Heidenheim vs Dresden prediction & probabilities (2026-08-29)

Heidenheim vs Dresden: model prediction

2. Bundesliga
Heidenheim

LWWWL

Full time5-3Sat, 29 Aug 202612:00UK
Dresden

WLWLW

Model’s top convictions

78%

Over 1.5 goals

70%

Draw or Dresden

65%

Over 8.5 corners

Full time2 of 2 calls right

Heidenheim 5-3 Dresden
✕ Result✓ Over 2.5 goals✓ Both teams to score
2 of 3 published calls on this match were right.

Our most likely call was Dresden at 43.9%, and it was wrong. We called Over 2.5 at 54.1% and it landed (8 goals). We called Yes at 57.6% and it landed.

Judged against the prediction this page published before kickoff. Right or wrong, it stays on the record.

Prediction summary

Top 3 convictions

Model’s best bet
DresdenWin probability
43.9%
Top 3 convictions

Over 1.5 goals78.2%High probabilityPays @ 1.28
Draw or Dresden69.8%Strong chancePays @ 1.43
Over 8.5 corners65.3%Strong chancePays @ 1.53

Model read

Our engine prices Dresden at 44% for 29 August 2026. Favourites, yes; certainties, no. The numbers that frame it: • Notably, the model is warmer on Dresden than the market (35%). We flag disagreement rather than hide it. • Totals sit close to the fence: 54% for Over 2.5 with both teams to score at 58%. • Head to head, the last 5 meetings gave 2 wins for Heidenheim, 2 draws and 1 for Dresden, averaging 1.8 goals a game. • Heidenheim are newly promoted, a profile the model deliberately prices with caution. The run in: Heidenheim arrive W3 D1 L2, Dresden W3 D0 L3. Verdict: no bet. Outside trust zone (model prob 0.44, zone (0.45, 0.7)).

Value & higher-risk angles

High risk

Over 10.5 corners44.3%@ 2.26
Dresden win43.9%@ 2.28
Over 11.5 corners34.6%@ 2.89
Medium risk

Both teams to score57.6%@ 1.74
Heidenheim or draw56.1%@ 1.78
Over 9.5 corners54.7%@ 1.83
Random finds

1-1 correct score12.2%@ 8.19
1-2 correct score9.2%@ 10.93
0-1 correct score8.6%@ 11.66

Lower-probability calls our model rates above the obvious price; random finds are high-return scorelines that can happen. Higher risk, not a tip; we never beat the sharp market.

Model vs market

Heidenheim

30.2%-7.9%

Draw

25.9%-0.9%

Dresden

43.9%+8.8%

ModelMarket

outside trust zone (model prob 0.44, zone (0.45, 0.7))

Goals markets

★ StrongestOver 1.578.2%

High probability

Over 2.554.1%

Good chance

BTTS · Yes57.6%

Good chance

Corners markets

Over 8.565.3%

Strong chance

Over 9.554.7%

Good chance

Over 10.544.3%

Reasonable chance

Over 11.534.6%

Toss-up

Most cornersHeidenheim52.2%Dresden37.1%

Shots markets

Over 22.575.6%

Strong chance

Over 24.564.2%

Strong chance

Over 26.551.7%

Good chance

Over 28.539.4%

Toss-up

Totals line guide

0.5·1.578.2%2.554.1%3.5·4.5·
Our pre-match focusOver 1.578.2%

Before kick-off our call was Fairly priced. The match has been played, so this is a historical snapshot: the graded result is below.

Form & head-to-head

HeidenheimLWWWL
DresdenWLWLW

Last 5 meetings: Heidenheim 2 · 2 draws · Dresden 1 · 1.8 goals/game.

2022-02-18Dresden 1-1 Heidenheim
2021-09-12Heidenheim 2-1 Dresden
2020-02-02Heidenheim 0-0 Dresden
2019-08-18Dresden 2-1 Heidenheim
2019-02-02Heidenheim 1-0 Dresden

Season stats

Season 2026/27, real results only

HeidenheimDresden
League position#9 of 18#11 of 18
Record W-D-L1-0-11-0-1
Current streakL1W1
Record, home vs away1-0-00-0-1
Red cards this season00

Full league tables & stats →

Bookmaker odds

Real bookmaker price (Bet365) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.

BookmakerOur fair
Heidenheim win2.503.31
Draw3.503.86
Dresden win2.702.28
Over 2.5 goals1.531.85
Under 2.5 goals2.402.18

Model fair odds

Our calibrated probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote.

Match result

Heidenheim win3.31
Draw3.86
Dresden win2.28
Both teams to score1.74

Goals

Over 0.5 goals1.07
Over 1.5 goals1.28
Over 2.5 goals1.85
Over 3.5 goals3.15
Heidenheim most3.31
Dresden most2.28

Corners

Over 7.5 corners1.28
Over 8.5 corners1.47
Over 9.5 corners1.77
Over 10.5 corners2.24
Heidenheim most1.91
Dresden most2.69

Cards

Over 2.5 cards1.31
Over 3.5 cards1.75
Over 4.5 cards2.66
Over 5.5 cards4.57
Heidenheim most2.85
Dresden most2.25

Shots on target

Over 6.5 SoT1.29
Over 7.5 SoT1.51
Over 8.5 SoT1.85
Over 9.5 SoT2.38
Heidenheim most1.89
Dresden most2.87

Shots

Over 22.5 shots1.32
Over 24.5 shots1.56
Over 26.5 shots1.93
Over 28.5 shots2.54
Heidenheim most1.70
Dresden most2.84

Fouls

Over 20.5 fouls1.49
Over 22.5 fouls1.90
Over 24.5 fouls2.61
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots on target

Over 6.5 77.6% Over 7.5 66.4% Over 8.5 54.2% Over 9.5 42.0%
Most: Heidenheim 52.9% Most: Dresden 34.9%
Heidenheim Over 4.2 52.9% Dresden Over 4.2 39.9%

Cards

Over 2.5 76.5% Over 3.5 57.1% Over 4.5 37.6%
Most: Heidenheim 35.1% Most: Dresden 44.4%
Heidenheim Over 1.8 56.3% Dresden Over 1.8 62.9%

Clean sheet & win to nil

Heidenheim clean sheet 20.7%
Dresden clean sheet 27.9%
Heidenheim win to nil 14.3%
Dresden win to nil 21.5%

Derived from the model score matrix above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the opponent is on zero. Calibration-graded, not a tip.

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

Calibration-graded model %, no odds attached. Niche markets are transparency/coverage, not a claimed edge. Colour = measured out-of-sample calibration.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 30.3% draw 25.9% away 43.9%
double_chance
1X 56.2% 12 74.1% X2 69.8%
dnb
home 40.8% away 59.2%
btts
yes 57.6% no 42.4%
clean_sheet
home 20.7% away 28.1%
win_to_nil
home 14.3% away 21.7%
winning_margin
home_by_1 17.1% home_by_2 8.7% home_by_3plus 4.4%
away_by_1 21.3% away_by_2 13.4% away_by_3plus 9.1%
correct_score
0-0 6.4% 0-1 8.6% 0-2 7.2%
0-3 3.8% 0-4 1.5% 0-5 0.5%
1-0 6.8% 1-1 12.2% 1-2 9.2%
1-3 4.8% 1-4 1.9% 1-5 0.6%
2-0 4.7% 2-1 7.4% 2-2 5.8%
2-3 3.1% 2-4 1.2% 2-5 0.4%
3-0 2.0% 3-1 3.1% 3-2 2.5%
3-3 1.3% 3-4 0.5% 3-5 0.2%
4-0 0.6% 4-1 1.0% 4-2 0.8%
4-3 0.4% 4-4 0.2% 4-5 0.1%
5-0 0.2% 5-1 0.3% 5-2 0.2%
5-3 0.1% 5-4 0.0% 5-5 0.0%
other 0.8%
likeliest_score
h 100.0% a 100.0% p 12.2%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 93.6% under_0.5 6.4% over_1.5 78.2%
under_1.5 21.8% over_2.5 54.1% under_2.5 45.9%
over_3.5 31.8% under_3.5 68.2% over_4.5 15.9%
under_4.5 84.1% over_5.5 6.9% under_5.5 93.1%
odd_even
odd 48.7% even 51.3%
team_home
over_0.5 71.9% under_0.5 28.1% over_1.5 36.3%
under_1.5 63.7% over_2.5 13.6% under_2.5 86.4%
team_away
over_0.5 79.3% under_0.5 20.7% over_1.5 46.6%
under_1.5 53.4% over_2.5 21.0% under_2.5 79.0%
most
home 30.3% draw 25.9% away 43.9%
handicap
home_-2.5 4.4% away_+2.5 95.6% home_-1.5 13.1%
away_+1.5 86.9% home_-0.5 30.3% away_+0.5 69.8%
home_+0.5 56.1% away_-0.5 43.9% home_+1.5 77.5%
away_-1.5 22.5% home_+2.5 90.9% away_-2.5 9.1%
total_exact
exact_0 6.4% exact_1 15.4% exact_2 24.1%
exact_3 22.3% exact_4 15.9% exact_5 9.0%
exact_6 4.3% exact_7plus 2.6%
First half range, not a point
1×2
home 27.4% draw 29.5% away 43.1%
total
over_0.5 87.7% under_0.5 12.3% over_1.5 62.0%
under_1.5 38.0% over_2.5 35.0% under_2.5 65.0%
btts
yes 41.4% no 58.6%
total_exact
exact_0 12.3% exact_1 25.7% exact_2 27.0%
exact_3 18.9% exact_4plus 16.1%
Second half range, not a point
1×2
home 43.6% draw 34.4% away 22.0%
total
over_0.5 79.7% under_0.5 20.3% over_1.5 47.4%
under_1.5 52.6% over_2.5 21.6% under_2.5 78.4%
btts
yes 28.6% no 71.4%
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
H/H 23.0% H/D 3.3% H/A 1.1%
D/H 12.9% D/D 10.1% D/A 6.5%
A/H 4.8% A/D 8.2% A/A 30.2%
Corners range, not a point
total
over_7.5 78.4% under_7.5 21.6% over_8.5 68.0%
under_8.5 32.0% over_9.5 56.4% under_9.5 43.6%
over_10.5 44.7% under_10.5 55.3% over_11.5 33.8%
under_11.5 66.2% over_12.5 24.5% under_12.5 75.5%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 76.1% under_3.5 24.0% over_4.5 61.3%
under_4.5 38.7% over_5.5 46.1% under_5.5 53.9%
team_away
over_3.5 66.9% under_3.5 33.2% over_4.5 50.1%
under_4.5 49.9% over_5.5 34.7% under_5.5 65.3%
most
home 52.3% draw 10.5% away 37.2%
handicap
home_-3.5 22.8% away_+3.5 77.2% home_-1.5 41.6%
away_+1.5 58.4% home_-0.5 52.3% away_+0.5 47.7%
home_+0.5 62.8% away_-0.5 37.2% home_+1.5 72.5%
away_-1.5 27.5% home_+3.5 87.1% away_-3.5 12.9%
Shots range, not a point
total
over_22.5 75.6% under_22.5 24.4% over_24.5 64.2%
under_24.5 35.8% over_26.5 51.7% under_26.5 48.3%
over_28.5 39.4% under_28.5 60.6%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_10.5 79.7% under_10.5 20.3% over_12.5 64.5%
under_12.5 35.5% over_14.5 47.6% under_14.5 52.4%
team_away
over_10.5 66.3% under_10.5 33.7% over_12.5 47.9%
under_12.5 52.1% over_14.5 31.0% under_14.5 69.0%
most
home 58.7% draw 6.1% away 35.2%
handicap
home_-4.5 33.9% away_+4.5 66.1% home_-2.5 46.1%
away_+2.5 53.9% home_-0.5 58.7% away_+0.5 41.3%
home_+0.5 64.8% away_-0.5 35.2% home_+2.5 75.7%
away_-2.5 24.3% home_+4.5 84.5% away_-4.5 15.5%
Shots on target range, not a point
total
over_6.5 77.6% under_6.5 22.4% over_7.5 66.4%
under_7.5 33.6% over_8.5 54.2% under_8.5 45.8%
over_9.5 42.1% under_9.5 58.0%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 69.7% under_3.5 30.3% over_4.5 52.9%
under_4.5 47.1% over_5.5 36.9% under_5.5 63.1%
team_away
over_3.5 58.0% under_3.5 42.0% over_4.5 39.9%
under_4.5 60.1% over_5.5 25.0% under_5.5 75.1%
most
home 52.8% draw 12.3% away 34.9%
handicap
home_-2.5 29.0% away_+2.5 71.1% home_-0.5 52.8%
away_+0.5 47.2% home_+0.5 65.1% away_-0.5 34.9%
home_+2.5 84.5% away_-2.5 15.5%
Cards calibrated
total
over_2.5 76.5% under_2.5 23.5% over_3.5 57.1%
under_3.5 42.9% over_4.5 37.6% under_4.5 62.4%
over_5.5 21.9% under_5.5 78.1%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_1.5 56.3% under_1.5 43.7% over_2.5 29.3%
under_2.5 70.7%
team_away
over_1.5 62.9% under_1.5 37.1% over_2.5 36.0%
under_2.5 64.0%
most
home 35.1% draw 20.5% away 44.4%
handicap
home_-1.5 18.4% away_+1.5 81.6% home_-0.5 35.1%
away_+0.5 64.9% home_+0.5 55.6% away_-0.5 44.4%
home_+1.5 74.4% away_-1.5 25.6%
Fouls calibrated
total
over_20.5 67.2% under_20.5 32.8% over_22.5 52.7%
under_22.5 47.3% over_24.5 38.3% under_24.5 61.7%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_9.5 69.4% under_9.5 30.6% over_11.5 48.8%
under_11.5 51.2% over_13.5 29.7% under_13.5 70.3%
team_away
over_9.5 67.9% under_9.5 32.1% over_11.5 47.1%
under_11.5 52.9% over_13.5 28.2% under_13.5 71.8%
most
home 47.5% draw 7.4% away 45.1%
handicap
home_-3.5 26.7% away_+3.5 73.3% home_-0.5 47.5%
away_+0.5 52.5% home_+2.5 69.1% away_-2.5 31.0%
Red card range, not a point
any
yes 23.8% no 76.2%
home
yes 8.4% no 91.6%
away
yes 16.9% no 83.1%

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0095 (55261 matches).

More: Heidenheim predictions · Dresden predictions · 2. Bundesliga

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match

Markets

More on this match