.8% over_5.5 4.4% under_5.5 95.6%
odd_even
odd 48.4% even 51.6%
team_home
over_0.5 76.0% under_0.5 24.0% over_1.5 41.7%
under_1.5 58.3% over_2.5 17.3% under_2.5 82.7%
team_away
over_0.5 66.8% under_0.5 33.3% over_1.5 30.1%
under_1.5 69.9% over_2.5 10.0% under_2.5 90.0%
most
home 43.8% draw 27.7% away 28.5%
handicap
home_-2.5 8.2% away_+2.5 91.8% home_-1.5 21.5%
away_+1.5 78.5% home_-0.5 43.8% away_+0.5 56.2%
home_+0.5 71.5% away_-0.5 28.5% home_+1.5 88.6%
away_-1.5 11.4% home_+2.5 96.6% away_-2.5 3.4%
total_exact
exact_0 8.6% exact_1 18.9% exact_2 26.1%
exact_3 21.5% exact_4 13.6% exact_5 6.9%
exact_6 2.9% exact_7plus 1.5%
First half range, not a point
1×2
home 32.4% draw 35.4% away 32.3%
total
over_0.5 79.8% under_0.5 20.3% over_1.5 47.4%
under_1.5 52.6% over_2.5 21.6% under_2.5 78.4%
btts
yes 30.3% no 69.8%
total_exact
exact_0 20.3% exact_1 32.3% exact_2 25.8%
exact_3 13.8% exact_4plus 7.8%
Second half range, not a point
1×2
home 45.9% draw 37.9% away 16.2%
total
over_0.5 73.1% under_0.5 26.9% over_1.5 37.8%
under_1.5 62.3% over_2.5 14.6% under_2.5 85.4%
btts
yes 20.0% no 80.0%
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
H/H 28.6% H/D 3.1% H/A 0.7%
D/H 16.2% D/D 13.4% D/A 5.7%
A/H 4.1% A/D 7.4% A/A 20.8%
Corners range, not a point
total
over_7.5 68.0% under_7.5 32.0% over_8.5 55.6%
under_8.5 44.4% over_9.5 43.2% under_9.5 56.8%
over_10.5 31.8% under_10.5 68.2% over_11.5 22.2%
under_11.5 77.8% over_12.5 14.8% under_12.5 85.2%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 68.1% under_3.5 31.9% over_4.5 51.6%
under_4.5 48.4% over_5.5 36.2% under_5.5 63.8%
team_away
over_3.5 59.8% under_3.5 40.2% over_4.5 42.4%
under_4.5 57.6% over_5.5 27.6% under_5.5 72.4%
most
home 50.4% draw 11.3% away 38.3%
handicap
home_-3.5 19.9% away_+3.5 80.1% home_-1.5 39.1%
away_+1.5 60.9% home_-0.5 50.4% away_+0.5 49.6%
home_+0.5 61.7% away_-0.5 38.3% home_+1.5 72.1%
away_-1.5 27.9% home_+3.5 87.6% away_-3.5 12.4%
Shots range, not a point
total
over_22.5 63.4% under_22.5 36.6% over_24.5 50.6%
under_24.5 49.4% over_26.5 38.2% under_26.5 61.8%
over_28.5 27.1% under_28.5 73.0%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_10.5 74.0% under_10.5 26.1% over_12.5 57.4%
under_12.5 42.6% over_14.5 40.6% under_14.5 59.4%
team_away
over_10.5 53.9% under_10.5 46.1% over_12.5 35.4%
under_12.5 64.6% over_14.5 20.7% under_14.5 79.3%
most
home 62.2% draw 6.0% away 31.8%
handicap
home_-4.5 36.6% away_+4.5 63.4% home_-2.5 49.4%
away_+2.5 50.6% home_-0.5 62.2% away_+0.5 37.8%
home_+0.5 68.2% away_-0.5 31.8% home_+2.5 78.8%
away_-2.5 21.2% home_+4.5 87.0% away_-4.5 13.0%
Shots on target range, not a point
total
over_6.5 73.7% under_6.5 26.3% over_7.5 61.2%
under_7.5 38.8% over_8.5 48.0% under_8.5 52.0%
over_9.5 35.6% under_9.5 64.4%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 69.9% under_3.5 30.1% over_4.5 52.4%
under_4.5 47.6% over_5.5 35.8% under_5.5 64.2%
team_away
over_3.5 50.1% under_3.5 49.9% over_4.5 31.5%
under_4.5 68.5% over_5.5 17.7% under_5.5 82.3%
most
home 58.1% draw 12.5% away 29.3%
handicap
home_-2.5 32.1% away_+2.5 67.9% home_-0.5 58.1%
away_+0.5 41.9% home_+0.5 70.7% away_-0.5 29.3%
home_+2.5 88.8% away_-2.5 11.2%
Cards calibrated
total
over_2.5 88.8% under_2.5 11.2% over_3.5 75.7%
under_3.5 24.3% over_4.5 58.8% under_4.5 41.2%
over_5.5 41.3% under_5.5 58.7%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_1.5 68.2% under_1.5 31.9% over_2.5 41.8%
under_2.5 58.2%
team_away
over_1.5 77.0% under_1.5 23.0% over_2.5 53.3%
under_2.5 46.7%
most
home 33.4% draw 17.7% away 48.9%
handicap
home_-1.5 18.9% away_+1.5 81.1% home_-0.5 33.4%
away_+0.5 66.6% home_+0.5 51.1% away_-0.5 48.9%
home_+1.5 68.5% away_-1.5 31.5%
Fouls calibrated
total
over_20.5 86.0% under_20.5 14.0% over_22.5 76.3%
under_22.5 23.7% over_24.5 64.3% under_24.5 35.7%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_9.5 78.4% under_9.5 21.6% over_11.5 60.5%
under_11.5 39.5% over_13.5 41.3% under_13.5 58.7%
team_away
over_9.5 85.6% under_9.5 14.4% over_11.5 71.0%
under_11.5 29.0% over_13.5 53.0% under_13.5 47.0%
most
home 38.6% draw 6.6% away 54.9%
handicap
home_-3.5 21.3% away_+3.5 78.7% home_-0.5 38.6%
away_+0.5 61.4% home_+2.5 58.5% away_-2.5 41.5%
Red card range, not a point
any
yes 17.7% no 82.3%
home
yes 4.9% no 95.1%
away
yes 13.5% no 86.5%
Method, limits & performance

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0106 (56038 matches).

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match