Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham: model prediction
Over 1.5 goals
Nottingham Forest or draw
Over 8.5 corners
Full time4 of 11 calls right
Our most likely call was Nottingham Forest at 48.2%, and it was wrong. We called Over 2.5 at 50.9% and it missed (0 goals). We called Over 1.5 at 75.9% and it missed (0 goals). We called Under 3.5 at 71.1% and it landed (0 goals). We called Yes at 54.0% and it missed. We called Yes at 72.4% and it missed. We called Yes at 78.1% and it missed. We called Over 9.5 at 50.4% and it landed (12 corners). We called Over 3.5 at 57.6% and it landed (4 yellow cards). We called Over 24.5 at 51.1% and it missed (23 shots). We called Over 7.5 at 56.3% and it missed (2 shots on target). We called No at 94.6% and it landed.
| Match data | Nottingham Forest | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| Goals, 1st half | 0 | 0 |
| Goals, 2nd half | 0 | 0 |
| Shots | 12 | 11 |
| Shots, 1st half | 7 | 4 |
| Shots, 2nd half | 5 | 8 |
| Shots on target | 2 | 0 |
| Corners | 2 | 10 |
| Yellow cards | 2 | 2 |
| Red cards | 0 | 0 |
| Fouls | 22 | 14 |
| Expected goals (xG) | 0.83 | 1.48 |
Final match data. Half-by-half shots come from Understat shot data, with the half-time split verified against the half-time score, so they can differ slightly from the match shot total.
Judged against the prediction this page published before kickoff. Right or wrong, it stays on the record.
Prediction summary
Top 3 convictions
Model read
▾
The model leans Nottingham Forest at 48% when Nottingham Forest host Tottenham in the Premier League on 5 September 2026. A lean, though, not a lock. Three angles decide this preview: 1) Totals sit close to the fence: 51% for Over 2.5 with both teams to score at 54%. 2) The run in: Nottingham Forest arrive W1 D3 L2, Tottenham W2 D1 L3. 3) The recent series reads 4 wins for Nottingham Forest, 0 draws and 1 for Tottenham over 5 games, 2.8 goals on average. On the availability front, Nottingham Forest have Morato ruled out, Savona ruled out, Abbott ruled out, Bindon ruled out. Arnaud Kalimuendo Muinga drives the home shot volume, 1.2 on target per 90. Verdict: no bet. No bookmaker price published for this match yet.
Value & higher-risk angles
Lower-probability calls our model rates above the obvious price; random finds are high-return scorelines that can happen. Higher risk, not a tip; we never beat the sharp market.
Model vs market
48.2%
25.9%
25.9%
no bookmaker price published for this match yet
Goals markets
Strong chance
Good chance
Good chance
Corners markets
Good chance
Reasonable chance
Toss-up
Toss-up
Shots markets
Strong chance
Good chance
Toss-up
Low chance
Totals line guide
Before kick-off this match stood as Our price. The match has been played, so this is a historical snapshot: the graded result is below.
Form & head-to-head
Last 5 meetings: Nottingham Forest 4 · 0 draws · Tottenham 1 · 2.8 goals/game.
Season stats
Season 2026/27, real results only
League averages this season: 3.10 goals per match · Over 2.5 in 55% · BTTS in 50%. Full league tables & stats →
Players to watch
Top 3 per side by recent form, this season’s squad only, a watch list, not a confirmed lineup
@ 3.15
@ 1.72
@ 1.88
@ 2.79
@ 1.48
@ 1.28
@ 5.88
@ 2.16
@ 2.11
@ 27.03
@ 2.40
@ 2.37
@ 2.90
@ 1.88
@ 2.03
@ 4.20
@ 1.89
@ 1.84
Model fair odds
Our calibrated probability as a decimal price (1 divided by probability). A fair model price, not a bookmaker quote.
Match result
Goals
Corners
Cards
Shots on target
Shots
Fouls
Team news
Most likely availability, voted across independent sources. A model input, not a confirmed lineup.
- MoratoNottingham ForestOut0% to play
- SavonaNottingham ForestOut0% to play
- AbbottNottingham ForestOut0% to play
- BindonNottingham ForestOut0% to play
- HutchinsonNottingham ForestOut0% to play
- BakwaNottingham ForestOut0% to play
- John Victor, Nicolo Savona, Chris Wood, Jair Cunha, Willy BolyNottingham ForestOut
- VicarioTottenhamOut0% to play
- RomeroTottenhamOut0% to play
- SpenceTottenhamOut0% to play
- PhillipsTottenhamOut0% to play
- SouzaTottenhamOut0% to play
- XaviTottenhamOut0% to play
- MaddisonTottenhamDoubtful75% to play
All model outcomes · full market spectrum & player markets
Shots on target
| Over 6.5 | 68.5% | Over 7.5 | 56.3% | Over 8.5 | 44.1% | Over 9.5 | 33.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most: Nottingham Forest | 48.4% | Most: Tottenham | 39.1% | ||||
| Nottingham Forest Over 4.2 | 42.7% | Tottenham Over 4.2 | 36.1% |
Cards
| Over 2.5 | 76.9% | Over 3.5 | 57.6% | Over 4.5 | 38.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most: Nottingham Forest | 27.3% | Most: Tottenham | 53.1% | ||
| Nottingham Forest Over 1.8 | 50.2% | Tottenham Over 1.8 | 68.4% |
Nottingham Forest: players to watch (recent-form projection)
O/U = Poisson on per-90 rates scaled to the player’s expected minutes · this season’s squad, a recent-form projection, not a confirmed lineup.
| Player | Shots/90 | SoT/90 | Goals/90 | 1+ SoT | 2+ shots | To score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Kalimuendo Muinga | 2.38 | 1.16 | 0.51 | 58.0% | 53.1% | 31.7% |
| Liam Delap | 2.56 | 1 | 0.3 | 46.3% | 47.3% | 17.0% |
| Chris Wood | 2 | 0.92 | 0.51 | 53.3% | 49.3% | 34.5% |
| Igor Jesus | 2.64 | 0.8 | 0.21 | 43.7% | 56.6% | 14.0% |
| Morgan Gibbs-White | 2.13 | 0.75 | 0.33 | 50.6% | 59.5% | 26.7% |
Tottenham: players to watch (recent-form projection)
O/U = Poisson on per-90 rates scaled to the player’s expected minutes · this season’s squad, a recent-form projection, not a confirmed lineup.
| Player | Shots/90 | SoT/90 | Goals/90 | 1+ SoT | 2+ shots | To score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omar Marmoush | 4.15 | 1.62 | 0.64 | 67.6% | 78.3% | 35.9% |
| Sávio | 2.67 | 1 | 0.07 | 41.7% | 42.2% | 3.7% |
| Dominic Solanke | 2.28 | 0.94 | 0.34 | 52.8% | 54.3% | 23.8% |
| James Maddison | 1.91 | 0.76 | 0.49 | 27.8% | 19.8% | 19.0% |
| Mathys Tel | 2.44 | 0.71 | 0.2 | 32.2% | 38.6% | 10.4% |
Clean sheet & win to nil
| Nottingham Forest clean sheet | 32.7% |
|---|---|
| Tottenham clean sheet | 20.3% |
| Nottingham Forest win to nil | 25.5% |
| Tottenham win to nil | 13.1% |
Derived from the model score matrix above: a clean sheet is every scoreline where the opponent is on zero. Calibration-graded, not a tip.
Full market spectrum · model probabilities
Calibration-graded model %, no odds attached. Niche markets are transparency/coverage, not a claimed edge. Colour = measured out-of-sample calibration.
Match result & goals calibrated
1×2
| home | 48.1% | draw | 26.0% | away | 26.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
double_chance
| 1X | 74.1% | 12 | 74.0% | X2 | 51.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dnb
| home | 64.9% | away | 35.1% |
|---|
btts
| yes | 54.0% | no | 46.0% |
|---|
clean_sheet
| home | 32.9% | away | 20.3% |
|---|
win_to_nil
| home | 25.7% | away | 13.1% |
|---|
winning_margin
| home_by_1 | 22.6% | home_by_2 | 14.8% | home_by_3plus | 10.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_by_1 | 15.6% | away_by_2 | 7.2% | away_by_3plus | 3.1% |
correct_score
| 0-0 | 7.3% | 0-1 | 6.8% | 0-2 | 4.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-3 | 1.5% | 0-4 | 0.4% | 0-5 | 0.1% |
| 1-0 | 10.0% | 1-1 | 12.4% | 1-2 | 6.6% |
| 1-3 | 2.4% | 1-4 | 0.7% | 1-5 | 0.2% |
| 2-0 | 8.5% | 2-1 | 9.4% | 2-2 | 5.2% |
| 2-3 | 1.9% | 2-4 | 0.5% | 2-5 | 0.1% |
| 3-0 | 4.6% | 3-1 | 5.0% | 3-2 | 2.8% |
| 3-3 | 1.0% | 3-4 | 0.3% | 3-5 | 0.1% |
| 4-0 | 1.8% | 4-1 | 2.0% | 4-2 | 1.1% |
| 4-3 | 0.4% | 4-4 | 0.1% | 4-5 | 0.0% |
| 5-0 | 0.6% | 5-1 | 0.7% | 5-2 | 0.4% |
| 5-3 | 0.1% | 5-4 | 0.0% | 5-5 | 0.0% |
| other | 0.7% |
likeliest_score
| h | 100.0% | a | 100.0% | p | 12.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goals: totals / handicap / exact calibrated
total
| over_0.5 | 92.7% | under_0.5 | 7.3% | over_1.5 | 75.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 24.1% | over_2.5 | 50.9% | under_2.5 | 49.1% |
| over_3.5 | 28.9% | under_3.5 | 71.1% | over_4.5 | 13.9% |
| under_4.5 | 86.1% | over_5.5 | 5.8% | under_5.5 | 94.2% |
odd_even
| odd | 48.6% | even | 51.4% |
|---|
team_home
| over_0.5 | 79.7% | under_0.5 | 20.3% | over_1.5 | 47.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 52.6% | over_2.5 | 21.7% | under_2.5 | 78.3% |
team_away
| over_0.5 | 67.1% | under_0.5 | 32.9% | over_1.5 | 30.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 69.5% | over_2.5 | 10.2% | under_2.5 | 89.8% |
most
| home | 48.1% | draw | 26.0% | away | 26.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-2.5 | 10.7% | away_+2.5 | 89.3% | home_-1.5 | 25.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+1.5 | 74.6% | home_-0.5 | 48.1% | away_+0.5 | 51.9% |
| home_+0.5 | 74.0% | away_-0.5 | 26.0% | home_+1.5 | 89.7% |
| away_-1.5 | 10.3% | home_+2.5 | 96.9% | away_-2.5 | 3.1% |
total_exact
| exact_0 | 7.3% | exact_1 | 16.9% | exact_2 | 25.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exact_3 | 22.0% | exact_4 | 15.0% | exact_5 | 8.1% |
| exact_6 | 3.7% | exact_7plus | 2.1% |
First half range, not a point
1×2
| home | 45.5% | draw | 38.4% | away | 16.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
total
| over_0.5 | 72.4% | under_0.5 | 27.6% | over_1.5 | 36.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 63.1% | over_2.5 | 14.0% | under_2.5 | 86.0% |
btts
| yes | 19.5% | no | 80.5% |
|---|
total_exact
| exact_0 | 27.6% | exact_1 | 35.5% | exact_2 | 22.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exact_3 | 9.8% | exact_4plus | 4.2% |
Second half range, not a point
1×2
| home | 38.8% | draw | 36.0% | away | 25.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
total
| over_0.5 | 78.1% | under_0.5 | 21.9% | over_1.5 | 44.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_1.5 | 55.1% | over_2.5 | 19.6% | under_2.5 | 80.4% |
btts
| yes | 27.7% | no | 72.3% |
|---|
Half-time / full-time range, not a point
| H/H | 37.4% | H/D | 6.0% | H/A | 2.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D/H | 14.9% | D/D | 13.8% | D/A | 9.6% |
| A/H | 1.9% | A/D | 3.6% | A/A | 10.6% |
Corners range, not a point
total
| over_7.5 | 73.5% | under_7.5 | 26.5% | over_8.5 | 62.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_8.5 | 37.8% | over_9.5 | 50.4% | under_9.5 | 49.6% |
| over_10.5 | 38.9% | under_10.5 | 61.1% | over_11.5 | 28.7% |
| under_11.5 | 71.3% | over_12.5 | 20.3% | under_12.5 | 79.7% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_3.5 | 71.8% | under_3.5 | 28.2% | over_4.5 | 56.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 43.2% | over_5.5 | 42.1% | under_5.5 | 57.9% |
team_away
| over_3.5 | 62.1% | under_3.5 | 37.9% | over_4.5 | 45.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 54.3% | over_5.5 | 31.2% | under_5.5 | 68.8% |
most
| home | 52.2% | draw | 10.2% | away | 37.6% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-3.5 | 23.5% | away_+3.5 | 76.5% | home_-1.5 | 41.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+1.5 | 58.2% | home_-0.5 | 52.2% | away_+0.5 | 47.9% |
| home_+0.5 | 62.4% | away_-0.5 | 37.6% | home_+1.5 | 71.8% |
| away_-1.5 | 28.2% | home_+3.5 | 86.3% | away_-3.5 | 13.7% |
Shots range, not a point
total
| over_22.5 | 62.7% | under_22.5 | 37.3% | over_24.5 | 51.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_24.5 | 48.9% | over_26.5 | 39.7% | under_26.5 | 60.3% |
| over_28.5 | 29.4% | under_28.5 | 70.6% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_10.5 | 71.8% | under_10.5 | 28.2% | over_12.5 | 56.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_12.5 | 43.3% | over_14.5 | 41.6% | under_14.5 | 58.4% |
team_away
| over_10.5 | 53.5% | under_10.5 | 46.5% | over_12.5 | 36.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_12.5 | 63.2% | over_14.5 | 23.2% | under_14.5 | 76.8% |
most
| home | 61.0% | draw | 5.6% | away | 33.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-4.5 | 37.7% | away_+4.5 | 62.3% | home_-2.5 | 49.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+2.5 | 50.7% | home_-0.5 | 61.0% | away_+0.5 | 39.0% |
| home_+0.5 | 66.5% | away_-0.5 | 33.5% | home_+2.5 | 76.5% |
| away_-2.5 | 23.5% | home_+4.5 | 84.6% | away_-4.5 | 15.4% |
Shots on target range, not a point
total
| over_6.5 | 68.5% | under_6.5 | 31.5% | over_7.5 | 56.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_7.5 | 43.7% | over_8.5 | 44.1% | under_8.5 | 55.9% |
| over_9.5 | 33.0% | under_9.5 | 67.0% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_3.5 | 59.6% | under_3.5 | 40.4% | over_4.5 | 42.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 57.3% | over_5.5 | 28.3% | under_5.5 | 71.7% |
team_away
| over_3.5 | 53.2% | under_3.5 | 46.8% | over_4.5 | 36.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_4.5 | 63.9% | over_5.5 | 22.5% | under_5.5 | 77.5% |
most
| home | 48.4% | draw | 12.6% | away | 39.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-2.5 | 25.2% | away_+2.5 | 74.8% | home_-0.5 | 48.4% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+0.5 | 51.7% | home_+0.5 | 60.9% | away_-0.5 | 39.1% |
| home_+2.5 | 81.8% | away_-2.5 | 18.2% |
Cards calibrated
total
| over_2.5 | 76.9% | under_2.5 | 23.1% | over_3.5 | 57.6% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_3.5 | 42.4% | over_4.5 | 38.1% | under_4.5 | 61.9% |
| over_5.5 | 22.3% | under_5.5 | 77.7% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_1.5 | 50.1% | under_1.5 | 49.9% | over_2.5 | 23.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_2.5 | 76.2% |
team_away
| over_1.5 | 68.4% | under_1.5 | 31.6% | over_2.5 | 42.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_2.5 | 57.9% |
most
| home | 27.3% | draw | 19.6% | away | 53.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-1.5 | 13.1% | away_+1.5 | 86.9% | home_-0.5 | 27.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+0.5 | 72.7% | home_+0.5 | 46.9% | away_-0.5 | 53.1% |
| home_+1.5 | 66.9% | away_-1.5 | 33.1% |
Fouls calibrated
total
| over_20.5 | 67.8% | under_20.5 | 32.2% | over_22.5 | 52.2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_22.5 | 47.8% | over_24.5 | 36.7% | under_24.5 | 63.3% |
odd_even
| odd | 50.0% | even | 50.0% |
|---|
team_home
| over_9.5 | 62.9% | under_9.5 | 37.1% | over_11.5 | 39.9% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_11.5 | 60.1% | over_13.5 | 21.0% | under_13.5 | 79.0% |
team_away
| over_9.5 | 75.9% | under_9.5 | 24.1% | over_11.5 | 55.1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| under_11.5 | 44.9% | over_13.5 | 34.0% | under_13.5 | 66.0% |
most
| home | 35.5% | draw | 7.7% | away | 56.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
handicap
| home_-3.5 | 16.5% | away_+3.5 | 83.5% | home_-0.5 | 35.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| away_+0.5 | 64.5% | home_+2.5 | 59.2% | away_-2.5 | 40.8% |
Red card range, not a point
any
| yes | 5.4% | no | 94.6% |
|---|
home
| yes | 1.6% | no | 98.4% |
|---|
away
| yes | 3.9% | no | 96.1% |
|---|
How this works (honestly)
We are transparent about our method, our limits and how we measure performance.
Results, odds & closing prices, xG, shots, lineups, referee and schedule load.
Dixon-Coles + an xG strength model + champion/challenger selection + probability calibration + a trust gate.
We do not beat the sharp market. The value is honest probabilities, No-bet calls and CLV.
Top-pick hit rate 47.7% (reliability, not edge). Calibration error 0.0095 (55261 matches).
More: Nottingham Forest predictions · Tottenham predictions · Premier League
Not financial advice. No model beats the sharp closing market on public data. The value here is honest probabilities, No-bet calls, and CLV history.
Explore this match
Markets

