West Ham vs Queens Park Rangers prediction & probabilities (2026-10-09)

West Ham vs Queens Park Rangers: model prediction

Championship
West Ham

WWWWD

Fri, 9 Oct 20269/1020:00UK
Queens Park Rangers
Model’s top convictions

73%

Over 1.5 goals

70%

West Ham or draw

67%

Over 8.5 corners

Our priceNo bookmaker price published for this match yet.

Model pick

West Ham42.4%

Win probability · fair 2.36

Top signals

Over 1.5 goalsLikely73.1%Fair 1.37
West Ham or drawLikely70.0%Fair 1.43
Over 8.5 cornersLikely67.1%Fair 1.49

Model read

West Ham versus Queens Park Rangers on 9 October 2026 tilts towards West Ham in our numbers (42%), with plenty left over for the other outcomes. No strong lean on goals (47% Over 2.5). The interest, if any, lives elsewhere. As a promoted side, West Ham carry exactly the structural uncertainty our priors were built for. The engine passes on this one (no bookmaker price published for this match yet).

Value & higher-risk angles

Outcomes the model rates higher than the obvious price suggests, plus a few long-shot scorelines that are simply possible. These are the least likely calls on the page, so treat them as such. They are not tips, and we do not beat the sharp bookmakers.

High risk

Over 2.5 goals47.1%@ 2.12
Over 10.5 corners46.2%@ 2.16
Over 11.5 corners36.4%@ 2.75
Medium risk

Draw or Queens Park Rangers57.6%@ 1.74
Over 9.5 corners56.6%@ 1.77
Under 2.5 goals52.9%@ 1.89
Random finds

1-1 correct score13.2%@ 7.60
1-0 correct score10.3%@ 9.73
2-1 correct score8.8%@ 11.31

Model vs market

West Ham

42.4%

Draw

27.6%

Rangers

30.0%

Model

no bookmaker price published for this match yet

Goals

Over 1.5Strongest read · Likely73.1%Fair 1.37
Over 2.5Close call47.1%Fair 2.12
BTTS · YesClose call52.3%Fair 1.91

Corners

Over 8.5 cornersLikely67.1%Fair 1.49
Over 9.5 cornersClose call56.6%Fair 1.77
Over 10.5 cornersClose call46.2%Fair 2.16
Over 11.5 cornersUnlikely36.4%Fair 2.75
Most cornersWest Ham55.4%Queens Park Rangers34.2%

Shots

Over 22.5 shotsLikely65.3%Fair 1.53
Over 24.5 shotsClose call52.9%Fair 1.89
Over 26.5 shotsUnlikely40.6%Fair 2.46
Over 28.5 shotsLong shot29.4%Fair 3.40

Recent shot volume

West Ham15.0 taken13.0 faced

Shots taken and faced per game over each side’s last 6 matches, from real match data.

Totals line guide

0.5·1.573.1%2.547.1%3.5·4.5·
Recommended focusOver 1.573.1%

Discipline: Our price. No bookmaker price published for this match yet.

Form & head-to-head

West HamWWWWD

Season stats

Season 2026/27, real results only

West HamQueens Park Rangers
League position#2 of 27#25 of 27
Record W-D-L4-3-10-3-0
Current streakD1D3
Points per game1.88·
Record, home vs away3-0-10-2-0
PPG, home vs away2.25·
Goals scored per game2.75·
Goals conceded per game1.38·
Scored, home vs away3.50·
Conceded, home vs away1.00·
1st half goals per game1.12·
2nd half goals per game1.62·
Corners won per game6.6·
Cards per game2.3·
Fouls per game10.0·
Red cards this season1·
Shots per game15.8·
Shots faced per game12.9·
Shots on target per game5.9·
Over 2.5 rate

87.5%·

BTTS rate

75.0%·

Clean sheets

25.0%·

Rates this season:West HamQueens Park Rangers

League averages this season: 2.85 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 62% · BTTS in 67%. Full league tables & stats →

Model fair odds

Our calibrated probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote.

Match result

West Ham win2.36
Draw3.62
Queens Park Rangers win3.33
Both teams to score1.91

Goals

Over 0.5 goals1.09
Over 1.5 goals1.37
Over 2.5 goals2.12
Over 3.5 goals3.92
West Ham most2.36
Queens Park Rangers most3.33

Corners

Over 7.5 corners1.25
Over 8.5 corners1.43
Over 9.5 corners1.71
Over 10.5 corners2.13
West Ham most1.80
Queens Park Rangers most2.92

Cards

Over 2.5 cards1.41
Over 3.5 cards2.00
Over 4.5 cards3.26
Over 5.5 cards6.05
West Ham most2.87
Queens Park Rangers most2.30

Shots on target

Over 6.5 SoT1.40
Over 7.5 SoT1.69
Over 8.5 SoT2.15
Over 9.5 SoT2.88
West Ham most1.64
Queens Park Rangers most3.68

Shots

Over 22.5 shots1.53
Over 24.5 shots1.89
Over 26.5 shots2.46
Over 28.5 shots3.40
West Ham most1.54
Queens Park Rangers most3.40

Fouls

Over 20.5 fouls1.67
Over 22.5 fouls2.28
Over 24.5 fouls3.39
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots

Over 22.5 65.3% Over 24.5 53.0% Over 26.5 40.6% Over 28.5 29.4%
Most: West Ham 64.9% Most: Queens Park Rangers 29.4%
West Ham Over 13.2 52.5% Queens Park Rangers Over 13.2 27.2%

Shots on target

Over 6.5 71.5% Over 7.5 59.2% Over 8.5 46.5% Over 9.5 34.8%
Most: West Ham 61.0% Most: Queens Park Rangers 27.2%
West Ham Over 4.2 53.1% Queens Park Rangers Over 4.2 28.5%

Cards

Over 2.5 70.9% Over 3.5 49.9% Over 4.5 30.6%
Most: West Ham 34.9% Most: Queens Park Rangers 43.5%
West Ham Over 1.8 51.5% Queens Park Rangers Over 1.8 57.8%

Clean sheet & win to nil

Worked out from the scoreline grid above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the other side fails to score. It is the model’s own percentage, scored against the result afterwards, and it is not a tip.

West Ham clean sheet 31.6%
Queens Park Rangers clean sheet 24.4%
West Ham win to nil 23.2%
Queens Park Rangers win to nil 16.0%

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

The model’s own percentages, with no odds attached. The smaller markets are here so you can see everything we hold a number on, not because we claim an advantage in them. The colour says how close our percentages have landed to reality on matches the model had never seen.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 42.4% draw 27.6% away 30.0%
double_chance
1X 70.0% 12 72.4% X2 57.6%
dnb
home 58.5% away 41.5%
btts
yes 52.3% no 47.7%
clean_sheet
home 31.7% away 24.4%
win_to_nil
home 23.3% away 16.0%
winning_margin
home_by_1 21.9% home_by_2 12.8% home_by_3plus 7.7%
away_by_1 17.7% away_by_2 8.5% away_by_3plus 3.9%
correct_score
0-0 8.4% 0-1 8.3% 0-2 5.1%
0-3 2.0% 0-4 0.6% 0-5 0.1%
1-0 10.3% 1-1 13.2% 1-2 7.2%
1-3 2.8% 1-4 0.8% 1-5 0.2%
2-0 7.7% 2-1 8.8% 2-2 5.1%
2-3 2.0% 2-4 0.6% 2-5 0.1%
3-0 3.6% 3-1 4.2% 3-2 2.4%
3-3 0.9% 3-4 0.3% 3-5 0.1%
4-0 1.3% 4-1 1.5% 4-2 0.8%
4-3 0.3% 4-4 0.1% 4-5 0.0%
5-0 0.4% 5-1 0.4% 5-2 0.2%
5-3 0.1% 5-4 0.0% 5-5 0.0%
other 0.4%
likeliest_score
h 100.0% a 100.0% p 13.2%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 91.6% under_0.5 8.4% over_1.5 73.1%
under_1.5 26.9% over_2.5 47.2% under_2.5 52.8%
over_3.5 25.5% under_3.5 74.5% over_4.5 11.7%
under_4.5 88.3% over_5.5 4.6% under_5.5 95.4%
odd_even
odd 48.4% even 51.6%
team_home
over_0.5 75.6% under_0.5 24.4% over_1.5 41.2%
under_1.5 58.8% over_2.5 16.9% under_2.5 83.1%
team_away
over_0.5 68.3% under_0.5 31.7% over_1.5 31.9%
under_1.5 68.1% over_2.5 11.0% under_2.5 89.0%
most
home 42.4% draw 27.6% away 30.0%
handicap
home_-2.5 7.7% away_+2.5 92.3% home_-1.5 20.5%
away_+1.5 79.5% home_-0.5 42.4% away_+0.5 57.6%
home_+0.5 70.0% away_-0.5 30.0% home_+1.5 87.6%
away_-1.5 12.4% home_+2.5 96.1% away_-2.5 3.9%
total_exact
exact_0 8.4% exact_1 18.5% exact_2 26.0%
exact_3 21.6% exact_4 13.8% exact_5 7.1%
exact_6 3.0% exact_7plus 1.6%
First half range, not a point
1×2
home 42.5% draw 33.4% away 24.1%
total
over_0.5 81.6% under_0.5 18.4% over_1.5 50.5%
under_1.5 49.5% over_2.5 24.1% under_2.5 75.9%
btts
yes 31.5% no 68.6%
total_exact
exact_0 18.4% exact_1 31.1% exact_2 26.4%
exact_3 14.9% exact_4plus 9.2%
Second half range, not a point
1×2
home 57.1% draw 28.4% away 14.5%
total
over_0.5 84.6% under_0.5 15.4% over_1.5 55.7%
under_1.5 44.3% over_2.5 28.8% under_2.5 71.2%
btts
yes 30.2% no 69.8%
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
H/H 38.4% H/D 3.3% H/A 0.9%
D/H 19.1% D/D 9.5% D/A 4.9%
A/H 5.5% A/D 6.1% A/A 12.5%
Corners range, not a point
total
over_7.5 80.0% under_7.5 20.0% over_8.5 70.0%
under_8.5 30.0% over_9.5 58.6% under_9.5 41.4%
over_10.5 46.9% under_10.5 53.1% over_11.5 35.9%
under_11.5 64.1% over_12.5 26.2% under_12.5 73.8%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 78.8% under_3.5 21.2% over_4.5 64.8%
under_4.5 35.2% over_5.5 49.9% under_5.5 50.1%
team_away
over_3.5 65.9% under_3.5 34.1% over_4.5 49.1%
under_4.5 50.9% over_5.5 33.7% under_5.5 66.3%
most
home 55.6% draw 10.2% away 34.2%
handicap
home_-3.5 25.7% away_+3.5 74.3% home_-1.5 45.0%
away_+1.5 55.0% home_-0.5 55.6% away_+0.5 44.5%
home_+0.5 65.8% away_-0.5 34.2% home_+1.5 75.0%
away_-1.5 25.0% home_+3.5 88.6% away_-3.5 11.4%
Shots range, not a point
total
over_22.5 65.3% under_22.5 34.7% over_24.5 52.9%
under_24.5 47.1% over_26.5 40.6% under_26.5 59.4%
over_28.5 29.4% under_28.5 70.6%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_10.5 76.3% under_10.5 23.7% over_12.5 60.8%
under_12.5 39.2% over_14.5 44.4% under_14.5 55.6%
team_away
over_10.5 53.1% under_10.5 46.9% over_12.5 34.9%
under_12.5 65.1% over_14.5 20.6% under_14.5 79.4%
most
home 64.9% draw 5.7% away 29.4%
handicap
home_-4.5 40.0% away_+4.5 60.0% home_-2.5 52.6%
away_+2.5 47.4% home_-0.5 64.9% away_+0.5 35.1%
home_+0.5 70.6% away_-0.5 29.4% home_+2.5 80.5%
away_-2.5 19.5% home_+4.5 88.1% away_-4.5 11.9%
Shots on target range, not a point
total
over_6.5 71.5% under_6.5 28.5% over_7.5 59.2%
under_7.5 40.8% over_8.5 46.5% under_8.5 53.5%
over_9.5 34.8% under_9.5 65.2%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 69.7% under_3.5 30.3% over_4.5 53.1%
under_4.5 46.9% over_5.5 37.4% under_5.5 62.6%
team_away
over_3.5 46.0% under_3.5 54.1% over_4.5 28.5%
under_4.5 71.5% over_5.5 16.0% under_5.5 84.0%
most
home 61.0% draw 11.8% away 27.2%
handicap
home_-2.5 35.7% away_+2.5 64.4% home_-0.5 61.0%
away_+0.5 39.0% home_+0.5 72.8% away_-0.5 27.2%
home_+2.5 89.6% away_-2.5 10.4%
Cards calibrated
total
over_2.5 70.9% under_2.5 29.1% over_3.5 49.9%
under_3.5 50.1% over_4.5 30.6% under_4.5 69.4%
over_5.5 16.5% under_5.5 83.5%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_1.5 51.5% under_1.5 48.5% over_2.5 25.0%
under_2.5 75.0%
team_away
over_1.5 57.8% under_1.5 42.2% over_2.5 30.7%
under_2.5 69.3%
most
home 34.9% draw 21.6% away 43.5%
handicap
home_-1.5 17.6% away_+1.5 82.4% home_-0.5 34.9%
away_+0.5 65.1% home_+0.5 56.5% away_-0.5 43.5%
home_+1.5 75.9% away_-1.5 24.1%
Fouls calibrated
total
over_20.5 59.7% under_20.5 40.3% over_22.5 43.9%
under_22.5 56.1% over_24.5 29.5% under_24.5 70.5%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_9.5 57.6% under_9.5 42.4% over_11.5 35.1%
under_11.5 64.9% over_13.5 17.9% under_13.5 82.1%
team_away
over_9.5 70.0% under_9.5 30.0% over_11.5 48.4%
under_11.5 51.6% over_13.5 28.5% under_13.5 71.5%
most
home 36.7% draw 7.8% away 55.5%
handicap
home_-3.5 17.3% away_+3.5 82.7% home_-0.5 36.7%
away_+0.5 63.3% home_+2.5 60.4% away_-2.5 39.7%
Red card range, not a point
any
yes 9.7% no 90.3%
home
yes 7.1% no 92.9%
away
yes 2.7% no 97.3%

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0097 (55560 matches).

More: West Ham predictions · Queens Park Rangers predictions · Championship

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match

Markets

More on this match