Metz vs Rodez Correct Score
Result
Final score 4-1. The model gave that exact scoreline 0.7%.
Expert AI analysis
Our model lands on Most likely · 12.0% at 1-1, its strongest read on the Correct Score market. Recent output points the same way: Metz have averaged 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, Rodez 2.4 and 1.6 over their recent games. That fits a balanced goals environment: 52.6% for over 2.5 and 77.2% for at least two goals. Their last 4 meetings have averaged 4.3 goals a game. It is a calibrated model probability, graded out-of-sample, not a tip.
Correct Score
| Scoreline | Probability |
|---|---|
| 1-1 | 12.0% |
| 0-1 | 9.8% |
| 1-2 | 9.6% |
| 0-2 | 8.7% |
| 0-0 | 6.8% |
| 2-1 | 6.3% |
| 1-0 | 6.3% |
| 1-3 | 5.4% |
Score probability grid
| Metz \ Rodez | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7% | 10% | 9% | 5% | 2% | 1% |
| 1 | 6% | 12% | 10% | 5% | 2% | 1% |
| 2 | 4% | 6% | 5% | 3% | 1% | · |
| 3 | 1% | 2% | 2% | 1% | · | · |
| 4 | · | 1% | 1% | · | · | · |
| 5 | · | · | · | · | · | · |
Rows = Metz goals, columns = Rodez. The most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 12.0%. No exact score is ever truly likely; the value is in the full distribution the model assigns. The brightest cells are where the match is most likely to land.
Goals distribution
The model’s probability for the total number of goals, the shape behind every goals market. The 5+ bar groups every result with five or more goals.
0
1
2
3
4
5+
In-depth analysis
On the goals side, the model sees 52.6% for three or more goals and 77.2% for at least two, painting a balanced picture. Given Rodez favoured at 50.2%, a competitive game tends to open up.
We publish the model, not a sure thing. We grade every call after the match.
Model lenses
Different analytical lenses our model applies to the same calibrated data, not separate tipsters, and never a tip.
Form & head-to-head
Last 4 meetings: Metz 2 · 2 draws · Rodez 0 · 4.3 goals/game.
FAQ
What was the score in Metz vs Rodez?
Metz vs Rodez finished 4-1. The model's most likely scoreline was 1-1 at 12.0%; it gave the actual 4-1 a 0.7% chance.
How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.
Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.
Overall model accuracy
We don’t yet publish a graded Correct Score-specific track record, so this is our overall accuracy across every 1X2 call, graded out-of-sample, updated daily.
Predictions & track record updated 12 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →
More Ligue 2, Correct Score
Related
Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.

