Chesterfield vs Gillingham Double Chance
Part of a bigger picture: see the full match page, where this comes from.
Result
The highest-probability cover, Chesterfield or Draw (79.8%), landed.
model probability
Expert AI analysis
The model makes Home or Draw at 79.8%, its strongest read on the Double Chance market. On the result, Chesterfield are favoured at 54.3%, a competitive game that shapes how this market plays out. Their last 4 meetings have averaged 2.3 goals a game. These are the model’s own calibrated numbers, not betting advice.
Double Chance
Draw no bet
Draw no bet: the draw is taken out and the remaining probability is split between the two sides.
Winning margin
| Margin | Probability |
|---|---|
| Chesterfield by 1 | 24.3% |
| Chesterfield by 2 | 16.9% |
| Chesterfield by 3+ | 13.1% |
| Gillingham by 1 | 13.2% |
| Gillingham by 2 | 5.2% |
| Gillingham by 3+ | 1.8% |
| Draw | 25.5% |
Goal handicap
| Chesterfield line | Chesterfield | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| -2.5 | 13.1% | 86.9% |
| -1.5 | 30.0% | 70.0% |
| -0.5 | 54.3% | 45.7% |
| +0.5 | 79.8% | 20.2% |
Two of three outcomes covered, lower odds, higher strike rate. The highest-probability cover is Chesterfield or draw on the model numbers.
In-depth analysis
Reading the match, Chesterfield are favoured at 54.3%. Game state shapes this market, a side chasing the game tends to commit more.
Every figure is the model’s own calibrated read, not advice. Calibration is our edge, not beating the market.
Model lenses
Different analytical lenses our model applies to the same calibrated data, not separate tipsters, and never a tip.
Form & head-to-head
Last 4 meetings: Chesterfield 1 · 1 draws · Gillingham 2 · 2.3 goals/game.
FAQ
Which double chance landed in Chesterfield vs Gillingham?
Home or Draw was the highest-probability cover at 79.8%; it landed, final score 1-1.
How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.
Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.
Double Chance accuracy
How our Double Chance calls have actually performed, graded out-of-sample against real results.
In 39,986 matches we rated like this one (70–80%), Double Chance actually happened 73.4% of the time.
Predictions & track record updated 12 Sep 2026. See the full, dated track record →
Our last 10 Double Chance calls
The model’s most recent graded Double Chance predictions, out-of-sample. Green means the call hit, red means it missed. The number is the model confidence on each.
More League Two, Double Chance
Related
Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.

