Genk vs
Westerlo Correct Score
Result
Final score 3-2. The model gave that exact scoreline 3.2%.
Expert AI analysis
The model makes Most likely · 11.5% at 1-1, its strongest read on the Correct Score market. The goals picture is built on form: Genk have averaged 1.2 scored and 0.4 conceded, Westerlo 0.6 and 2.4 over their recent games. That fits an open goals environment: 55.3% for over 2.5 and 79.0% for at least two goals. Their last 5 meetings have averaged 2.4 goals a game. Calibrated against real results, we show the read, not a sure thing.
Correct Score
| Scoreline | Probability |
|---|---|
| 1-1 | 11.5% |
| 2-1 | 9.8% |
| 1-0 | 9.3% |
| 2-0 | 8.8% |
| 1-2 | 6.1% |
| 0-0 | 6.1% |
| 3-1 | 5.8% |
| 0-1 | 5.6% |
Score probability grid
| Genk \ Westerlo | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6% | 6% | 3% | 1% | · | · |
| 1 | 9% | 12% | 6% | 2% | 1% | · |
| 2 | 9% | 10% | 5% | 2% | 1% | · |
| 3 | 5% | 6% | 3% | 1% | · | · |
| 4 | 2% | 3% | 1% | 1% | · | · |
| 5 | 1% | 1% | 1% | · | · | · |
Rows = Genk goals, columns = Westerlo. The most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 11.5%. The grid is the model’s full scoreline distribution, not a single tip, but the shape of every plausible result. Read the heatmap as a map of likelihood, not a prediction of one score.
Goals distribution
The model’s probability for the total number of goals, the shape behind every goals market. The 5+ bar groups every result with five or more goals.
0
1
2
3
4
5+
In-depth analysis
For the goal environment, the model sees 55.3% for three or more goals and 79.0% for at least two, painting a balanced picture. Given Genk favoured at 52.4%, a close contest often produces chances at both ends.
These are calibrated model probabilities, not tips. The track record is public, misses included.
Model lenses
Different analytical lenses our model applies to the same calibrated data, not separate tipsters, and never a tip.
Form & head-to-head
Last 5 meetings: Genk 4 · 1 draws · Westerlo 0 · 2.4 goals/game.
FAQ
What was the score in Genk vs Westerlo?
Genk vs Westerlo finished 3-2. The model's most likely scoreline was 1-1 at 11.5%; it gave the actual 3-2 a 3.2% chance.
How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.
Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.
Overall model accuracy
We don’t yet publish a graded Correct Score-specific track record, so this is our overall accuracy across every 1X2 call, graded out-of-sample, updated daily.
Predictions & track record updated 12 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →
More Pro League, Correct Score
Related
Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.

