Cheltenham vs Rotherham prediction & probabilities (2026-08-15)

Cheltenham vs Rotherham: model prediction

League Two
Cheltenham

WWLLL

Full time2-1Sat, 15 Aug 202615:00UK
Rotherham
Model’s top convictions

76%

Over 1.5 goals

71%

Cheltenham or draw

61%

Over 8.5 corners

Full time2 of 2 calls right

Cheltenham 2-1 Rotherham
✓ Result✓ Over 2.5 goals✓ Both teams to score
3 of 3 published calls on this match were right.

Our most likely call was Cheltenham at 45.1%, and it was correct. We called Over 2.5 at 51.6% and it landed (3 goals). We called Yes at 55.4% and it landed.

Judged against the prediction this page published before kickoff. Right or wrong, it stays on the record.

Prediction summary

Top 3 convictions

Model’s best bet
CheltenhamWin probability
45.1%
Top 3 convictions

Over 1.5 goals76.4%Strong chancePays @ 1.31
Cheltenham or draw71.4%Strong chancePays @ 1.40
Over 8.5 corners60.8%Strong chancePays @ 1.64

Model read

"Cheltenham or Rotherham? We publish probabilities, not certainties." The model leans Cheltenham at 45% when Cheltenham host Rotherham in the League Two on 15 August 2026. A lean, though, not a lock. Notably, the model is warmer on Cheltenham than the market (35%). We flag disagreement rather than hide it. No strong lean on goals (52% Over 2.5). The interest, if any, lives elsewhere. Rotherham are newly promoted, a profile the model deliberately prices with caution. The engine passes on this one (trust gate: NO_TRUST (segment historically unreliable)).

Value & higher-risk angles

High risk

Over 10.5 corners39.8%@ 2.51
Over 11.5 corners30.6%@ 3.27
Medium risk

Both teams to score55.4%@ 1.81
Draw or Rotherham54.9%@ 1.82
Over 2.5 goals51.6%@ 1.94
Random finds

1-1 correct score12.5%@ 8.01
1-0 correct score9.4%@ 10.62
2-1 correct score9.2%@ 10.85

Lower-probability calls our model rates above the obvious price; random finds are high-return scorelines that can happen. Higher risk, not a tip; we never beat the sharp market.

Model vs market

Cheltenham

45.1%+10.3%

Draw

26.3%-1.2%

Rotherham

28.6%-9.2%

ModelMarket

trust gate: NO_TRUST (segment historically unreliable)

Goals markets

★ StrongestOver 1.576.4%

Strong chance

Over 2.551.6%

Good chance

BTTS · Yes55.4%

Good chance

Corners markets

Over 8.560.8%

Strong chance

Over 9.550.1%

Good chance

Over 10.539.8%

Toss-up

Over 11.530.6%

Toss-up

Most cornersCheltenham51.1%Rotherham38.0%

Shots markets

Over 22.557.3%

Good chance

Over 24.544.5%

Reasonable chance

Over 26.532.7%

Toss-up

Over 28.522.6%

Low chance

Totals line guide

0.5·1.576.4%2.551.6%3.5·4.5·
Our pre-match focusOver 1.576.4%

Before kick-off our call was Fairly priced. The match has been played, so this is a historical snapshot: the graded result is below.

Form & head-to-head

CheltenhamWWLLL

Referee history

Cheltenham
A Byrne2 matches · team cards 1.0/g · match 5.5/g
A Chilowicz2 matches · team cards 1.5/g · match 2.5/g
B Speedie2 matches · team cards 3.5/g · match 5.5/g

Most-seen referees this season, real match data. We never claim who officiates this fixture.

Bookmaker odds

Real bookmaker price (Bet365) next to our model fair price. Bookmaker prices include the bookmaker margin, so our margin-free fair price usually looks longer. We do not claim to beat the closing market.

BookmakerOur fair
Cheltenham win2.652.22
Draw3.303.80
Rotherham win2.453.50
Over 2.5 goals1.981.94
Under 2.5 goals1.882.07

Model fair odds

Our calibrated probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote.

Match result

Cheltenham win2.22
Draw3.80
Rotherham win3.50
Both teams to score1.81

Goals

Over 0.5 goals1.08
Over 1.5 goals1.31
Over 2.5 goals1.94
Over 3.5 goals3.39
Cheltenham most2.22
Rotherham most3.50

Corners

Over 7.5 corners1.35
Over 8.5 corners1.59
Over 9.5 corners1.95
Over 10.5 corners2.52
Cheltenham most1.95
Rotherham most2.62

Cards

Over 2.5 cards1.45
Over 3.5 cards2.10
Over 4.5 cards3.49
Over 5.5 cards6.63
Cheltenham most3.34
Rotherham most2.06

Shots on target

Over 6.5 SoT1.51
Over 7.5 SoT1.86
Over 8.5 SoT2.41
Over 9.5 SoT3.29
Cheltenham most2.60
Rotherham most2.05

Shots

Over 22.5 shots1.74
Over 24.5 shots2.25
Over 26.5 shots3.06
Over 28.5 shots4.43
Cheltenham most1.93
Rotherham most2.40

Fouls

Over 20.5 fouls1.54
Over 22.5 fouls2.02
Over 24.5 fouls2.89
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets

Shots on target

Over 6.5 66.4% Over 7.5 53.8% Over 8.5 41.4% Over 9.5 30.4%
Most: Cheltenham 38.5% Most: Rotherham 48.7%
Cheltenham Over 4.2 33.9% Rotherham Over 4.2 41.1%

Cards

Over 2.5 69.1% Over 3.5 47.7% Over 4.5 28.7%
Most: Cheltenham 29.9% Most: Rotherham 48.6%
Cheltenham Over 1.8 45.9% Rotherham Over 1.8 59.8%

Clean sheet & win to nil

Cheltenham clean sheet 30.3%
Rotherham clean sheet 21.2%
Cheltenham win to nil 23.2%
Rotherham win to nil 14.1%

Derived from the model score matrix above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the opponent is on zero. Calibration-graded, not a tip.

Full market spectrum · model probabilities

Calibration-graded model %, no odds attached. Niche markets are transparency/coverage, not a claimed edge. Colour = measured out-of-sample calibration.

Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
home 45.1% draw 26.3% away 28.6%
double_chance
1X 71.4% 12 73.7% X2 54.9%
dnb
home 61.2% away 38.8%
btts
yes 55.4% no 44.6%
clean_sheet
home 30.5% away 21.2%
win_to_nil
home 23.4% away 14.1%
winning_margin
home_by_1 22.0% home_by_2 13.8% home_by_3plus 9.4%
away_by_1 16.7% away_by_2 8.1% away_by_3plus 3.8%
correct_score
0-0 7.1% 0-1 7.1% 0-2 4.6%
0-3 1.8% 0-4 0.5% 0-5 0.1%
1-0 9.4% 1-1 12.5% 1-2 7.1%
1-3 2.8% 1-4 0.8% 1-5 0.2%
2-0 7.8% 2-1 9.2% 2-2 5.5%
2-3 2.2% 2-4 0.7% 2-5 0.2%
3-0 4.0% 3-1 4.8% 3-2 2.8%
3-3 1.1% 3-4 0.3% 3-5 0.1%
4-0 1.6% 4-1 1.9% 4-2 1.1%
4-3 0.4% 4-4 0.1% 4-5 0.0%
5-0 0.5% 5-1 0.6% 5-2 0.3%
5-3 0.1% 5-4 0.0% 5-5 0.0%
other 0.7%
likeliest_score
h 100.0% a 100.0% p 12.5%
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
over_0.5 92.9% under_0.5 7.1% over_1.5 76.4%
under_1.5 23.6% over_2.5 51.6% under_2.5 48.4%
over_3.5 29.5% under_3.5 70.5% over_4.5 14.4%
under_4.5 85.6% over_5.5 6.0% under_5.5 94.0%
odd_even
odd 48.6% even 51.4%
team_home
over_0.5 78.8% under_0.5 21.2% over_1.5 45.9%
under_1.5 54.1% over_2.5 20.5% under_2.5 79.6%
team_away
over_0.5 69.6% under_0.5 30.5% over_1.5 33.4%
under_1.5 66.6% over_2.5 11.8% under_2.5 88.2%
most
home 45.1% draw 26.3% away 28.6%
handicap
home_-2.5 9.4% away_+2.5 90.6% home_-1.5 23.1%
away_+1.5 76.9% home_-0.5 45.1% away_+0.5 54.9%
home_+0.5 71.4% away_-0.5 28.6% home_+1.5 88.1%
away_-1.5 11.9% home_+2.5 96.2% away_-2.5 3.8%
total_exact
exact_0 7.1% exact_1 16.5% exact_2 24.8%
exact_3 22.1% exact_4 15.2% exact_5 8.3%
exact_6 3.8% exact_7plus 2.2%
First half range, not a point
1×2
home 19.3% draw 42.7% away 38.1%
total
over_0.5 67.7% under_0.5 32.3% over_1.5 31.2%
under_1.5 68.8% over_2.5 10.6% under_2.5 89.4%
btts
yes 17.4% no 82.6%
total_exact
exact_0 32.3% exact_1 36.5% exact_2 20.6%
exact_3 7.8% exact_4plus 2.8%
Second half range, not a point
1×2
home 36.6% draw 33.6% away 29.8%
total
over_0.5 82.3% under_0.5 17.8% over_1.5 51.6%
under_1.5 48.4% over_2.5 25.0% under_2.5 75.0%
btts
yes 33.3% no 66.7%
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
H/H 14.3% H/D 3.4% H/A 1.6%
D/H 15.6% D/D 14.3% D/A 12.7%
A/H 3.9% A/D 7.1% A/A 27.1%
Corners range, not a point
total
over_7.5 74.0% under_7.5 26.0% over_8.5 62.9%
under_8.5 37.1% over_9.5 51.2% under_9.5 48.8%
over_10.5 39.8% under_10.5 60.2% over_11.5 29.5%
under_11.5 70.5% over_12.5 21.0% under_12.5 79.0%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 72.4% under_3.5 27.6% over_4.5 57.0%
under_4.5 43.0% over_5.5 41.9% under_5.5 58.1%
team_away
over_3.5 64.0% under_3.5 36.0% over_4.5 47.3%
under_4.5 52.7% over_5.5 32.3% under_5.5 67.7%
most
home 51.2% draw 10.7% away 38.1%
handicap
home_-3.5 21.8% away_+3.5 78.2% home_-1.5 40.4%
away_+1.5 59.6% home_-0.5 51.2% away_+0.5 48.8%
home_+0.5 61.9% away_-0.5 38.1% home_+1.5 71.8%
away_-1.5 28.2% home_+3.5 86.8% away_-3.5 13.2%
Shots range, not a point
total
over_22.5 57.3% under_22.5 42.7% over_24.5 44.5%
under_24.5 55.5% over_26.5 32.7% under_26.5 67.4%
over_28.5 22.6% under_28.5 77.4%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_10.5 63.8% under_10.5 36.2% over_12.5 46.0%
under_12.5 54.0% over_14.5 30.0% under_14.5 70.0%
team_away
over_10.5 56.9% under_10.5 43.2% over_12.5 38.7%
under_12.5 61.3% over_14.5 23.7% under_14.5 76.3%
most
home 51.9% draw 6.5% away 41.6%
handicap
home_-4.5 27.3% away_+4.5 72.7% home_-2.5 39.0%
away_+2.5 61.0% home_-0.5 51.9% away_+0.5 48.1%
home_+0.5 58.4% away_-0.5 41.6% home_+2.5 70.5%
away_-2.5 29.5% home_+4.5 80.6% away_-4.5 19.4%
Shots on target range, not a point
total
over_6.5 66.4% under_6.5 33.6% over_7.5 53.8%
under_7.5 46.2% over_8.5 41.4% under_8.5 58.6%
over_9.5 30.4% under_9.5 69.6%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_3.5 51.1% under_3.5 48.9% over_4.5 33.9%
under_4.5 66.1% over_5.5 20.6% under_5.5 79.4%
team_away
over_3.5 58.3% under_3.5 41.7% over_4.5 41.1%
under_4.5 58.9% over_5.5 26.7% under_5.5 73.3%
most
home 38.5% draw 12.9% away 48.7%
handicap
home_-2.5 17.4% away_+2.5 82.6% home_-0.5 38.5%
away_+0.5 61.5% home_+0.5 51.3% away_-0.5 48.7%
home_+2.5 75.1% away_-2.5 24.9%
Cards calibrated
total
over_2.5 69.1% under_2.5 30.9% over_3.5 47.7%
under_3.5 52.3% over_4.5 28.7% under_4.5 71.3%
over_5.5 15.1% under_5.5 84.9%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_1.5 45.9% under_1.5 54.1% over_2.5 20.4%
under_2.5 79.6%
team_away
over_1.5 59.8% under_1.5 40.2% over_2.5 32.7%
under_2.5 67.3%
most
home 29.9% draw 21.5% away 48.6%
handicap
home_-1.5 14.0% away_+1.5 86.0% home_-0.5 29.9%
away_+0.5 70.1% home_+0.5 51.4% away_-0.5 48.6%
home_+1.5 72.1% away_-1.5 28.0%
Fouls calibrated
total
over_20.5 65.0% under_20.5 35.0% over_22.5 49.6%
under_22.5 50.4% over_24.5 34.6% under_24.5 65.4%
odd_even
odd 50.0% even 50.0%
team_home
over_9.5 59.5% under_9.5 40.5% over_11.5 37.0%
under_11.5 63.0% over_13.5 19.2% under_13.5 80.8%
team_away
over_9.5 74.8% under_9.5 25.3% over_11.5 54.3%
under_11.5 45.7% over_13.5 33.8% under_13.5 66.2%
most
home 34.2% draw 7.5% away 58.3%
handicap
home_-3.5 15.9% away_+3.5 84.1% home_-0.5 34.2%
away_+0.5 65.8% home_+2.5 57.4% away_-2.5 42.6%
Red card range, not a point
any
yes 10.6% no 89.4%
home
yes 5.9% no 94.1%
away
yes 5.0% no 95.0%

How this works (honestly)

We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.

What we use

Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.

Our method

Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.

What we don’t do

We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.

Performance snapshot

Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0095 (55261 matches).

More: Cheltenham predictions · Rotherham predictions · League Two

Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.

Explore this match

Markets

More on this match